Putin's Russia: The Modern Russian State Was Born In 1991

Putins Russiathe Modern Russian State Was Born In 1991 After The Dram

Putin's Russia: The modern Russian state was born in 1991 after the dramatic collapse of the Soviet Union. Early in the post-Soviet era, Russia embraced ambitious policies designed to transform a communist dictatorship with a centrally planned economy into a democratic state with a market-based economic system. The policies, however, were imperfectly implemented. Political reform left Russia with a strong presidency that—in hindsight—had the ability to subvert the democratic process. On the economic front, the privatization of many state-owned enterprises was done in such a way as to leave large shareholdings in the hands of the politically connected, many of whom were party officials and factory managers under the old Soviet system.

Corruption was also endemic, and organized crime was able to seize control of some newly privatized enterprises. In 1998, the poorly managed Russian economy went through a financial crisis that nearly bought the country to its knees. Fast-forward to 2015, and Russia still has a long way to go before it resembles a modern democracy with a functioning free market–based economic system. On the positive side, the economy grew at a healthy clip during most of the 2000s, helped in large part by high prices for oil and gas, Russia’s largest exports (in 2013 oil and gas accounted for 75 percent of all Russian exports). Between 2000 and 2013, Russia’s gross domestic product (GDP) per capita more than doubled when measured by purchasing power parity.

The country now boasts the world’s ninth-largest economy. Thanks to government oil revenues, public debt is also low by international standards—at just 9.2 percent of GDP (in the United States, by comparison, public debt amounts to 70 percent of GDP). Indeed, Russia has run a healthy trade surplus on the back of strong oil and gas exports for the last decade. On the other hand, the economy is overly dependent on commodities, particularly oil and gas. This was exposed in mid-2014 when the price of oil started to tumble as a result of rapidly increasing supply from the United States.

Between mid-2014 and March 2015, the price of oil fell from $110 a barrel to around $50. This drove a freight train through Russia's public finances. Much of Russia’s oil and gas production remains in the hands of enterprises in which the state still has a significant ownership stake. The government has a controlling ownership position in Gazprom and Rosneft, two of the country’s largest oil and gas companies. The government used the rise in oil and gas revenues between 2004 and 2014 to increase public spending through state-led investment projects and increases in wages and pensions for government workers.

While this boosted private consumption, there has been a dearth of private investment, and productivity growth remains low. This is particularly true among many state-owned enterprises that collectively still account for about half of the Russian economy. Now with oil prices tumbling, Russia is having to issue ever more debt to finance public spending. Russian private enterprises are also hamstrung by bureaucratic red tape and endemic corruption. The World Bank ranks Russia 92nd in the world in terms of the ease of doing business and 88th when it comes to starting a business (for comparison, the United States is ranked 4th and 20th, respectively).

Transparency International, which ranks countries by the extent of corruption, ranked Russia 136th out of 175 nations in 2014. The state and state-owned enterprises are famous for pushing work to private enterprises that are owned by political allies, which further subverts market-based processes. On the political front, Russia is becoming less democratic with every passing year. Since 1999, Vladimir Putin has exerted increasingly tight control over Russian politics, either as president or as prime minister. Under Putin, potential opponents have been sidelined, civil liberties have been progressively reduced, and the freedom of the press has been diminished.

For example, in response to opposition protests in 2011 and 2012, the Russian government passed laws increasing its control over the Internet, dramatically raising fines for participating in “unsanctioned” street protests, and expanded the definition of treason to further limit opposition activities. Vocal opponents of the regime—from business executives who do not tow the state line to protest groups such as the punk rock protest band Pussy Riot—have found themselves jailed on dubious charges. To make matters worse, Putin has recently been tightening his grip on the legal system. In late 2013, Russia’s parliament, which is dominated by Putin supporters, gave the president more power to appoint and fire prosecutors, thereby diminishing the independence of the legal system.

Freedom House, which produces an annual ranking tracking freedom in the world, classifies Russia as “not free” and gives it low scores for political and civil liberties. Freedom House notes that in the March 2012 presidential elections, Putin benefited from preferential treatment by state-owned media, numerous abuses of incumbency, and procedural “irregularities” during the vote count. Putin won 63.6 percent of the vote against a field of weak, hand-chosen opponents, led by Communist Party leader Gennadiy Zyuganov, with 17.2 percent of the vote. Under a Putin-inspired 2008 constitutional amendment, the term of the presidency was expanded from four years to six. Putin will be eligible for another six-year term in 2018.

In 2014, Putin burnished his growing reputation for authoritarianism when he took advantage of unrest in Ukraine to annex Crimea and support armed revolt by Russian-speaking separatists in eastern Ukraine. Western powers responded with economic sanctions, and the combination with falling oil prices pushed the Russian economy into recession, growing just 0.6 percent in 2014, while the ruble lost half its value. Despite these economic challenges, Putin’s grip on power remains strong. The political and economic developments in Russia illustrate the complex interplay of reforms, dependence on resource exports, and authoritarian tendencies that shape Russia’s current state and future trajectory.

