Psychology Of Social Change: Have You Ever Been Torn Between

Psychology Social Changeoverviewhave You Ever Been Torn Between Patron

Describe the personal factors that guide your ethical decision making when choosing to support (or not support) a specific cause.

Describe the social factors that guide your ethical decision making when choosing to support (or not support) a specific cause.

Describe one way that you can decrease cognitive dissonance in order to realign your ideals and actions.

Describe one way that you can increase cognitive consonance in order to realign your ideals and actions.

Paper For Above instruction

The intersection of personal values, social influences, and cognitive processes plays a crucial role in shaping ethical decision-making, particularly when engaging with causes that align or conflict with one's ideals. Understanding these dynamics is essential for fostering ethical consistency and contributing meaningfully to social change. This essay explores how personal factors such as individual morals, past experiences, and emotional convictions influence support or opposition to causes. Simultaneously, social factors—including cultural norms, peer influences, societal expectations, and community values—exert significant pressure on ethical choices. Recognizing these influences allows individuals to respond consciously rather than impulsively, thereby promoting ethical integrity.

From a personal perspective, core values and moral principles serve as guiding stars in ethical decision-making. For example, a commitment to social justice or equality often guides my support for causes addressing disparities or advocating for marginalized groups. Past experiences—such as witnessing injustice or benefiting from equitable practices—also shape my support decisions. Emotional reactions, such as empathy or moral outrage, further influence my choices, encouraging me to act in ways that align with my inner convictions. These personal factors serve as internal compass points, steering me towards causes that resonate with my moral identity while discouraging those that conflict with my core beliefs.

On the social front, societal expectations and peer influences significantly impact ethical decisions. For example, pressure from family, community, or professional networks can sway my support for or against particular causes. Cultural norms and societal narratives surrounding issues like environmental sustainability, human rights, or economic justice shape perceptions of what is deemed socially acceptable or honorable. Recognizing the role of social influences allows me to critically evaluate whether my support aligns with my personal values or is merely conforming to external pressures. By cultivating awareness of these social forces, I can make more autonomous and authentic ethical choices, balancing societal expectations with personal convictions.

To decrease cognitive dissonance— the psychological discomfort resulting from conflicting beliefs and actions— I can engage in reflective practices such as journaling or seeking feedback. These activities facilitate self-awareness and help clarify the roots of my conflicting beliefs, enabling me to adjust either my actions or my perspectives to achieve greater internal consistency. For instance, if I support a cause but recognize inconsistencies with my personal values, I might seek additional information or reconsider my support to align my behavior with my ethics better. This conscious reflection helps reduce inner conflict and restores psychological harmony.

Conversely, increasing cognitive consonance involves actively aligning actions with values, which can be achieved through goal-setting and behavioral commitment. For example, I can set specific, measurable objectives that reinforce my support for causes I believe in, such as volunteering or advocating within my community. Reinforcing these behaviors through positive feedback or social reinforcement further solidifies my commitment, making it easier to maintain consistency between my ideals and actions. Over time, this practice fosters a sense of integrity and authenticity, empowering me to act in accordance with my principles even amid external pressures.

References

• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
• Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 1-26.
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
• Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social-cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101830.
• Stavropoulos, S. A., & Becker, M. W. (2020). The role of social norms in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 461–471.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
• Fraley, R. C., & Roberts, B. W. (2005). Patterns of adult attachment: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 53-105.
• Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy theory. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340.
• Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. Praeger.