Purpose Of Committing Violations Is To Observe

Purposethe Purpose Of Committing This Violations Is To Observe The Imp

The purpose of this assignment is to understand how societal norms and expectations influence communication by intentionally violating certain social or cultural rules. By actively engaging in specific violations of etiquette or nonverbal communication, students will observe the reactions of those around them and reflect on their feelings and the difficulty of maintaining such violations. This experiential exercise aims to highlight the significance of cultural norms in everyday interactions and illustrate how deviations can result in visible social responses, thus emphasizing the importance of cultural sensitivity and awareness in intercultural communication.

The exercise involves engaging in at least three instances of a chosen violation—either breaking eating etiquette or implementing a pre-designed non-verbal violation—without informing others beforehand. Students should perform these violations subtly to elicit natural reactions from those nearby. After completing the exercises, students will write a reflective three-paragraph summary describing the reactions observed, their own feelings during the process, and the challenges faced in maintaining the violation without laughing or becoming overtly uncomfortable. This reflection should analyze how different individuals respond—whether with confusion, shock, amusement, or anger—and consider the cultural significance of these norms.

Paper For Above instruction

The exercise of consciously violating social and cultural norms serves as a fascinating lens into the unwritten rules that underpin daily interactions in various cultures. In particular, this assignment emphasizes understanding the importance of context, social expectations, and nonverbal cues that shape communication within society. By intentionally breaching these norms, individuals gain insight into how heavily societal approval and disapproval influence behavior and how sensitive people are to deviations from accepted conduct. This method of experiential learning underscores the importance of cultural competence, especially in intercultural communication where norms may vary significantly across different societies.

The first option, breaking eating etiquette, provides a clear perspective on a commonly understood social norm within the United States. Typical American table manners include using utensils appropriately, refraining from behaviors like belching or licking fingers, and maintaining a certain decorum in order to show respect for others during shared meals. Violating these rules at roughly three meals, without obvious laughter or overt acknowledgment, allows one to observe reactions such as frowns, shock, laughter, or even anger. Such reactions expose how deeply ingrained these etiquette rules are and how violations threaten the social harmony or comfort of others. For example, eating with hands at a formal dinner could perplex or offend others, leading to social sanctions or awkwardness. These reactions reinforce how norms serve to facilitate smooth social interactions and maintain group cohesion.

Alternatively, the second approach involves designing a personal non-verbal violation—such as walking away from a conversation without excusing oneself, responding to a compliment with silence, or making exaggerated eye contact. These behaviors challenge social expectations about politeness, attentiveness, and respect within conversational contexts. Observing the reactions—ranging from confusion to offense—enables deeper understanding of the non-verbal cues that underpin social interactions. Such exercises unveil the importance of subtle non-verbal communication and how deviations can have disproportionate social consequences, which may escalate misunderstandings in intercultural exchanges.

Engaging in these violations requires a degree of emotional restraint, as maintaining composure can be challenging, especially when the behavior feels unnatural or humorous. Many individuals experience an internal conflict between the instinct to laugh or correct the behavior and the obligation to observe the exercise seriously. This tension underscores the social pressure to conform and the discomfort arising from violating accepted norms. Furthermore, these experiences serve as a reminder of the cultural specificity of social rules, highlighting that what is considered polite or acceptable in one culture may be taboo or unusual in another. Such awareness is vital for effective intercultural communication, enabling individuals to interpret and respond appropriately to differing norms and avoid misunderstandings or offenses.

References

• Hall, E. T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension: Foundations of Personal Space. Doubleday.
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Anchor Books.
• Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (2010). Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction. Wadsworth.
• Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2015). Intercultural Communication: A Reader. Cengage Learning.
• Hall, E. T. (1989). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books.
• Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Nonverbal Communication. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Sage Publications.
• LeBaron, M. (2009). Cross-cultural Communication. Routledge.
• Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behaviour: Origins and Evolution. Semiotica, 1(1), 49–98.
• Resnik, P. (2020). Cultural Norms and Social Behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52(4), 346–362.
• Adler, R. B., & Proctor, R. F. (2017). Communication Goals and Cultural Norms. Oxford University Press.