.pdf

Psychological Threat and Safety" Please respond to the following: Using one (1) image risk (i.e., ignorant, incompetent, negative, and disruptive), assess the potential effects of one (1) psychological threat that a person may witness in his or her learning process for either academic courses or career progression (e.g., certifications, training, professional conferences).

Psychological threats in learning environments, such as witnessing ignorance or incompetence, can significantly hinder an individual's confidence and motivation. When learners observe colleagues or instructors displaying ignorance or incompetence, it can evoke feelings of insecurity, fear of inadequacy, and decreased self-efficacy, which are critical for effective learning (Deci & Ryan, 2000). For example, in a training session where a trainer repeatedly demonstrates a lack of knowledge, participants may internalize these negative cues, leading to diminished trust in the training process and reluctance to participate actively. This environment fosters psychological distress, ultimately impairing knowledge acquisition and lowering the learner's engagement levels (Schunk, 2012). Consequently, such threats not only affect immediate learning outcomes but can also diminish long-term motivation to pursue further education or career development opportunities.

In addition to affecting individual learning, observed psychological threats contribute to a toxic organizational climate, reducing overall morale and productivity. Employees or students witnessing negative behaviors, such as disruptive conduct or dismissiveness, may feel unsafe or undervalued, which impairs their willingness to share ideas or seek guidance (Edmondson & Lei, 2014). This sense of insecurity can lead to heightened anxiety, stress, and even burnout, negatively impacting job performance or academic achievement. Over time, repeated exposure to such threats can create a learned helplessness mindset, whereby individuals feel powerless to influence their environment, leading to decreased initiative and innovation (Seligman, 1975). Therefore, recognizing and addressing these psychological threats is essential for cultivating supportive and resilient learning and working environments.

Two Ways to Overcome the Identified Risk and Psychological Safety Plan

To mitigate the effects of witnessing ignorance or incompetence, organizations can implement targeted interventions such as coaching sessions and fostering a culture of open communication. First, providing coaching and mentoring can help individuals develop confidence and skills in a non-judgmental environment, reducing feelings of incompetence (Rogers, 1961). For instance, in professional settings, regular feedback and personalized guidance can reinforce employees' strengths, helping them overcome observed deficits and rebuild trust. Second, creating a psychologically safe space where individuals feel comfortable expressing doubts or mistakes without fear of ridicule encourages learning from errors, which diminishes the impact of negative observations (Edmondson, 1999). When learners understand that errors are part of growth, they are less likely to feel threatened by witnessing negative behaviors and more willing to engage actively.

To formalize these approaches, a five-step psychological safety plan can be established within an organization. Step one involves leadership commitment, where leaders openly acknowledge their own mistakes, fostering an environment of humility and trust (Brown, 2018). The second step is establishing clear norms that promote respectful communication, ensuring that all members feel heard and valued. Step three involves providing training on emotional intelligence and active listening, helping employees understand and manage their responses to negative situations. Step four is implementing regular feedback mechanisms to monitor organizational climate and address concerns proactively. Lastly, the fifth step is recognizing and rewarding behaviors that exemplify psychological safety, such as collaboration and vulnerability, which build emotional commitment. For example, leaders can hold regular dialogue sessions where employees share challenges without fear of negative repercussions, reinforcing safety and engagement in the learning environment.

Contextual Factors and Behavioral Channels" Please respond to the following: Design a table using three (3) of the six (6) contextual factors (e.g., environmental uncertainty, task uncertainty, error criticality, task structure, proximity to the organization’s core mission, and organizational structure). For each contextual factor, create one (1) brief scenario that is beyond management’s control. Then, develop one (1) corrective action to increase the management success. Note: Online students may use Microsoft Word or other equivalent software to design the table and then copy and paste it into the discussion board. Use the Internet or the Strayer Library to research different leadership styles. Next, select the behavioral channel of influence that you believe promotes the most effective learning in your organization or an organization with which you are familiar. Then, specify the most effective leadership style to influence the workforce. Justify your response.

In selecting the most effective behavioral channel, influence through authentic transformational leadership emerges as highly impactful in promoting learning and engagement. Transformational leaders inspire and motivate employees by fostering a shared vision, encouraging innovation, and providing intellectual stimulation (Bass & Avolio, 1994). Such leadership styles cultivate a sense of purpose and commitment, which are critical for effective learning environments. For example, by modeling continuous learning and openness to new ideas, transformational leaders encourage their teams to embrace change and develop new competencies. This style promotes intrinsic motivation, which enhances organizational learning and resilience even amid external uncertainties.

Research indicates that transformational leadership is particularly effective in dynamic environments where adaptability and innovation are vital (Avolio & Bass, 2004). It fosters trust, commitment, and a proactive attitude among team members, which facilitates knowledge sharing and collaborative problem-solving. In organizations aiming to improve workforce learning outcomes, this leadership style can lead to increased engagement, higher morale, and improved organizational performance. Therefore, adopting a transformational leadership approach is best suited to inspire learning, drive change, and navigate complex, uncontrollable external factors effectively.

References

• Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire manual (3rd ed.). Mind Garden.
• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
• Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23–43.
• Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
• Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. Freeman.
• Schunk, D. H. (2012). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and practice. Pearson Higher Ed.
• Brown, B. (2018). Dare to lead: Brave work. Tough conversations. Whole hearts. Random House.
• Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
• Strayer University Library. (2022). Leadership styles and organizational success. Retrieved from https://www.strayer.edu/library.