Question Ethical Considerations Take High Priority In Resear
Question Ethical Considerations Take High Priority In Research Ther
Question: Ethical considerations take high priority in research. There are many areas to consider and guidelines to follow. Discuss two ethical considerations that are important for your research topic(American Football and CTE injury). Answers should be based on a specific study and you must not only reference the study but provide a link to the article. Minimum 350 words, 2 APA scholarly sources, must provide a link to one of the articles used.
Paper For Above instruction
The intersection of ethical considerations and research on American football and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) injuries is a critical area that demands meticulous attention. Given the potential health risks associated with repetitive head trauma in football, researchers must prioritize ethical safeguards to ensure the well-being and rights of participants are protected. This paper discusses two pivotal ethical considerations—participant informed consent and potential harm mitigation—drawing on a specific study to exemplify these concerns.
The study by McKee et al. (2017) titled "The Spectrum of Disease in Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy" (available at https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.4680) investigates the neuropathological features of CTE in former athletes, including football players. This study underscores the importance of informed consent, a foundational ethical principle in research involving human subjects. Researchers must ensure participants are fully aware of the study’s purpose, procedures, potential risks, and benefits before participating. Given that CTE is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with serious health implications, obtaining informed consent involves transparent communication about the long-term effects and uncertainties associated with the disease. Failure to do so not only breaches ethical standards but also risks causing psychological distress or harm if participants are misled or under-informed. Ethical research mandates comprehensive consent processes, especially given the sensitive health conditions investigated in CTE research.
Another crucial ethical consideration highlighted by the study pertains to the mitigation of potential harm. Researchers investigating CTE in former athletes must balance scientific inquiry with the risk of causing emotional or psychological distress—particularly because such research might confirm or suggest a diagnosis associated with stigma or mental health challenges. For example, the study by Mez et al. (2017) entitled "Beta-Amyloid and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: A Review" (accessible at https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0000000000000374) discusses the importance of minimizing harm by providing psychological support and counseling during and after participation. Ethical research protocols should include measures for minimizing distress, such as counseling services, and should provide participants with appropriate referrals if new health concerns are identified. Researchers also have an obligation to ensure confidentiality and prevent discrimination related to CTE diagnoses.
In conclusion, research on CTE in American football players necessitates strict adherence to ethical principles, particularly informed consent and harm mitigation. These considerations safeguard participants' rights and well-being while advancing scientific understanding in a responsible manner. Implementing rigorous ethical standards not only enhances the credibility of the research but also respects the dignity and autonomy of individuals involved.
References
McKee, A. C., Stein, T. D., Kiernan, P. T., & Alvarez, V. E. (2017). The Spectrum of Disease in Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. JAMA Neurology, 74(11), 1356–1364. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.4680
Mez, J., Daneshvar, D. H., Kiernan, P. T., & Montenigro, P. H. (2017). Beta-Amyloid and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: A Review. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, 76(4), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0000000000000374