Ra Vignette Analysis: Design Interventions Are Important

32 Ra Vignette Analysis Design Interventionsan Important Part Of T

Using the information found in the vignette, provide a preliminary diagnosis of the client according to The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM) criteria. Create a 2- to 3-page paper describing the assessment tools you will use. In your paper, include the following: A description of the steps you will take to build rapport with Laurel and help her feel comfortable in confiding in you. Consider the work of Carl Rogers Person Centered Theory; the work of Insoo Kim Berg Solution-Focused Brief Theory (SFBT); and Crisis Theory to help inform your rapport building with Laurel. A description of what methods you will use to continue with the assessment process, knowing this may take three to four visits. Be specific if you are considering using any instruments or questionnaires. Explain the rationale for using each method and indicate what information you expect to find by using them. Given the information you know at this point, what would be your provisional diagnosis of Laurel? Look at a diagnosis for this exercise. You may consider rule-outs. Any diagnosis you give should have an explanation of the criteria or symptoms supporting your choice. Study the vignette. Vignette—Laurel When Laurel was a freshman in college, she was one day walking back from her part-time job in town to the dorm where she lived. It was dusk when she reached the outskirts of a quiet neighborhood and started to cut across a large field that lay between town and campus. Suddenly, a man in a stocking mask jumped from a hedge that bordered the field. He grabbed her arm, pushed her down, and shoved the barrel of a gun into her mouth as he raped her. She thought she was going to die. But just as quickly as he had appeared, he disappeared. His only words were, “If you tell anybody about this, I’ll really get you.” Somehow, Laurel made it back to the dorm, and her roommate drove her immediately to a hospital emergency room. After she was examined and treated, she spoke briefly to a psychiatrist who suggested she talk to someone at the college counseling center. She was also questioned by police, who investigated the incident but were never able to develop a lead. The next day, Laurel felt strange, as if the experience had been a bad dream. She found herself jumping out of her skin at the slightest noise. Over the next few weeks, she had trouble falling asleep and woke from nightmares she could not clearly remember. But she did not go to the counseling center; she did not want to talk about the rape. It was as if talking about it might make it more real. She also felt vaguely guilty—she should not have taken the shortcut home. Over the next few weeks, Laurel’s life changed. Prior to the rape, she had started a relationship with a fellow student. Afterwards, she abruptly stopped seeing him or socializing much with anybody. She had difficulty concentrating on her schoolwork. Her grades, which had been consistently high before the rape, fell sharply. At the end of the semester, she dropped out of college where she had been doing preprofessional coursework. Only after working two years in a dead-end job did she finally decide to try again and enroll in a business course that trained her to do secretarial work. Five years later, following the breakup of a serious relationship, Laurel sought therapy for “depression.” She also complained of dissatisfaction with her job. She was beginning to see her problems with men as a result of her own ambivalence. Every time she got close to someone, she said, she began to panic and did something to force distance. Laurel considered her childhood normal and reasonably happy. Her parents seemed to have a good marriage, as did her siblings. She had concluded that something must be wrong with her. Use this template Module #: Assignment # Student Name: Date: [Use this template to complete your assignment.] Case Vignette: Assessment Answer the following questions thoroughly: 1. You are the therapist Laurel chose to work with, and you give Laurel an appointment to conduct an intake in order to start the assessment process. During that appointment, she relays the information mentioned in the vignette to you. a. Describe the steps you will take to make Laurel feel comfortable with telling her story to you. b. Describe what methods you will use to continue with the assessment process, knowing this may take three to four visits. Be specific if you are considering using any instruments or questionnaires. Explain the rationale for using each method, and indicate what information you expect to find by using them. c. Given the information you know at this point, what would be your provisional diagnosis of Laurel? i. Use DSM criteria (including appropriate diagnosis code number). ii. You may consider rule-outs. Any diagnosis you give should have an explanation of the criteria/symptoms supporting your choice.

Paper For Above instruction

In conducting an effective assessment for Laurel, a trauma survivor presenting with symptoms indicative of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression, it is crucial to establish a foundation of trust and safety during the initial interaction. Using principles from Carl Rogers' Person-Centered Therapy, Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT), and Crisis Theory can guide the rapport-building process, ensuring Laurel feels understood, respected, and empowered to share her story. The assessment process itself will require a combination of clinical interviews, structured questionnaires, and trauma-specific assessment tools to comprehensively understand her psychological state and formulate an accurate diagnosis.

