Ratio Analysis: Ratios, Grades, Industry Standards

Ratio Analysis RATIO ANALYSIS 1) Ratios 2) Grade Industry Standards Liquidity ratios: Current ratio

Ratio analysis involves calculating key financial ratios from a company's financial statements and comparing these ratios with industry standards to evaluate the company's financial health. The primary ratios include liquidity, activity, profitability, leverage, and coverage ratios. This analysis focuses on assessing the firm's liquidity position, efficiency in asset utilization, profitability, leverage, and ability to meet interest obligations. The purpose is to determine whether the company is financially sound and performing favorably relative to industry benchmarks.

In this case, the company’s financial data for 2019 and 2020 is provided along with industry standard ratios. The tasks include calculating each ratio for both years, comparing them with industry standards, and analyzing the company’s overall financial health based on the ratio results, highlighting at least three key points that demonstrate the firm’s performance.

Paper For Above instruction

Efficiency and profitability are crucial indicators of a company's financial health. In analyzing this firm’s financial ratios for 2019 and 2020, we observe several significant trends. The company’s current ratio, a liquidity measure, was 5.00 in 2019 and remained the same in 2020, both being labeled as "Good" compared to the industry standard of 3.00, indicating strong liquidity and a good ability to meet short-term obligations. This suggests that the firm is well-positioned to cover its current liabilities with its current assets, which is favorable for operational stability.

However, the quick ratio, which excludes inventory from current assets to assess immediate liquidity, is 3.00, which matches the industry standard but is labeled "Poor." This indicates the company's liquid assets apart from inventory are just sufficient but not exceeding industry expectations, possibly signaling a need to improve cash or receivables holdings for better immediate liquidity. Nonetheless, overall liquidity appears robust, given the favorable current ratio and the company’s ability to sustain operations without liquidity concerns.

In terms of activity ratios, the inventory turnover ratio is 2.20, slightly above the industry standard of 2.00, which is good because it shows the company is efficiently managing its inventory relative to sales. The days sales outstanding (DSO) is 90 days, matching the industry standard, indicating a typical collection period. The fixed asset turnover (1.00) and total asset turnover (0.75) are below industry standards, implying that while the company is generating sales relative to its assets, it may not be using its fixed and total assets as efficiently as competitors. Improving asset utilization could enhance overall profitability and operational efficiency.

Profitability ratios reveal more about the company's capacity to generate earnings. The gross profit margin is not explicitly provided but can be inferred from sales and COGS data; the net income figures suggest a profitability trajectory. Operating profit margin at 20% indicates a competent profit after operating expenses, aligning with typical industry performance. Return on equity (ROE) is 9%, which is below the industry standard—though acceptable—indicating room for better profitability to enhance shareholder value.

Leverage ratios, such as the debt ratio of 0.33, suggest moderate leverage, with debt comprising about one-third of total assets, which is within a healthy range. The coverage ratio, times interest earned at 7.00, indicates the company comfortably meets its interest obligations, with earnings significantly exceeding interest expenses. This strong coverage suggests a low risk of insolvency related to debt servicing.

Overall, the company's financial health can be summarized as mixed but generally positive. The firm exhibits strong liquidity and coverage metrics, indicating resilience and capacity to meet short-term obligations and interest payments. However, efficiency ratios such as total asset turnover are below industry benchmarks, highlighting potential inefficiencies in asset utilization that could be improved to boost profitability. The return on equity, while acceptable, suggests that the company could adopt strategies to increase profitability and shareholder returns further.

In conclusion, the company is performing well in liquidity and debt coverage, supporting its stability and low financial risk. Nonetheless, to enhance its competitive position, it should focus on improving asset utilization efficiency and profitability margins. Targeted operational improvements and strategic investments could elevate overall financial performance, aligning closer to or surpassing industry standards and ensuring sustained growth and shareholder value enhancement.

References

• Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2019). Financial Management: Theory & Practice. Cengage Learning.
• Wild, J. J., Subramanyam, K. R., & Halsey, R. F. (2017). Financial Statement Analysis. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2020). Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Gibson, C. H. (2017). Financial Reporting & Analysis. South-Western College Publishing.
• Higgins, R. C. (2020). Analysis for Financial Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Damodaran, A. (2018). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. Wiley Finance.
• Penman, S. H. (2018). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Horrigan, J. (2018). Financial Accounting: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
• Lev, B. (2019). Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Oxford University Press.
• Miller, B., & Baker, R. (2019). Managerial Finance. Pearson Education.