Question 1: 20 Marks Unit 7 Questions When Analyzing The Tot

Question 1 20 Marks Unit 7 Questions When Analyzing The Total Varia

When analyzing the total variable overhead cost variance into both spending and efficiency variances, it is often assumed that direct labour hours is the sole cost driver. Required: 1) Explain if direct labour costs could ever be a better cost driver of variable overhead costs than direct labour hours. 2) How is the standard variable overhead rate different from the standard labour rate in variance analysis? Please explain.

Paper For Above instruction

In managerial accounting, understanding the drivers of variable overhead costs is essential for accurate variance analysis and effective cost control. Traditionally, direct labour hours (DLHs) are assumed to be the primary cost driver when analyzing variable overhead variances because many variable costs are closely linked to labour activity. However, in certain circumstances, direct labour costs themselves could serve as a better cost driver than direct labour hours, especially when variable overhead is more directly tied to labour wages rather than time spent on activities.

To explore whether direct labour costs could sometimes be a more appropriate cost driver than DLHs, we must consider the nature of the overhead costs. Variable overhead costs encompass expenses like supplies, utilities, and maintenance, which may correlate more directly with labour wages rather than hours worked. For instance, if the overhead costs are primarily driven by wage rates—say, the cost of skilled labor or contract workers—then using direct labour costs (which include wages and related expenses) as a cost driver can provide more precise variances. This is because fluctuations in wage rates directly impact overhead costs, whereas the total hours worked might not reflect these fluctuations accurately.

In such cases, the overhead incurred per dollar of direct labour cost would be a more relevant rate. This approach captures changes in labour wage rates, which might not be proportional to the hours worked. Therefore, when overhead costs are sensitive to wages—such as in industries with high-skilled labor where wages fluctuate due to market conditions—direct labour costs are a better cost driver than DLHs. Conversely, if overhead costs are more dependent on the volume of activities or machine hours, DLHs remain the more appropriate driver.

Regarding the second part of the question, the standard variable overhead rate differs from the standard labour rate in variance analysis in the following way:

• Standard Variable Overhead Rate: This rate is predetermined based on budgeted variable overhead costs divided by the estimated activity level, typically expressed as cost per unit of activity, such as per DLH or per machine hour. It is used to apply overhead to production and to analyze variances by comparing actual costs with expected costs based on actual activity levels.
• Standard Labour Rate: This rate is based on the expected wages per hour, derived from budgeted wages and hours. It is used in calculating labour efficiency and rate variances, reflecting differences between actual and standard wages or hours worked.

The key difference lies in their application and the nature of the costs they represent: the variable overhead rate pertains specifically to overhead costs assigned to products, while the labour rate relates to direct labour wages. In variance analysis, deviations from these standards help identify areas of cost control or inefficiency, with the overhead rate focusing on variable overhead control and the labour rate on wage cost management.

References

• Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., Rajan, M. (2015). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (15th ed.). Pearson.
• Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., Brewer, P. C. (2018). Managerial Accounting (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Blocher, E., Stout, D., Juras, P., Cokins, G. (2019). Cost Management: A Strategic Approach (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Kaplan, R. S., Anderson, S. R. (2004). Time-driven activity-based costing. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 131-138.
• Anthony, R. N., Govindarajan, V., Anthony, T. (2014). Management Control Systems (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Hilton, R. W., Platt, D. (2013). Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., Kieso, D. E. (2019). Financial & Managerial Accounting (11th ed.). Wiley.
• Ellis, T., McKinney, W. (2005). Modern Cost and Management Accounting. Pearson Education.
• Postle, S. (2012). Cost Accounting: An Introduction. Routledge.