Quantitative Research Reporting Assignment

Quantitative Research Reporting Assignment

Throughout this course you have learned about the importance of research in counseling and how evidence-based research can inform how counselors practice.

This assignment will help you develop the skill of interpreting data and writing results based upon your research findings. Instructions Please navigate to the Benchmark Quantitative or Qualitative Research Reporting Assignment Case Scenario and Template and follow the steps to complete the assignment. Within this document, there are two case scenarios that detail a summary of the study, purpose, research question, hypothesis (for only the quantitative case), study design, data, method of analysis of the data, and the results. You will address the questions based upon which path you choose, and you will write one well-developed paragraph that has a logical flow using current APA format. Please see the Quantitative Reporting Example or the Qualitative Reporting Example for additional guidance. · This paragraph should be no more than 1/2 to 1 page. · For further study, section 3 of the APA manual discusses Journal Article Reporting Standards. · Please follow APA formatting for this assignment.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In this assignment, a quantitative research approach was employed to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention designed to address a specific behavioral issue among adolescents. The study was based on a randomized controlled trial design, where 40 adolescent participants with a dependence on smoking were randomly assigned to either a standard treatment group or a treatment group that incorporated mindfulness therapy. The primary research question aimed to determine whether the addition of mindfulness therapy would significantly improve treatment outcomes as measured by scores on the Nicotine Dependence Syndrome Scale (NDSS). The data analysis involved the use of an independent samples t-test, which is appropriate for comparing two independent groups to assess differences in their mean scores. The analysis revealed a statistically significant difference, t(38) = 4.9607, p = .000, with the group receiving combined therapy showing a lower mean score (M = 8.1, SD = 3.04) compared to the standard treatment group (M = 13.25, SD = 3.51). These results reject the null hypothesis that there would be no difference between the groups, indicating that the addition of mindfulness therapy enhances treatment efficacy for smoking dependence among adolescents. The implications for counseling practice suggest incorporating mindfulness techniques could improve intervention outcomes for adolescents struggling with nicotine addiction, especially when comorbid with depression. Such evidence supports the integration of mindfulness practices into existing treatment programs to optimize recovery and address underlying psychological factors. The results underscore the importance of rigorous quantitative evaluations in informing evidence-based approaches within counseling, aligning with APA journal reporting standards for clarity, transparency, and reliability of findings. This study exemplifies how quantitative research design and appropriate statistical testing contribute valuable insights to the development of more effective counseling interventions.

References

• Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.
• Fagerström, K. (2012). The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: A revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Addiction.
• Kirk, K. E., & Smith, L. M. (2020). Evidence-Based Counseling Techniques. Journal of Counseling & Development, 98(3), 265-273.
• American Psychological Association. (2023). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
• Moher, D., et al. (2009). PRISMA Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269.
• Nezu, A. M., Nezu, C. M., & D’Zurilla, T. J. (2013). Problem-Solving Therapy: A Positive Approach to Clinical Intervention. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Wolters Kluwer.
• Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
• West, R., et al. (2010). Trials of Nicotine Replacement Therapy. BMJ, 341, c5420.