Paper For Above instruction

Russia’s transition from a Soviet republic to an independent nation marked a critical juncture in its modern history. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 resulted in profound political, economic, and social transformations that aimed to establish a new democratic and market-oriented system. However, these reforms faced significant challenges, which have shaped Russia’s political economy and leadership dynamics to this day. Analyzing Russia's economic performance from 2001 to 2013, the political consolidation under Vladimir Putin, and recent setbacks due to geopolitical conflicts and economic downturns provides insight into the resilience and vulnerabilities of post-communist Russia.

During the early 2000s, Russia experienced robust economic growth, driven primarily by high global prices for oil and gas—its primary exports. From 2000 to 2013, Russia’s GDP per capita more than doubled, reflecting substantial gains in income levels and living standards (World Bank, 2014). This growth was sustained by revenues from energy exports, which financed increased public spending, wages, and pensions. Furthermore, Russia’s economy became the world's ninth-largest, with public debt remaining low at approximately 9.2 percent of GDP, significantly lower than that of many developed economies like the United States (International Monetary Fund, 2015). The trade surplus was maintained largely due to high commodity prices, reinforcing the country’s reliance on resource-dependent economic structures (Central Bank of Russia, 2014).

> However, this economic model revealed its vulnerabilities when global oil prices declined sharply in mid-2014 due to increased US shale oil production and global supply gluts (Economist, 2014). The plunge from over $110 to around $50 per barrel hit Russia hard, squeezing government revenues and undermining fiscal stability. Russia’s dependence on oil and gas exports made it highly susceptible to commodity price fluctuations, exposing the fragility of its economic diversification efforts. Consequently, Russia faced fiscal pressures, increased borrowing, and a depreciating ruble, which contributed to recession conditions in 2014–2015 (World Bank, 2015). The restrictions on private investment, bureaucratic hurdles, and corruption further limit economic efficiency and growth prospects (World Bank, 2014).

> Politically, Vladimir Putin’s ascendancy has been characterized by increasing authoritarianism, consolidating power since 1999. Under Putin, civil liberties and political freedoms have steadily eroded, reflecting a shift away from the democratic reforms attempted in the 1990s. Control over the media, suppression of opposition, and legal measures restricting activism exemplify this trend (Freedom House, 2014). The annexation of Crimea in 2014, justified as defending Russia’s strategic interests, resulted in international sanctions that compounded the economic downturn. Despite decline in economic growth, Putin’s popularity remains high, reflecting a consolidation of political authority rooted in nationalistic rhetoric and control over key institutions (Kremlin, 2015).

> The concentration of power is further reinforced by constitutional amendments extending presidential terms, enabling Putin to maintain leadership well into the future. Nonetheless, this trend raises concerns about the state’s commitment to democratic principles and the long-term stability of Putin’s regime (Putin, 2013). The political environment’s restrictiveness diminishes prospects for genuine political competition, which impacts both domestic governance and international perceptions of Russia’s legitimacy (Freedom House, 2014).

> Economically, the reliance on energy exports and the incomplete implementation of reforms hinder sustainable development. The over-reliance on oil and gas exposes Russia to external shocks, as seen in 2014, and limits diversification into high-value sectors. The pervasive corruption, bureaucratic red tape, and weak legal institutions undermine private investment and business creation (World Bank, 2014). The rankings place Russia low globally in ease of doing business, deterring foreign direct investment (FDI) and diminishing its appeal as a business destination, especially amidst geopolitical tensions. The 2014 sanctions and international isolation further negatively impact FDI, discouraging Western enterprises from engaging with Russia’s economy (UNCTAD, 2015).

> Looking ahead, the sustainability of Russia’s economic and political model remains uncertain. The decline in oil prices, coupled with sanctions and internal governance challenges, threaten economic stability. The political landscape is likely to continue consolidating around Putin’s leadership unless significant reforms are undertaken, which appear unlikely given current trends. The declining attractiveness for foreign investors, especially Western firms wary of sanctions and political risks, suggests decreasing foreign direct investment and further distancing Russia from integration into the global market system.

> In conclusion, Russia’s post-1991 development underscores the complexities of transitioning from authoritarianism and centrally planned economies to democracy and free markets. While economic growth was achieved during high energy price periods, structural vulnerabilities and governance issues limit sustainable progress. The concentration of political power in Putin’s hands and the deterioration of democratic institutions pose significant risks to future stability. Unless substantial reforms are enacted to diversify the economy and strengthen institutions, Russia’s prospects for long-term development remain constrained.

References

• Central Bank of Russia. (2014). Annual Report 2014. Moscow: Central Bank of Russia.
• Economist. (2014). Russia’s Oil Crisis. The Economist. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com
• Freedom House. (2014). Freedom in the World 2014: Russia. Washington, D.C.: Freedom House.
• International Monetary Fund. (2015). Russia: Staff Report for the 2015 Article IV Consultation. IMF.
• Kremlin. (2015). President Vladimir Putin’s Annual Address. Moscow: Kremlin Press.
• Putin, V. (2013). Annual State of the Nation Address. Moscow: Kremlin.
• UNCTAD. (2015). World Investment Report 2015. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
• World Bank. (2014). Russia Economic Report 2014. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
• World Bank. (2015). Global Economic Prospects. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.