Quality Improvement And Risk Management Assignment 033868

Ha3110d Quality Improvement And Risk Managementlp052 Assignment Pd

Ha3110d Quality Improvement And Risk Managementlp052 Assignment Pd

HA3110D - Quality Improvement and Risk Management LP05.2 ASSIGNMENT: PDSA Worksheet Discuss the progress of the "Do" stage of your self-improvement project. Directions Complete the Likert Survey and Run Chart for your self-improvement project. Then, in a Word document, report on the following: 1. Define your aim statement. 2. Describe the change you have made, is there more than one? 3. Are your changes evidence based? 4. What data are you collecting and how do you intend to display it? 5. Provide a brief summary of how you have incorporated the PDSA Improvement Model up to this point. (Length: at least words)

Paper For Above instruction

The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is a widely used framework in healthcare quality improvement initiatives, enabling continuous assessment and refinement of interventions. The "Do" stage, which involves implementing changes and collecting data for evaluation, is crucial in translating planning into tangible outcomes. This paper discusses the "Do" stage of my self-improvement project, highlighting progress, data collection, and integration within the PDSA model.

Initially, my aim was to enhance hand hygiene compliance among nursing staff to prevent hospital-acquired infections. The specific objective was to increase compliance rates by 20% over four weeks. The primary change implemented involved introducing visual reminder posters at strategic points in patient care areas and providing brief educational sessions on the importance of hand hygiene. These interventions were selected based on evidence supporting environmental cues and staff education as effective methods for behavioral change in infection control (Erasmus et al., 2010).

The changes made are evidence-based, drawing from multiple studies that demonstrate the efficacy of visual cues and targeted education programs in improving hand hygiene compliance (Biswal et al., 2019; Mahida et al., 2018). These interventions are aligned with guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which advocate for multi-modal strategies to improve compliance and patient safety (CDC, 2021).

Data collection during the "Do" stage focused on observing and recording hand hygiene practices among staff. A Likert survey was utilized to assess staff attitudes and perceived barriers to compliance, with responses ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree on statements related to hand hygiene importance, ease of access to hygiene supplies, and awareness of infection prevention protocols. Additionally, a run chart was created to plot daily compliance rates, derived from direct observations by trained staff members. The run chart visually displays trends, shifts, and patterns in compliance over time, facilitating real-time assessment of intervention effectiveness.

To display the collected data, I plan to use the run chart to identify shifts or trends indicating improvement or resistance to change. The Likert survey results will be analyzed quantitatively to gauge staff perceptions and attitudes, which are important for understanding behavioral aspects influencing compliance. Combining these data sources provides a comprehensive view of the intervention's impact from both an observable behavior and an attitudinal perspective, supporting informed decisions for further modifications.

Thus far, I have incorporated the PDSA model by thoroughly planning interventions based on evidence, executing the change in the "Do" stage, and systematically collecting data to evaluate impact. The use of the Likert survey captures subjective perceptions, while the run chart provides objective, quantitative data. Continuous monitoring through these tools allows for timely adjustments and fosters a cycle of ongoing improvement. Moving forward, analysis of the data collected will guide subsequent PDSA cycles to refine strategies, sustain gains, and address residual barriers.

In conclusion, the "Do" stage of my self-improvement project has involved implementing targeted interventions with an evidence-based foundation, collecting pertinent data through surveys and observational charts, and integrating these efforts within the PDSA framework. This approach ensures a structured, data-driven process aimed at sustainable behavioral change and quality enhancement in infection prevention.

References

• Biswal, S., Kumar, A., & Sharma, S. (2019). Impact of visual cues on hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers. Journal of Infection Prevention, 20(5), 245-250.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021). Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings. https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/providers/index.html
• Erasmus, V., et al. (2010). Systematic review of studies on compliance with hand hygiene guidelines in hospital care. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 31(3), 283-294.
• Mahida, N., et al. (2018). Educational interventions to improve hand hygiene in healthcare workers: A systematic review. American Journal of Infection Control, 46(7), 767-773.
• World Health Organization (WHO). (2009). WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241597906