Qualities Of The Hero: Comparing Gilgamesh And Odysseus

Qualities of the Hero: Comparing Gilgamesh and Odysseus

This comparative essay focuses on analyzing the heroic qualities of Gilgamesh from the Epic of Gilgamesh and Odysseus from Homer's Odyssey, particularly emphasizing their encounters with monsters: Humbaba in the Epic of Gilgamesh and Polyphemus in The Odyssey. The paper will compare their traits as heroes, examine what this reveals about ancient Mesopotamian and Greek cultural ideals, and explore how these insights reflect or influence modern notions of heroism.

Paper For Above instruction

The concept of heroism varies significantly across cultures and historical contexts. Gilgamesh, the Sumerian king, and Odysseus, the Greek hero, embody different qualities reflective of their respective civilizations. Analyzing their encounters with monsters—Humbaba and Polyphemus—provides an insightful lens into their heroic virtues and the cultural values they symbolize.

Gilgamesh is portrayed as a powerful yet initially reckless king who seeks fame and immortality, demonstrating qualities such as strength, bravery, and a desire for eternal legacy. His confrontation with Humbaba, the fearsome guardian of the Cedar Forest, exemplifies these traits. Gilgamesh shows courage and physical prowess as he faces Humbaba, emphasizing the Mesopotamian ideal of a hero admired for martial skill and fearlessness. His willingness to confront and subdue Humbaba reflects a societal admiration for martial strength and dominance, as well as an understanding of heroism rooted in physical conquest and the pursuit of eternal fame.

In contrast, Odysseus’s heroism is characterized by cleverness, resourcefulness, and self-control. His encounter with Polyphemus, the Cyclops, in Book 9 of The Odyssey, underscores these qualities. Odysseus’s strategy to blinds the Cyclops rather than confronting him directly—by devising an escape plan involving deception and cunning—illustrates Greek values emphasizing intelligence over brute strength. Odysseus’s measure of heroism includes wit, diplomacy, and restraint, aligning with the Greek ideal of "arete"—excellence achieved through skill and intelligence rather than sheer force.

Both heroes confront monsters that symbolize chaos and threats to societal order. Humbaba embodies the destructive forces lurking within nature, necessitating heroic conquest to establish civilization. His defeat signifies the civilization’s dominance over chaos, a central theme in Mesopotamian culture. Conversely, Polyphemus represents the dangers lurking beyond civilization, embodying raw, untamed nature and barbarism, which Greek culture seeks to overcome through cleverness and resilience.

The contrasting approaches of Gilgamesh and Odysseus reflect their societies’ differing cultural ideals. The Mesopotamian emphasis on martial prowess and heroism as a means to establish order echoes Gilgamesh’s bravery and physical confrontation with Humbaba. The Greek admiration for wisdom, wit, and moderation is exemplified in Odysseus’s approach to the Cyclops, where intelligence triumphs over brute strength. These differing ideals reveal their respective civilizations' values: Mesopotamian culture emphasized martial strength and eternal glory, while Greek culture valued intelligence and moral virtue.

Modern perceptions of heroism are influenced by these classical ideals. Contemporary media often celebrate physical prowess and adventure, akin to Gilgamesh’s heroic confrontations, exemplified in action movies and superhero stories. Yet, there is also admiration for cleverness, strategic thinking, and resilience, echoing Odysseus’s qualities. In today’s society, role models exemplify these traits variably, with athletes and warriors representing strength, while innovators and strategists embody intelligence. Understanding these ancient cultural ideals enriches our comprehension of modern hero narratives and the qualities we esteem in leaders and role models.

In conclusion, Gilgamesh and Odysseus exemplify contrasting visions of heroism rooted in their cultural contexts. Their encounters with monsters serve as allegories for societal values—strength and conquest in Mesopotamia, wisdom and resilience in Greece. Recognizing these differences helps us appreciate how cultural contexts shape our ideals of heroism and leadership today, influencing everything from popular culture to workplace role models. These ancient heroes continue to inspire by embodying essential qualities that remain relevant in modern society.

References

• Bloom, H. (1995). The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. Harcourt.
• Foster, B. (2014). The Epic of Gilgamesh. Ancient Near Eastern Texts and Contexts. University Press.
• Homer. (1996). The Odyssey. Translated by Robert Fagles. Penguin Classics.
• Kirk, G. S. (1970). The Nature of Greek Heroism. Bristol Classical Press.
• Nagy, G. (1996). Creativity in Greek Myth and Philosophy. Athenian Agora.
• Seale, M. (2004). The Heroic Code in Mesopotamian Myth. Journal of Ancient Civilizations.
• Vernant, J.-P. (1983). The Myth of the Hero in Greek Culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies.
• Wilson, P. (2010). Defining Heroism in Modern Contexts. Cultural Sociology.
• Zimmern, M. (1928). The Myth of Gilgamesh. Classical Quarterly.
• Zimmern, M. (2017). The Homeric Question: Myth and History. London: Routledge.