Provide Suitable Examples About Your Research – 10 Marks

Provide Suitable Examples About Your Research 10 Marks

Provide suitable examples about your research (10 marks).

Construct null and alternative hypothesis (20 marks).

Suggest the method used for testing the hypothesis (10 marks).

Give reason for your suggestions (10 marks).

The example involves diabetics with a mean blood sugar level of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. A researcher suspects that eating dates could influence blood sugar levels. A sample of 30 patients who regularly eat dates has a mean blood sugar level of 140. The goal is to test whether eating dates affects blood sugar levels in diabetics.

Step 1: State the null hypothesis: H₀: μ = 100 (dates had no effect).

Step 2: State the alternative hypothesis: H₁: μ ≠ 100 (dates had an effect). This is a two-tailed test.

Step 3: Determine the level of significance: 0.05, which indicates a 5% risk of concluding a difference exists when there is none. The critical value corresponding to this significance level for a z-test is 1.96.

Step 4: Select the appropriate test: Given the large sample size (n = 30) and known population standard deviation, a z-test is suitable. Z-tests assess whether a sample mean significantly differs from a population mean when the population standard deviation is known and the sample size exceeds 30.

Step 5: Calculate the z-test statistic:

\[ z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{\sigma / \sqrt{n}} \]

where \(\bar{x} = 140\), \(\mu = 100\), \(\sigma = 15\), and \(n=30\).

Calculation: \( z = \frac{140 - 100}{15 / \sqrt{30}} = \frac{40}{15 / 5.477} \approx \frac{40}{2.743} \approx 14.58 \).

Step 6: Conclusion: Since the calculated z-value (14.58) exceeds the critical value (1.96), the null hypothesis is rejected. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that eating dates significantly affects blood sugar levels in diabetics.

The hypothesis is a tentative explanation or assumption that can be tested through experimentation or data analysis. Null hypotheses posit no effect or difference, serving as a default position, while alternative hypotheses suggest a significant effect. Hypothesis testing involves multiple steps: formulating hypotheses, selecting an appropriate statistical test, choosing a significance level, collecting data, calculating the test statistic, and making a decision based on comparison with the critical value. A rejection of the null hypothesis indicates statistically significant results supporting the alternative hypothesis, whereas failure to reject suggests insufficient evidence to support a claimed effect.

In this study, the z-test was suitable due to the known population standard deviation and sizeable sample. The rejection of the null hypothesis indicates that date consumption likely influences blood sugar among diabetics. However, researchers should also consider potential errors: Type I error (falsely rejecting a true null hypothesis) and Type II error (failing to reject a false null hypothesis). The level of significance (α = 0.05) controls the risk of Type I error, whereas statistical power influences Type II error. Recognizing whether a one-tailed or two-tailed test is appropriate depends on the research question: whether the effect can be in either direction or expected in a specific direction. In this case, a two-tailed test is appropriate, as the researcher seeks to detect any significant difference, positive or negative.

Overall, hypothesis testing is indispensable in medical research, enabling investigators to make data-driven decisions, assess the efficacy of interventions, and validate theoretical models. It provides a systematic framework for interpreting data critically, ensuring scientific rigor and integrity in conclusions derived from experimental data.

Paper For Above instruction

Provision of relevant research examples and formulation of hypotheses are fundamental steps in the scientific investigation process. Hypothesis testing provides a structured approach to evaluate whether observed data support a specific claim or theory, thereby underpinning the scientific method's validity. The example involving diabetics and date consumption illustrates the practical application of statistical hypotheses, with the objective of determining if dietary habits influence blood sugar levels.

In the given scenario, the population of diabetics has a mean blood sugar level of 100 with a standard deviation of 15. A sample of 30 patients who regularly consume dates shows a mean blood sugar level of 140. To assess whether the date-eating behavior affects blood sugar, the researcher would formulate a null hypothesis (H₀) stating that dates have no effect—implying the true mean remains at 100—and an alternative hypothesis (H₁) suggesting that dates do have an effect, either increasing or decreasing blood sugar levels.

The choice of a two-tailed test reflects the possibility of an effect in either direction. The significance level is set at 0.05, meaning there is a 5% risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. The critical z-value corresponding to this significance level is approximately 1.96. Since the population standard deviation is known, a z-test is appropriate, facilitating comparison between the observed sample mean and the population parameter.

The calculation of the z-test statistic involves substituting the sample mean, population mean, standard deviation, and sample size into the formula: z = (X̄ - μ) / (σ / √n). Performing this calculation yields a z-value substantially higher than the critical value, which leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis. The conclusion is that there is statistically significant evidence to support the hypothesis that eating dates influences blood sugar levels in diabetics.

Hypotheses in scientific research serve as the starting point for empirical analysis. The null hypothesis often embodies the default assumption of no effect, serving to prevent false claims of significance. The alternative hypothesis represents the researcher's suspicion or claim of a real effect. Hypothesis testing integrates data collection, statistical analysis, and decision rules to ascertain the likelihood that observed differences are due to random variation or reflect genuine effects.

Understanding the potential for Type I and Type II errors is crucial. A Type I error occurs when the null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected—suggesting an effect where none exists—while a Type II error involves failing to reject a false null hypothesis, missing a real effect. The researcher controls for these errors by setting the significance level and ensuring adequate statistical power through appropriate sample sizes.

The distinction between one-tailed and two-tailed tests depends on the research question. In biological or medical studies where effects can go in either direction, a two-tailed test is prudent. Conversely, if the hypothesis specifically predicts an increase or decrease, a one-tailed test might be justified. In this case, since the researcher is open to observing either an increase or decrease in blood sugar due to date consumption, a two-tailed test is appropriate.

This example underscores the practical significance of hypothesis testing in health sciences. It enables researchers to make objective decisions based on data, minimizing subjective bias and enhancing reproducibility. Proper application of hypotheses, testing methods, and interpretation frameworks ensures that findings contribute meaningfully to scientific knowledge, informing clinical practices, dietary recommendations, and policymaking aimed at improving health outcomes.

References

• Altman, D. G. (2015). Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage Publications.
• Moore, D. S., Notz, W. I., & Fligner, M. A. (2013). The Basic Practice of Statistics. W.H. Freeman.
• Rohlf, F. J., & Sokal, R. R. (1981). Statistical Tables. W.H. Freeman.
• Lehmann, E. L., & Romano, J. P. (2005). Testing Statistical Hypotheses. Springer.
• Devore, J. L. (2015). Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences. Cengage Learning.
• Wasserman, L. (2004). All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference. Springer.
• Hogg, R. V., McKean, J., & Craig, A. T. (2013). Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. Pearson.
• Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2009). Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. Pearson.
• Kirk, R. E. (2013). Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Sage Publications.