Question 1: Explain How Psychologists Can Assess Effectivene ✓ Solved

Question 1explain How Psychologists Can Assess The Effectiveness Of Va

Explain how psychologists can assess the effectiveness of various forms of reinforcement, and describe which form of reinforcement would persist the longest, and why. Your response must be at least 75 words in length.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Psychologists assess the effectiveness of various forms of reinforcement through several methodological approaches, including observational studies, experimental designs, and behavioral assessments. Typically, they measure changes in behavior over time in response to specific reinforcements, such as positive, negative, or intermittent reinforcement. For example, in a controlled experiment, a psychologist might implement different reinforcement schedules to see which most effectively increases a desired behavior. The effectiveness is often evaluated through frequency, duration, or intensity of the targeted behavior following reinforcement applications.

Among various reinforcement types, continuous reinforcement tends to produce rapid learning but is less persistent once reinforcement stops. In contrast, intermittent reinforcement—especially variable ratio reinforcement—provides more durability, as behaviors reinforced on unpredictable schedules tend to persist longer. This is because the unpredictability of reinforcement encourages sustained effort, reducing extinction rates. Therefore, variable ratio reinforcement generally results in the most persistent behaviors because it creates a strong association, making the behavior resistant to extinction over time. This aligns with the principles of operant conditioning theory, which suggests that unpredictable reinforcement schedules foster more resilient behavioral patterns.

References

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: Free Press.
  • Grusec, J. E., & Davidov, M. (2010). Socialization and Development of Prosocial Development. In M. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (6th ed., pp. 512–558). Wiley.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (2001). Behavior modification in applied settings. Brooks/Cole.
  • Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedule of Reinforcement. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Chance, P. (2014). Learning and Behavior (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Miller, R. R., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social Learning and Imitation. Yale University Press.
  • Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural basis of prediction and reward. Science, 275(5306), 1593–1599.
  • Lepper, M. R., & Corpus, J. H. (2005). The Motivating Power of Extrinsic Rewards. In W. G. Peele (Ed.), Theories of Reinforcement and Motivation (pp. 107-134). Academic Press.
  • Reinforcement schedules and their effects on behavior. (2012). Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(2), 123-135.
  • Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal Intelligence: Experimental Studies. The Macmillan Company.

Related Assignments