Question 1 When Trying To Determine What Type Of Research St

Question 1when Trying To Determine What Type Of Research Study Is Desc

QUESTION 1 When trying to determine what type of research study is described in an article, which two sections of the article will give you the best information to make that determination? A. Abstract and conclusion B. Methods and limitations C. Methods and results D. Introduction and results E. Abstract and discussion F. Literature review and data analysis

Paper For Above instruction

Determining the type of research study described in a scholarly article involves a careful examination of specific sections within the publication. The most informative sections to analyze are typically the abstract and the methodology section. The abstract provides a concise summary of the study's purpose, design, and key findings, serving as a quick reference to identify if the study is qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods. The methodology section details the research design, data collection procedures, and analytical techniques, offering clear indicators of whether the study is experimental, correlational, descriptive, or exploratory.

According to research literature and best practices, the combination of information from the abstract and methods sections is most effective in accurately determining the type of study. The abstract often highlights whether the study involves experimental interventions, observational data, or thematic analysis, while the methods section elaborates on how data are gathered and analyzed, confirming its classification. Other sections such as the introduction or conclusion tend to be less specific regarding study design, and limitations or discussions often focus on implications rather than methodology.

Therefore, the best answer to the question is the combination of the abstract and methods sections, providing comprehensive insights to classify the research appropriately.

References

• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Wolters Kluwer.
• Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Sage Publications.
• Shields, L., et al. (2019). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration.
• Fink, A. (2019). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. Sage Publications.
• Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A Typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.
• King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256–270). Sage.
• Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. Wolters Kluwer.
• Grossoehme, D. H. (2014). Overview of Qualitative Research. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 7(3), 205–211.