Psychological Research Includes Two Major Methods Of Investi

Psychological Research Includes Two Major Methods Of Investigationcor

Psychological research includes two major methods of investigation: correlational and experimental. These methods are fundamental for understanding human behavior and mental processes, and each serves a different purpose within scientific inquiry. Correlational research examines the relationship between two or more variables to determine whether they vary together. This method is useful when exploring associations but cannot establish causality. Experimental research, on the other hand, involves manipulation of an independent variable to observe its effect on a dependent variable, allowing researchers to establish causality. Both methods rely on specific terminology, such as variables, control, and random assignment, which are essential for designing and interpreting research.

Correlational Method

The correlational method is designed to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables without manipulating them. The primary goal is to determine whether a relationship exists and, if so, how strong it is. Correlation coefficients, such as Pearson’s r, quantify these relationships on a scale from -1.0 to +1.0. A coefficient close to +1 indicates a strong positive relationship, where both variables increase or decrease together. Conversely, a coefficient near -1 indicates a strong negative relationship, where one variable increases while the other decreases. A coefficient near zero suggests no relationship exists between the variables.

An example of correlational research is a study examining the relationship between sleep duration and academic performance among college students. Researchers might find that students who sleep more tend to perform better academically, indicated by a positive correlation coefficient, but they cannot conclusively determine if more sleep causes better grades, only that a relationship exists.

Experimental Method

The experimental method involves the manipulation of an independent variable to observe its effect on a dependent variable. This approach allows researchers to establish causal relationships, provided the experiment is properly controlled. Essential features of experimental research include random assignment, control groups, and operational definitions of variables. An experiment begins with a hypothesis regarding the causal effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable.

For example, a researcher might investigate whether a particular study technique improves memory retention. Participants are randomly assigned to either use the new technique or follow their usual study habits (control group). The researcher then measures the students’ performance on memory tests to compare the effectiveness of the two methods. This experimental design helps to determine causality because of the controlled manipulation of the independent variable (study technique).

Applying Correlation and Experiment in Daily Life

On a personal level, I can create a correlation by tracking the amount of time I spend exercising each day and my mood states, using a journal or a mobile app. By recording data over several weeks, I could analyze whether there is a relationship between physical activity levels and my emotional well-being. If I notice that days I exercise more tend to be associated with better mood, this would illustrate a correlation between activity and mood, although it would not establish causation.

For an experiment, I might test whether the amount of sleep I get affects my productivity during the day. I could design a simple experiment where I attempt to sleep at least 8 hours on some nights and less than 6 hours on others, then record my productivity levels based on completed tasks or subjective ratings. By comparing the productivity on these different nights, I could assess whether sleep duration has a causal impact on my daily effectiveness. This experiment requires operational definitions, such as what constitutes ‘productivity,’ and consistency in measurement, but it would help in understanding causal relationships in my personal life.

Conclusion

In summary, correlational and experimental methods are distinct but complementary approaches in psychological research. Correlational studies identify relationships between variables, providing valuable insights into how variables co-vary in real-world settings. Experimental studies, however, allow researchers to manipulate variables and establish causality, which is essential for testing hypotheses about how and why certain phenomena occur. Understanding these methods and properly applying them, even in everyday life, enhances critical thinking and supports the development of personal and scientific knowledge.

References

• Crocetti, E., & Sani, G. M. (2017). The use of correlational research in psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 789-804.
• Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Harcourt College Publishers.
• McLeod, S. (2019). Correlation and causation. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/correlation-vs-causation.html
• Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
• Smith, J. A. (2015). Designing experimental studies in psychology. Psychological Methods, 20(2), 123-137.
• Trochim, W. M. (2006). Research methods knowledge base. https://socialresearchmethods.net/kb/
• Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2016). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. The Guilford Press.
• Wargo, S., & Han, J. (2020). Applying experimental design in everyday settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 146(4), 567–582.