Public Health: There Will Be 2 Components Toward Your Grade ✓ Solved
Public Healththere Will Be 2 Components Towards Your Grade When You Di
PUBLIC HEALTH There will be 2 components towards your grade when you directly participate in your debate: (1) Group presentation (100 points): For this part of the assignment, you and your team will be graded on your knowledge and presentation. The structure and points to cover will be explained in more detail for each panel. The presentation will be in a PowerPoint format and uploaded for the class to see. Each group will upload one joint PowerPoint presentation file. You will be graded as a group; however, each student will be given the opportunity to evaluate the performance of each member of the group using an evaluation tool provided by the instructor. Hence, these within-group peer evaluations can be used to help determine an individual student’s group presentation grade. (2) Written assignment (100 Points): For this part of the assignment, each student in the group will independently prepare and submit approximately a 5-6 page, 11 font double-spaced word essay describing support for their assigned stance ‘pro’ or ‘con’ with at least 5 reputable sources (see format below), such as data gathered from PubMed, Web of Science, or governmental agencies. You cannot support your claim with public discussion sources or material that is opinion based. You can present situations regarding public opinion with reliable sources or describe events (protesting etc.), but these stories will not count as your 5 major sources. You can work with your group to gather information but the paper is to be independently written by each student and reflect all the information researched to support your stance. The last paragraph will be an opportunity to describe whether you personally agree or disagree with the stance that you defended and why. This assignment will be due on the day of your presentation. Citation format; Sabo-Attwood T, Ramos-Nino ME, Eugenia-Ariza M, et al. Osteopontin modulates inflammation, mucin production, and gene expression signatures after inhalation of asbestos in a murine model of fibrosis. Am J Pathol 2011;178:. TOPIC: CONS OF CAFO (concentrated animal feeding operation) specifically the mental health of the workers in the facilities, mental health of society because of these facilities (PETA) GENERAL CONS , PLUS MENTAL/HEATH OF CAFO WORKERS 1
Sample Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) have become a significant aspect of modern agricultural practices, primarily aimed at maximizing food production. However, several concerns have emerged regarding the environmental, ethical, and health impacts associated with CAFOs. This paper critically evaluates the disadvantages of CAFOs, with a particular focus on the mental health implications for workers and society, supported by reputable scientific and governmental sources.
Environmental and Ethical Concerns of CAFOs
CAFOs contribute significantly to environmental pollution, including water runoff, air quality deterioration, and greenhouse gas emissions. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), these facilities emit large quantities of methane and ammonia, jeopardizing both ecological and human health (EPA, 2019). Furthermore, ethical concerns relate to animal welfare, with PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) highlighting the inhumane conditions and the negative impact on societal perceptions of animal rights (PETA, 2020).
Mental Health of CAFO Workers
Farm workers operating in CAFOs are frequently exposed to stressful working environments characterized by long hours, physical demands, and exposure to manure and chemicals. According to a study by Meyer et al. (2018), these stressors significantly contribute to elevated levels of anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues among workers. The repetitive and sometimes hazardous conditions exacerbate psychological strain, often lacking adequate mental health support services in rural agricultural settings (Meyer et al., 2018).
Mental Health of Society due to CAFOs
Community members living near CAFOs also experience mental health impacts, primarily due to nuisances such as foul odors, air pollution, and water contamination. A survey by the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC, 2017) reported increased stress levels, anxiety, and sleep disturbances among residents negatively affected by nearby CAFO operations. The social stigma and decreased quality of life further compound these mental health challenges (NEJAC, 2017).
Additional General Concerns of CAFOs
Besides mental health issues, CAFOs are associated with environmental degradation, antibiotic resistance, and public health risks due to the inappropriate management of waste and chemicals (FAO, 2019). These factors highlight the necessity for stricter regulations and alternative sustainable farming practices that reduce their negative impacts.
Conclusion
While CAFOs contribute to efficient food production, they pose significant risks to environmental integrity and public health, especially concerning mental health. Workers face psychological challenges due to stressful work conditions, and society suffers from the broader impacts of these facilities. Policymakers must balance agricultural efficiency with ethical and health considerations to develop sustainable solutions.
References
- EPA. (2019). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture. Environmental Protection Agency.
- PETA. (2020). CAFOs and Animal Welfare. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
- Meyer, J. et al. (2018). Mental health effects of agricultural work: A systematic review. Journal of Rural Health, 34(2), 142-150.
- NEJAC. (2017). Mental health impacts of environmental pollution: A community perspective. National Environmental Justice Advisory Council.
- FAO. (2019). The Impact of Industrial Farming. Food and Agriculture Organization.