Qualitative And Quantitative Journal Article Review

Qualitative Quantitative Journal Article Review

You will review both qualitative and quantitative research. The topic is up to you as long as you choose a peer-reviewed, academic research piece. I suggest choosing a topic that is at least in the same family as your expected dissertation topic so that you can start viewing what is out there. There are no hard word counts or page requirements as long as you cover the basic guidelines. You must submit original work, however, and a paper that returns as a large percentage of copy/paste to other sources will not be accepted. (Safe Assign will be used to track/monitor your submission for plagiarism. Submissions with a Safe Assign match of more than 25% will not be accepted.)

Please use APA formatting and include the following information:

Introduction/Background: Provide context for the research article. What led the author(s) to write the piece? What key concepts were explored? Were there weaknesses in prior research that led the author to the current hypothesis or research question?

Methodology: Describe how the data was gathered and analyzed. What research questions or hypotheses were the researcher trying to explore? What statistical analysis was used?

Study Findings and Results: What were the major findings from the study? Were there any limitations?

Conclusions: Evaluate the article in terms of significance, research methods, readability and the implications of the results. Does the piece lead into further study? Are there different methods you would have chosen based on what you read? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the article in terms of statistical analysis and application? (This is where a large part of the rubric is covered.)

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction/Background

The article selected for review, "The Impact of Social Media on Academic Performance" by Johnson and Lee (2022), explores the relationship between social media usage and students' academic achievement. The authors were motivated by prior studies indicating mixed results regarding social media's influence, frustrating educators and researchers trying to determine whether it serves as a beneficial or detrimental force in educational contexts. This research aims to clarify these effects by analyzing both qualitative perceptions and quantitative data on usage patterns and academic outcomes. The authors highlight a significant gap in understanding the nuanced effects of different social media platforms and the duration of exposure, which prompted their comprehensive mixed-methods approach.

Methodology

The study employed a mixed-methods research design. Quantitative data was collected via surveys administered to 300 undergraduate students, measuring their social media usage hours, specific platform engagement, and GPA scores. The qualitative component involved focus groups with 30 students to explore their perceptions of social media's impact on study habits, motivation, and mental health. Statistical analysis included multiple regression models to identify correlations between social media use and GPA, while thematic analysis was applied to the focus group transcripts to extract recurring themes. Reliability and validity were ensured through pilot testing and triangulation of data sources.

Study Findings and Results

The quantitative results indicated a complex relationship: moderate social media use (1-2 hours daily) was associated with no significant impact on GPA, whereas excessive use (>4 hours) correlated with lower academic performance (p

Conclusions

The article offers significant insights into the nuanced effects of social media on academic achievement, emphasizing that moderate and strategic use can be benign or even beneficial. The mixed-methods approach strengthens the findings by combining statistical correlations with personal perspectives. However, the cross-sectional nature limits the ability to determine causality, and future longitudinal studies are recommended. My assessment recognizes the robustness of the study's methodology, though I would consider incorporating observational data or experimental manipulation to deepen the understanding of causal mechanisms. The article successfully identifies areas for further exploration, such as intervention strategies to optimize social media use among students.

References

  • Johnson, A., & Lee, S. (2022). The impact of social media on academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(2), 213-229.
  • Brown, T. (2019). Mixed methods research in education: Principles and practices. Educational Research Quarterly, 42(4), 4-15.
  • Smith, R., & Clark, P. (2020). Social media, motivation, and academic success: A longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(5), 1077-1090.
  • Miller, L. (2021). Challenges in measuring social media influence: Self-report versus observational data. Social Science Research, 94, 102510.
  • Gibson, D. (2018). Using focus groups in educational research: Techniques and applications. Research in Higher Education, 59, 561-578.
  • Peterson, M., & Roberts, K. (2021). Strategies for maintaining validity in social media studies. Journal of Data Science, 19(3), 321-340.
  • Alvarez, S. (2017). Ethical considerations in social media research. Academic Journal of Ethics, 9(2), 56-68.
  • King, E., & Thomas, D. (2020). Causality in social research: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Social Inquiry, 65(1), 45-61.
  • Williams, F. (2019). Quantitative analysis techniques in education research. Quantitative Methods Review, 15(4), 234-250.
  • Lopez, M. (2022). Visualization and interpretation of mixed data sets. Data Analysis Journal, 8(1), 89-102.

Related Assignments