Psy 636 Milestone One Guidelines And Rubric Intervention Pla

Psy 636 Milestone One Guidelines And Rubric Intervention Plan Overvie

Psy 636 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric: Intervention Plan Overview Prompt : The overview should include a brief description of a treatment plan for a diagnosis of your choice and should indicate why this diagnosis could potentially be a result of the child’s or adolescent’s involvement in the legal system. The paper should also explore ethical considerations when deciding the best therapeutic interventions to implement, such as individual or family therapy. As an example, a child is exhibiting self-harming behavior. The self-harming behavior started after the child was placed in a foster home. You should exhibit an evaluation based on the cultural, social, and environmental factors affecting the child.

The introduction will be submitted in the form of a one- to two-page paper. Format : The assignment should follow these formatting guidelines: 1–2 pages, double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and citations in APA format. Instructor feedback : Students can find their feedback in the Grade Center. Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value Intervention Plan: Treatment Overview Meets “Proficient†criteria and provides insightful references (18-20) Includes a description of a treatment plan for a diagnosis (16-17) A description of a treatment plan for a diagnosis is not well developed (14-15) A description of a treatment plan for a diagnosis is not evident ( Intervention Plan: Legal System Involvement and Impact Meets “Proficient†criteria and position is substantiated by scholarly research (18-20) Includes an explanation of the potential impact of the legal system on the child/adolescent (16-17) An explanation of the potential impact of the legal system on the child/adolescent lacks specific detail (14-15) An explanation of the potential impact of the legal system on the child/adolescent is not evident ( Intervention Plan: Ethical Considerations Meets “Proficient†criteria substantiated by scholarly research (18-20) Includes a description of potential ethical considerations when choosing a treatment plan (16-17) A description of potential ethical considerations when choosing a treatment plan lacks specific detail (14-15) A description of potential ethical considerations when choosing a treatment plan is not evident ( Organization Applies highly effective pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate (18-20) Applies clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate (16-17) Does not sufficiently apply clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate (14-15) Organization of ideas is not evident ( Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (18-20) Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax (16-17) Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (14-15) Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas ( Earned Total Comments 100%)

Paper For Above instruction

The intersection between the legal system and mental health treatment for children and adolescents is complex and multifaceted. Developing an appropriate intervention plan requires careful consideration of the diagnosis, potential influence of legal involvement, ethical implications, and cultural, social, and environmental factors affecting the young individual. This paper presents a treatment overview for a child exhibiting self-harming behaviors linked to environmental changes, evaluates the impact of legal system involvement, explores ethical considerations in intervention choices, and discusses how these factors shape effective and ethical therapeutic approaches.

Introduction

Children and adolescents involved in the legal system often present with mental health challenges that are compounded by their legal circumstances. The need for targeted, effective, and ethically sound treatment plans is paramount to promote healing and resilience. In this context, a common diagnosis among youth involved in the legal system is non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), often a maladaptive coping mechanism in response to environmental stressors (Nock et al., 2013). Identifying appropriate interventions necessitates an understanding of the child's unique circumstances, including the influence of legal system involvement, and ethical issues surrounding treatment selection.

Intervention Plan: Treatment Overview

A comprehensive treatment plan for a child engaging in NSSI would begin with thorough assessment and diagnosis, utilizing tools such as clinical interviews, behavioral assessments, and standardized questionnaires (Klonsky et al., 2011). Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) tailored for self-harm behaviors has demonstrated efficacy in reducing NSSI incidents by addressing underlying emotional dysregulation and maladaptive beliefs (Hawton et al., 2016). Additionally, dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) has gained recognition for its focus on emotional regulation skills and impulse control, particularly effective with adolescents who self-harm (Linehan et al., 2015). Family therapy or involving caregivers may also be incorporated to improve communication, foster understanding, and build a supportive environment (Wolff et al., 2014). Cultural competence in therapy is critical, ensuring interventions are respectful of the child's cultural background and address culturally specific stressors (Sue et al., 2009). Environmental factors such as placement in foster care, exposure to trauma, or societal stigmatization should be integrated into the treatment plan, tailoring interventions to the child's specific context.

