Question I - Paul Is The Sole Incorporator Of Hemp Co.

Question I - Paul is the sole incorporator of Hemp Co., a company that

Paul is the sole incorporator of Hemp Co., a company that processes hemp into clothing. Prior to the incorporation, Paul entered into a contract on behalf of Hemp Co. with a local farmer for the purchase of the crop. After the formation of the corporation, the board of directors did not ratify the contract because Paul bought the crop at three times the market price. The question is: Who is liable to the farmer?

Paper For Above instruction

The liability of the farmer hinges on whether Hemp Co. is bound by the pre-incorporation contract entered into by Paul. Under general corporation law, contracts entered into before the actual formation of the corporation are considered pre-incorporation contracts. The law provides that a corporation is not liable for contracts made prior to its formation unless it adopts or ratifies those contracts after incorporation. In this case, even though Paul was the sole incorporator and acted on behalf of the future company, the corporation did not ratify the contract after its formation.

Since the board did not ratify the contract due to Paul's decision to purchase the crop at an exorbitant price, the corporation generally would not be liable for the purchase of the crop. In the absence of ratification, the liability typically falls on the person who contracted on behalf of the corporation, which in this case was Paul. Therefore, the farmer can seek liability directly from Paul for the breach of contract.

However, Paul, acting as the incorporator and possibly as the initial agent, might be personally liable unless he explicitly disclaimed authority or the farmer knew Paul lacked authority at the time of the contract. Since the farmer contracted with Paul before the corporation's formal existence and the corporation did not adopt the contract afterward, the farmer cannot hold the corporation liable. Consequently, Paul remains personally liable to the farmer for the breach of the pre-incorporation contract.

This scenario underscores the importance of ratification and proper formation procedures in corporate law. Once the corporation is fully formed, it must adopt contracts made on its behalf before incorporation to assume liability. Failure to do so leaves the initial agent or individual who contracted liable for their actions.

Question II - Tina Technology is looking to raise $85,000 worth of capital, and she is looking to raise that money through the internet and still fall under an SEC exemption. How should Tina go about raising that money? Due to the amount of capital she is looking to raise, will Tina be subject to any other special requirements?

When Tina Technology seeks to raise $85,000 via the internet while maintaining compliance with securities regulations, her foremost concern is to utilize an appropriate securities exemption under the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules. One of the most suitable avenues for small capital raises is through Regulation Crowdfunding (Regulation CF), which allows startups and small companies to raise up to $5 million from a broad investor base via online platforms.

To comply with Regulation Crowdfunding, Tina must use a registered intermediary, such as a registered broker-dealer or a funding portal that is a registered crowdfunding platform. She must also prepare disclosure documents, including a detailed Form C, which contains financial statements, risk factors, and information about the company’s management. This process ensures transparency and provides investors with sufficient information to make informed investment decisions. Additionally, Tina must file the necessary reports with the SEC and provide ongoing disclosures as mandated.

Given the target amount of $85,000, Regulation Crowdfunding is an appropriate mechanism because it allows access to a wide investor base online while remaining compliant with SEC regulations. Notably, Regulation CF caps the amount investors can invest based on their income and net worth, but the company can raise the full $85,000 through this regime with the correct disclosures.

Beyond Regulation CF, Tina should consider other exemptions such as Regulation D (Rule 506(b) or 506(c)). Under Rule 506(b), she can raise an unlimited amount of capital from accredited investors and up to 35 non-accredited investors, provided there is no general solicitation. Under Rule 506(c), she can use general solicitation but must verify that all investors are accredited, and additional filings such as Form D are required.

Given the online nature of her fundraising, Regulation D might be less suitable unless she targets only accredited investors and complies with the verification process. Since she wants to raise a relatively modest amount, Regulation CF remains the most straightforward and cost-effective method to stay within an SEC exemption framework without extensive regulatory burdens.

Regarding additional requirements, Tina needs to ensure compliance with anti-fraud provisions, provide accurate and complete disclosures, and adhere to the investment limits applicable to each exemption. Furthermore, she should consider state securities laws, often called “blue sky laws,” which may impose additional registration or exemption requirements depending on her jurisdiction. Some states require notice filings and fees even if federal exemptions apply.

Overall, Tina Technology should consult securities law specialists to determine the optimal exemption and ensure all federal and state regulations are satisfied. Proper preparation and adherence to the rules will enable her to raise funds online efficiently while avoiding potential legal pitfalls.

References

  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (2021). Regulation Crowdfunding (Regulation CF). https://www.sec.gov/smallbusiness/exemptofferings/regulation-crowdfunding
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (2022). Crowdfunding: A Guide for Investors. https://www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-and-bacts/crowdfunding
  • Rimler, J. E. (2020). Securities regulation: Law and practice. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
  • Gopalan, V. (2017). Securities Regulation and Enforcement. West Academic Publishing.
  • Friedman, L. M. (2022). Securities Regulation and Practice. Foundation Press.
  • Blaszczyk, R., & Kripke, A. (2023). The evolution of crowdfunding regulations in the US. Journal of Securities Law, 40(2), 145–167.
  • Hamilton, R. (2019). Small Business Financing and the Impact of Securities Regulations. Business Law Today, 28(3), 4–11.
  • Gray, J. A. (2020). Online capital raising: Legal considerations under U.S. securities law. Harvard Business Law Review, 10, 111–130.
  • McCarthy, R. (2018). Crowd funding and securities law: Opportunities and risks. Columbia Law Review, 118(6), 2045–2097.
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (2019). Regulation D (Rules 506(b) and 506(c)). https://www.sec.gov/smallbusiness/exemptofferings/regulation-d

Related Assignments