Question 1: Which Of The Following Statements Is True Of Nar
Question 1which Of The Following Statements Is True Of Narrative Revie
Question 1which Of The Following Statements Is True Of Narrative Review
QUESTION 1 Which of the following statements is true of narrative reviews? (Select all that apply.)
A. Narrative reviews engage a highly structured and rigorous approach to reviewing research evidence.
B. Narrative reviews provide a general background discussion of a particular issue.
C. Narrative reviews require a rigorous, systematic approach to searching the databases for evidence.
D. Narrative reviews generally review literature that support the author's point of view on an issue or topic.
E. Narrative reviews are a type of primary research.
Paper For Above instruction
Narrative reviews are a common form of literature synthesis in research, primarily characterized by their descriptive and qualitative nature. Unlike systematic reviews, which follow a rigorous and methodical approach to literature search and analysis, narrative reviews tend to be more flexible in scope and methodology. They often serve to provide a broad overview of a topic or a background discussion that contextualizes key concepts, theories, or emerging trends in a field.
Given these characteristics, statements A, C, and E are generally false for narrative reviews. Statement A asserts that narrative reviews engage in a highly structured and rigorous approach, which aligns more with systematic reviews than narrative ones. Statement C implies a systematic method of database searching, which is not typical in narrative reviews. Statement E suggests that narrative reviews are primary research, which is incorrect; these are secondary sources synthesizing existing literature.
In contrast, statement B accurately describes a key role of narrative reviews—they provide a general background discussion on particular issues, making complex topics accessible and understandable. Statement D is also true; narrative reviews may feature literature that supports the author’s point of view, but they are not necessarily confined to selective evidence and often include diverse viewpoints to offer a comprehensive understanding.
Thus, the correct statements are B and D, highlighting the descriptive and interpretive nature of narrative reviews. They serve as valuable starting points for understanding issues but are not as systematic or replicable as other review types like systematic reviews with meta-analyses.
References
- Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage Publications.
- Greenhalgh, T. (2014). How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine. BMJ Publishing Group.
- Baethge, C., & Klinnert, T. (2015). Understanding narrative reviews: An introduction. Practical Oncology, 11(1), 31-35.
- Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
- Donald, R., & Lorraine, S. (2015). Methods of literature review and synthesis. Research Synthesis Methods, 6(1), 56-66.
- Nightingale, D. S. (2018). The nature and characteristics of narrative reviews in healthcare. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(21-22), e410-e417.
- Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Quantitative and qualitative methods in health technology assessment. Health Technology Assessment, 3(1).
- Pope, C., & Mays, N. (2016). Reaching beyond the literature: Reviewing research evidence. BMJ Publishing Group.
- Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. Sage Publications.
- Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. Sage Publications.