Psychology Theories Of Personality Module Two Journal Templa

Psychology Theories Of Personalitymodule Two Journal Templatefirst

Psychology – Theories of Personality Module Two Journal Template First, you may want to revisit your submission for the Module One Journal assignment. Next, complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information. • Describe what a psychoanalyst like Freud or Jung would be looking for in the responses to a projective test like the Thematic Apperception Test. Your response should be 2 to 5 sentences in length. • Using the lens of a psychoanalyst, reflect on your Module One Journal responses by answering the following questions in 2 to 5 sentences each: o Describe what role your unconscious might have played in your responses. Are there any defense mechanisms present in your story? o Describe how you characterized any underlying conflicts present in your story. Think about drives and the parts of personality (id, ego, superego) in your response. o Describe how you characterized the interactions of the people in your story. What could this tell us about attachment and relationships? o Describe how much your own life experience informed the story you told. • After considering the role of the unconscious and projection in the story you told, describe another interpretation for your image. Your response should be 2 to 5 sentences in length. • Describe what a greater awareness of projection means for other interactions you might have with people in a social or professional setting. Your response should be 2 to 5 sentences in length.

Paper For Above instruction

The responses to the assignment involve a deep exploration of psychoanalytic perspectives on personality and personal stories. When a psychoanalyst like Freud or Jung evaluates responses to a projective test such as the Thematic Apperception Test, they seek to uncover underlying unconscious motives, unresolved conflicts, and core personality structures. They interpret the narratives or images generated by individuals as reflections of their internal world, including repressed desires, fears, and internal conflicts that influence their behaviors and attitudes (McLeod, 2019).

Reflecting on my Module One Journal responses through a psychoanalytic lens, I recognize that my unconscious likely played a significant role in shaping my responses. For instance, certain themes or emotional tones I described could have been influenced by repressed memories or feelings I am not fully aware of. Defense mechanisms such as repression or projection might have been at play, shielding me from confronting uncomfortable truths or displacing feelings onto external objects or people (Freud, 1915).

In describing underlying conflicts within my stories, I considered the dynamic interplay between drives—such as the id’s impulsiveness, the ego’s reality-centered moderation, and the superego’s moral constraints. These conflicts often manifest in internal struggles communicated through the stories I told, revealing ongoing tensions between desire and societal expectations (Kline, 2011). For example, a story involving avoidance might reflect conflict between my instinctual urges and internalized morals.

The interactions among characters in my stories often mirrored aspects of attachment and relational dynamics. For instance, stories depicting reliance or distance might reveal my underlying attachment patterns—secure or insecure—and how I view relationships and trust. These narrative elements can relay subconscious beliefs about social bonds and emotional safety, informing my current relational behaviors (Bowlby, 1969).

My own life experiences heavily influenced the stories I told. Personal history, familial relationships, and previous experiences with trust and insecurity shape the themes and characters I depict. By analyzing these stories, I can identify how past experiences inform my perceptions and interactions, highlighting the deep connection between my personal history and unconscious drives (Young et al., 2003).

Another interpretation of the image, beyond projection, could consider cultural or societal influences on my perceptions. It’s possible that the themes I saw or associated with in the image were shaped by broader cultural narratives or personal biases rather than purely internal drives (Gibson, 2014). This alternative view emphasizes the external influences that color my internal worldview.

A greater awareness of projection allows for more mindful interactions with others in social or professional settings. Recognizing that some perceptions of others are rooted in our own unconscious processes can foster empathy, reduce misjudgments, and improve communication. This insight promotes healthier relationships by encouraging a reflective stance before reacting to others’ behaviors or statements (Sternberg, 2017).

References

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Volume I. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.

Freud, S. (1915). Repression. In The unconscious (pp. 141-158). Basic Books.

Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception. Psychology Press.

Kline, R. (2011). The psychology of conflict: From the id to the ego and beyond. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 745–757.

McLeod, S. (2019). Thematic Apperception Test (TAT). Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/thematic-apperception-test.html

Sternberg, R. J. (2017). Wisdom, perception, and social interaction. American Psychologist, 72(3), 223–231.

Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide. Guilford Press.