Public Health Assessment Unit 2 Paper: The Health Of The Pub

Public Health Assessment Unit 2 Paperthe Health Of The Public Has Be

The health of the public has become a great concern. Public health deals with the health of a group of people or organization. The purpose of this paper is to differentiate between public and personal health. The paper will also discuss the benefits and disadvantages of public health assessments. Additionally, it will explore the role of public health advocates in resolving health conflicts within society.

It will also identify a specific health concern and the legislation enacted to address it. The paper will explain how public health assessments are utilized to inform public policies. Community health, a major field within clinical and medical sciences, focuses on protecting, improving, and maintaining the health status of communities and populations. It is concerned with prolonging life, preventing disease, and promoting human health through organized efforts by society, organizations, individuals, and communities. Unlike personal health, which centers on an individual’s health, community health deals with large groups or population segments.

Personal health involves individual health records maintained since treatment and emphasizes personal choices regarding exercise, smoking, diet, and family health matters. In contrast, public health assessments evaluate environmental hazards, community concerns, and health outcomes related to harmful waste sites. They help determine if individuals could be affected by contact with hazardous substances, and assess exposure levels and potential health effects.

The benefits of public health assessments include consolidating community concerns, health data, and environmental data in a single report, facilitating policymaker evaluation of health effects prior to legislation. They offer recommendations to minimize adverse health effects while maximizing positive outcomes. Such assessments provide critical information on concentrations of hazardous substances, exposure pathways, and the degree of health risk involved.

However, they also have disadvantages. One limitation is that assessments often focus on a single performance level, primarily the ceiling effect, without considering broader systemic or longitudinal impacts. There is also potential for misuse of assessment data, which can lead to misinformation or unwarranted community panic. Furthermore, conflicts can arise—for example, in homelessness issues—where public health evaluations indicating priority housing for individuals with mental illness may create societal disagreements. Public health advocates and policymakers must work together to manage such conflicts, striving to ensure equitable health outcomes for all community members.

Public health assessments inform policy development by promoting awareness, encouraging public involvement, and supporting environmental health initiatives. They provide a foundation on which policymakers base decisions to mitigate health risks associated with environmental hazards, lifestyle behaviors, and social determinants of health. The policy formulation process involves stakeholder collaboration, problem identification, goal setting, decision-making, conflict resolution, and implementation planning.

An exemplary health concern addressed through public policy is smoking in public places. For instance, on November 8, 2005, Washington state enacted a law prohibiting smoking in all bars and restaurants, building upon the 1985 Clean Indoor Air Act amendment. The law includes restrictions on smoking near exits, windows, entrances, and ventilation intakes within applicable establishments. Such legislation aims to reduce exposure to tobacco smoke, decreasing related health issues such as lung diseases and environmental pollution.

Public health assessments provide crucial evidence used to formulate these policies. They help quantify the extent of health risks, evaluate the effectiveness of existing regulations, and guide future initiatives. For example, data indicating high smoking prevalence among certain demographics can direct targeted interventions. The legislative process takes into account health data, community input, and scientific research to develop regulations that protect public health.

In summary, public health assessments are vital tools in identifying health risks, shaping policies, and promoting health equity. They facilitate informed decision-making, support effective interventions, and foster community engagement. While they have limitations, their role in safeguarding community health remains indispensable.

References

• Boithon, D. (2014). Public health policy and law: A practical guide. Oxford University Press.
• Coughlin, S. S., & Smith, S. (2012). Public health interventions and strategies. Harvard Public Health Review, 39(4), 81-95.
• Hugh H. Tilson. (1988). Benefits of a Community. Notes from the field.
• Registr, U. S. (2013). Public health assessment. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.
• U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (2016). Public health assessments. Atlanta, GA.
• Buchanan, D. R. (2014). An Ethic for Health Promotion: Rethinking the Sources of Human Well Being. Oxford University Press.
• Easterling, D., Gallagher, K., Drisko, J., & Johnson, T. (2010). Promoting Health by Building Capacity: Evidence and Implications for Grantmakers. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, 16(1), 1-20.
• Merritt, M. W., Doris, J. M., & Harman, G. (2010). Character. The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.
• What is a Theory? (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/theory
• Tarrant County, TX. (n.d.). Demographic data and health statistics. Retrieved from https://www.tarrantcounty.com