Building Rapport with Laurel

Establishing trust is the first step in effectively engaging Laurel in therapy. Drawing upon Carl Rogers' Person-Centered Theory emphasizes creating a non-judgmental, empathetic environment where her experiences are validated. Active listening, unconditional positive regard, and congruence would be essential, ensuring Laurel feels safe to disclose sensitive information. In addition, solution-focused techniques, such as highlighting her strengths, previous coping successes, and future-oriented goal setting, can foster hope and motivation. Crisis Theory underscores the importance of immediate reassurance, emphasizing safety and stabilization before delving into her trauma narrative. Showing understanding and maintaining a calm, consistent demeanor will help her feel secure enough to begin opening up gradually.

Assessment Methods and Instruments

Given the complex nature of Laurel’s trauma history, a multi-modal assessment approach will be essential. Initially, a semi-structured clinical interview, such as the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5), would provide detailed information about her trauma symptoms, functional impairments, and duration. The CAPS-5 is evidence-based and allows for a nuanced understanding of PTSD symptom severity, which is crucial for diagnosis and treatment planning (Weathers et al., 2018). Complementing this, the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) can be used to quantify her depression severity, capturing symptoms such as anhedonia, hopelessness, and fatigue (Beck et al., 1996). These outcome measures help establish baselines and monitor progress over subsequent sessions.

Additional instruments such as the Trauma History Questionnaire (THQ) may be utilized to gather detailed information about her traumatic experiences, including the assault and subsequent life changes. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) can also be administered to assess the presence and severity of depressive symptoms more broadly. For a comprehensive cognitive assessment, tools like the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) could be considered if cognitive deficits are suspected, which can sometimes occur with trauma and depression (Nasreddine et al., 2005). Each instrument's rationale is rooted in its validity, reliability, and clinical utility in trauma and mood disorder assessments.

Provisional Diagnosis

Based on the vignette information, a provisional diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) appears warranted, supported by her intrusive nightmares, hyperarousal, avoidance behaviors, and significant functional impairment following the assault (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The trauma-related symptoms, such as jumpiness, nightmares, and avoidance of situations reminiscent of the assault, satisfy DSM-5 criteria for PTSD (Criterion A: exposure to a traumatic event; Criterion B: intrusive symptoms; Criterion C: avoidance; Criterion D: negative alterations in mood and cognition; Criterion E: arousal and reactivity). The timing of her symptoms emerging immediately after the assault and their persistence over weeks aligns with this diagnosis.

Furthermore, her history of depression following significant life stressors, including her breakup and residual trauma, suggests comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD). Symptoms like anhedonia, feelings of guilt, and low motivation support this, with DSM-5 criteria including depressed mood most of the day, diminished interest, and fatigue (Criterion A). Given her symptoms and history, a rule-out of Adjustment Disorder with depressed mood might be considered if her symptoms were directly tied solely to recent stressors, but her longstanding trauma symptoms favor an MDD diagnosis co-occurring with PTSD.

In conclusion, the initial assessment should focus on confirming the severity of PTSD symptoms, evaluating comorbid depression, and understanding her broader psychosocial functioning. Such comprehensive evaluation, guided by validated tools and therapeutic rapport, will inform tailored intervention strategies grounded in evidence-based practices.

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
• Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
• Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., et al. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): A brief screening tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695-699.
• Weathers, F. W., Blake, D. D., Schnurr, P. P., et al. (2018). The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5).
• Green, B. L., & Korchin, S. J. (Eds.). (1989). Trauma and Its Wake: The Study and Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. American Psychiatric Press.
• Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and Recovery. Basic Books.
• Theodore, D. M., et al. (2020). Trauma assessment tools: An overview. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 33(3), 389-399.
• Insoo Kim Berg & Steve de Shazer. (2012). Solution-Focused Brief Therapy: Foundations, Research, and New Directions. Routledge.
• Rose, S., et al. (2015). Crisis intervention and trauma-informed care in clinical practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 39, 62-73.
• Cosgrove, L., et al. (2014). Building rapport in trauma counseling: Techniques and outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(3), 351-359.