Purpose Of This Assignment Is To Review The Root Causes
The Purpose Of This Assignment Is To Review the Root Causes Of The Pro
The purpose of this assignment is to review the root causes of the problem and all of the previously tried and new solutions you researched to address the problem. From that information, potential solutions should be ranked based upon how well they meet the needs of the business and address the identified problem. Once this process is completed, the best solution for solving the problem within your organization can be selected. Complete the "Problem Solutions Matrix" spreadsheet using data and information you collected through research and completion of the Stakeholder Analysis in Topics 2 and 3. Select the top three solutions for addressing the problem within your organization.
Be sure to consider the "Solutions Score" column number when selecting the top three solutions. Additionally, you must also consider the timeline for implementation, costs and benefits to key stakeholders and the greater good, potential roadblocks to implementation, and how you will measure and validate whether or not a solution is successful in addressing the problem. All of this must be considered prior to selecting your final solution. This information will be used as part of the Business Proposal Presentation in Topic 7 and the Final Business Proposal you submit in Topic 8. Complete the "Problem Solutions Matrix" spreadsheet according to the directions and submit it to your instructor.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Resources : Read "7 Steps to Using Prioritization Matrices," by Bonacorsi (2011), located on the Process Excellence Network website. URL: The "Table of Contents" located on the Research Methods Knowledge Base website can be used to access a wide variety of information about both qualitative and quantitative research and should be used as a resource for developing and conducting both types of research throughout the course. URL: Review "Analyzing, Interpreting and Reporting Basic Research Results," located on the Free Management Library website. URL:
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment aims to systematically analyze the root causes of a specific problem within an organization, evaluate various potential solutions, and select the most effective one based on a comprehensive set of criteria. This process involves creating and utilizing a "Problem Solutions Matrix" spreadsheet, informed by research and stakeholder analysis, to prioritize solutions effectively. Once the top three solutions are identified, considerations such as implementation timeline, costs, stakeholder benefits, potential roadblocks, and success metrics are critical in making a final decision. This structured approach ensures that the chosen solution aligns with organizational needs and maximizes the likelihood of resolving the problem efficiently and sustainably.
Root cause analysis is fundamental to understanding why a problem persists. By thoroughly investigating underlying issues, organizations can avoid treating symptoms and instead address the core problem. According to Cause-and-Effect analysis techniques, such as Fishbone diagrams, pinpointing specific causes allows for targeted solutions (Ishikawa, 1982). In this context, previous solutions attempted by the organization should be reviewed to determine their effectiveness, as well as to identify gaps that new solutions can fill.
The process of solution ranking involves criteria such as feasibility, cost-effectiveness, acceptability to stakeholders, and the potential impact on organizational goals. The Solutions Score column in the spreadsheet provides a quantitative basis for evaluating each alternative. Prioritization matrices serve as practical tools, assisting decision-makers in visualizing trade-offs among various solutions (Bonacorsi, 2011). Such matrices foster rational decision-making, minimizing biases and ensuring transparency.
Furthermore, an in-depth stakeholder analysis enhances the solution selection process by understanding stakeholder interests, influence, and potential resistance (Freeman, 1984). Incorporating stakeholder feedback ensures that solutions not only solve the problem but also gain acceptance, reducing the risk of implementation failure. The selection of the top three solutions follows an integrated assessment considering the Solutions Score, implementation timelines, costs, stakeholder benefits, and potential barriers.
Implementation considerations encompass assessing potential challenges, such as resource constraints, organizational culture, and change management requirements. A detailed analysis helps to develop mitigation strategies for roadblocks, ensuring smoother transitions. Measuring success involves defining clear metrics—such as key performance indicators (KPIs)—and establishing validation processes to verify that the solution effectively addresses the root causes of the problem (Ott et al., 2006).
The final step involves documenting the rationale behind the chosen solution, supported by research evidence and stakeholder input. This comprehensive approach informs the subsequent Business Proposal Presentation and Final Business Proposal, fostering organizational alignment and stakeholder buy-in. The entire process emphasizes careful analysis, evidence-based decision-making, and strategic planning to resolve organizational issues effectively.
References
- Ishikawa, K. (1982). Guide to quality control. Asian Productivity Organization.
- Bonacorsi, D. (2011). 7 Steps to Using Prioritization Matrices. Process Excellence Network. Retrieved from https://www.processexcellencenetwork.com
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
- Ott, J. S., LaWors, S., & Klammer, T. (2006). Measuring organizational performance. Routledge.
- Schermerhorn, J. R. (2011). Management. John Wiley & Sons.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75-85.
- Root, R. (2002). Root cause analysis and process improvement. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 7(4), 317-329.
- Bradley, R., & Huse, M. (2014). Strategic decision making in organizations. Journal of Business Strategy, 35(2), 18-27.
- Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710.
- Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.