Purpose Of This Assignment Is To Give

Purpose Of Assignmentthe Purpose Of This Assignment Is To Give Learner

The purpose of this assignment is to give learners hands-on experience working with mission, vision, and value statements, and to increase their knowledge of an organization's core competencies. The task involves examining the mission and vision statements of a specific organization, comparing them to those of a similar organization found online, and analyzing their robustness and alignment with strategic goals.

Specifically, learners are required to select an organization, such as their place of employment or a familiar organization, and review its mission, vision, and values statements. They must then find a comparable organization's mission and vision statements via the internet. Using a provided comparison table, they will compare the two organizations' statements.

The assignment involves creating a 1,400-word analysis that covers the following: an evaluation of the robustness of the mission, vision, and values statements; a summary of insights gained from comparing the two organizations; identification and rationale for the organization's core competencies; a brief summary of strategic goals; an assessment of the alignment between the organization's behaviors, goals, and its mission, vision, and values; and a justification of whether the organization truly embodies its stated mission, vision, and values. Additionally, learners must append the completed Mission and Vision Comparison Table to the end of their document.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment aims to deepen understanding of organizational strategic statements and core competencies by engaging in a comparative analysis and strategic evaluation. This comprehensive analysis is essential for developing managerial insights into how mission, vision, and values shape organizational behavior and strategic direction.

To begin, selecting an organization with accessible and clearly articulated mission, vision, and value statements provides an essential foundation for analysis. The chosen organization could be the learner’s employer or another familiar entity whose strategic communications are publicly available or directly accessible.

The initial step involves critically analyzing the selection against established criteria for robust statements. According to management literature (Daft, 2018), effective mission and vision statements are clear, concise, future-oriented, motivational, and aligned with organizational core competencies. They should encapsulate the purpose and aspirations of the organization in a manner that inspires stakeholders. Values statements complement these by defining the ethical and cultural principles that guide behavior.

In comparing the organization’s statements with those of a similar organization found online, it is necessary to evaluate clarity, specificity, aspirational quality, and alignment with core competencies (Collins & Porras, 1996). Robust statements tend to avoid vague or generic language, instead articulating unique organizational qualities and strategic intents. After the comparison, summarizing insights reveals whether the organization’s statements are truly compelling and strategically aligned.

Further, identifying core competencies involves applying the definition by Prahalad and Hamel (1990), which describes core competencies as unique capabilities that provide competitive advantage and are difficult for competitors to imitate. These capabilities often involve specialized skills, technological expertise, or organizational culture. A rationale for selecting core competencies should consider their contribution to strategic differentiation and value creation, reinforcing the organization’s competitive position.

The analysis then shifts to the organization’s strategic goals, typically outlined in strategic plans or corporate documents. Summarizing these goals provides context for evaluating alignment. The critical assessment involves examining whether existing organizational behaviors, resource allocations, and priorities support the mission, vision, and core competencies (Kaplan & Norton, 2001). Conversely, misalignments point to strategic drift or areas requiring realignment.

Finally, the paper should justify whether the organization "lives up" to its stated mission, vision, and values. This involves evaluating organizational culture, decision-making processes, and performance outcomes against these declarations. An organization faithfully embodying its mission and values would demonstrate consistent behaviors, ethical conduct, and strategic initiatives aligned with its stated purpose. Evidence such as employee testimonials, customer feedback, and performance metrics can support this evaluation.

The appended comparison table provides a summarized visual aid supporting the analysis and serves as a quick reference for differences and similarities between the two sets of statements.

References

• Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1996). Building your company's vision. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 65-77.
• Daft, R. L. (2018). Management: A practical introduction. Cengage Learning.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business Press.
• Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
• Management: A Practical Introduction (Additional relevant sources should be included based on research.)