Provide An Original And Substantive Response To The Question

Provide An Original And Substantive Response To The Questions Posed In

Provide an original and substantive response to the questions posed in your Journal in a minimum of 200 words. You read about various internal controls that should be in place for ensuring sound operations and transaction processing. Internal control is a favorite topic of auditing students, since a lot of the internal controls you learned about can be applied to your jobs right now! Students enjoy bringing these internal control suggestions to their supervisors to improve processes. What are some control weaknesses you now see at your current (or past) jobs that you did not see before? What are your suggested improvements? If you do not have work experience to apply internal controls to, what are some controls you learned about that you were not aware of previously? Explain those controls and how they help prevent errors and fraud.

Paper For Above instruction

Internal controls play a crucial role in ensuring the accuracy, efficiency, and integrity of an organization’s operations. Reflecting on my previous employment experiences, I now recognize several weaknesses that could compromise operational effectiveness and facilitate errors or fraud. One significant control weakness observed was the lack of segregation of duties. In many instances, the same individual was responsible for both recording transactions and reconciling accounts, increasing the risk of fraudulent activities or mistakes going unnoticed. To improve this, organizations should assign different personnel to handle these responsibilities, thereby creating checks and balances that deter fraudulent efforts and enhance accuracy.

Another weakness was inadequate oversight of cash handling and inventory management. In the past, cash receipts were not always promptly recorded or deposited, leading to potential misappropriation or errors. Implementing strict controls such as daily cash reconciliations, secure cash storage, and regular inventory audits could significantly mitigate these risks. Additionally, lack of clear authorization protocols for expenses and purchases meant some transactions were processed without proper approval, increasing susceptibility to unauthorized spending. Establishing a formal approval process for all expenditures would serve as an effective control to prevent fraud and errors.

From a theoretical perspective, I have learned about controls such as mandatory vacations and job rotation, which are designed to prevent fraud through continuous checks by different personnel. Mandatory vacations require employees to take time off, during which others review their work, potentially revealing irregularities. Job rotation helps identify discrepancies in processes by having personnel switch roles periodically, offering diverse perspectives and scrutiny. These controls act as deterrents to internal fraud and support ongoing operational oversight.

Furthermore, technological controls such as computerized audit trails and access restrictions significantly bolster internal controls. For example, restricting system access based on job roles ensures that sensitive information or transaction processing capabilities are limited to authorized personnel only, reducing the risk of unauthorized actions or data manipulation. Automated transaction logs enable auditors to track activities precisely and detect anomalies promptly. These controls are essential for maintaining information integrity and preventing fraudulent activities.

Overall, the implementation of robust internal controls, including segregation of duties, authorization protocols, technological safeguards, and oversight mechanisms, can dramatically improve organizational stability and accountability. Recognizing weaknesses in current or past workplaces underscores the importance of continuous improvement in control systems. Applying these controls not only prevents errors and fraud but also fosters a culture of transparency and ethical behavior within organizations.

References

• Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., Albrecht, C. O., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2019). Fraud Examination (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2017). Auditing and Assurance Services (16th ed.). Pearson.
• Cosserat, C., & McLaren, R. (2018). Internal Control: Guidance for Small and Mid-Size Businesses. Institute of Internal Auditors.
• Moeller, R. R. (2013). Brink's Modern Internal Auditing: A Common Body of Knowledge (7th ed.). Wiley.
• Spencer Pickett, K. H. (2018). Internal Control in Organizations. Routledge.
• Singleton, T., & Singleton, A. J. (2010). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. John Wiley & Sons.
• U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2020). Internal Control and Fraud Prevention. SEC Compliance Guide.
• Weirich, T. R. (2018). Contemporary Auditing: Real Issues and Cases (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Whittington, O. R., & Pany, K. (2018). Principles of Auditing and Assurance. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Institute of Internal Auditors. (2017). International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.