Legal System Involvement and Impact

The child's involvement with the legal system can influence treatment approaches significantly. Legal involvement, such as detention or mandated therapy, may impose constraints on treatment autonomy and engagement (Henggeler & Schoenwald, 2011). For instance, placement in foster care often introduces instability and triggers emotional distress, exacerbating behaviors like self-harm (Chen et al., 2014). Moreover, involvement in juvenile justice proceedings may stigmatize the child, reduce their motivation to cooperate, and infringe on their rights, impacting therapeutic rapport (Chamberlain & Smith, 2013). Conversely, the legal system can serve as a facilitator, providing access to mental health services that may not be otherwise available (Hudson et al., 2016). Treatment plans must consider the legal mandates, confidentiality boundaries, and the child's right to participation, ensuring ethical compliance while promoting effective intervention. Collaboration between mental health providers, legal personnel, and caregivers fosters a coordinated approach that respects the child's legal rights and therapeutic needs (Baird & Wagner, 2013).

Ethical Considerations

Ethical considerations are integral to designing and implementing treatment plans for children involved in the legal system. The primary ethical principles—beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice—must guide clinical decision-making (American Psychological Association, 2017). Respecting the child's autonomy involves obtaining informed assent and involving them in treatment decisions whenever possible, mindful of their developmental capacity (Koocher & Keith-Spiegel, 2014). Balancing parental authority and the child's best interests is crucial, especially when legal constraints limit the child's participation (Koocher et al., 2015). Ensuring confidentiality poses challenges in mandated treatment contexts; clinicians must navigate legal obligations that may restrict disclosure while maintaining trust (Barnes et al., 2018). Cultural sensitivity and awareness of systemic biases are essential to prevent marginalization and ensure equitable care (Craig et al., 2018). Ethical dilemmas, such as involuntary hospitalization, must be approached cautiously, emphasizing least restrictive alternatives and ongoing assessment of the child's capacity to participate in treatment planning (Skeem & Munetz, 2014).

Conclusion

Developing an effective intervention plan for children involved in the legal system necessitates a holistic approach that considers the diagnosis, environmental influences, legal context, and ethical principles. Tailoring evidence-based therapies such as CBT or DBT to address self-harming behaviors, while ensuring cultural competence and ethical integrity, optimizes treatment outcomes. Collaboration among mental health professionals, legal practitioners, and families is essential to create a supportive environment conducive to healing and resilience for vulnerable youth.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. APA.
  • Baird, P., & Wagner, M. (2013). Juvenile justice and mental health: Forging effective partnerships. Journal of Juvenile Law, 37(2), 123-135.
  • Chamberlain, P., & Smith, B. (2013). Collaboration between mental health and justice systems. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 18(4), 204-211.
  • Chen, H., et al. (2014). Impact of foster care placement on adolescent mental health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(4), 632-643.
  • Hawton, K., et al. (2016). Self-harm in adolescents: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(4), 373-385.
  • Henggeler, S. W., & Schoenwald, S. K. (2011). Evidence-based practices for juvenile offenders. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 20(2), 171-182.
  • Hudson, J., et al. (2016). Access to mental health services for juvenile offenders. Children and Youth Services Review, 64, 236-242.
  • Klinowski, A., et al. (2011). Behavioral assessment tools for youth self-injury. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 863-871.
  • Koocher, G. P., & Keith-Spiegel, L. (2014). Ethics in Psychology and Education: Addressing Cross-Cultural Considerations. Wiley.
  • Linehan, M. M., et al. (2015). Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents. Guilford Publications.
  • Nock, M. K., et al. (2013). Self-injury among adolescents: Prevalence and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(12), 1251-1259.
  • Sue, D. W., et al. (2009). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice. Wiley.
  • Skeem, J., & Munetz, M. (2014). Ethical issues in juvenile mental health testing and treatment. Ethics & Behavior, 24(4), 317–330.
  • Wolff, J. C., et al. (2014). Family involvement in adolescent therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(2), 196-205.

Related Assignments