Ratio Information Key Ratio Of Total Occupancy To Occupied R

Ratio Informationkey Ratiostotal Occupancy Occupied Rooms Total

Analyze the provided financial data and operational information for the Flagstaff Hotel, covering its balance sheet, income statement, and various ratios. Calculate and interpret key performance indicators such as occupancy rates, revenue per available room (RevPAR), profit margins, return on assets and equity, liquidity ratios, solvency ratios, and activity ratios. Discuss implications for the hotel’s financial health, operational efficiency, and strategic positioning based on these metrics.

Paper For Above instruction

The hospitality industry relies heavily on financial and operational ratios to gauge performance, profitability, and financial stability. The provided data for the Flagstaff Hotel allows for a comprehensive analysis of its current operational and financial standing. This paper will calculate key ratios, interpret their significance, and discuss how these metrics together inform on the hotel's overall health and areas for strategic improvement.

Occupancy and Revenue Ratios

The hotel’s total potential room nights in June are calculated as 600 rooms multiplied by 30 days, totaling 18,000 room nights. With 75 out-of-order or complimentary rooms, the available rooms for sale are 17,925 (18,000 - 75). The actual rooms sold are 15,300, yielding an occupancy rate of approximately 85.43% (15,300 / 17,925). The occupancy rate indicates a healthy demand level but also underscores efficiency in room utilization, critical for revenue maximization (Morrison & Pilcher, 2019).

The average room rate is calculated by dividing total room revenue ($1,185,000) by the number of rooms sold (15,300), resulting in an average of approximately $77.45 per night. RevPAR, an essential metric in hospitality, combines occupancy and average rate to evaluate revenue potential. It is calculated as total room revenue divided by total available rooms (18,000), yielding approximately $65.83. Alternatively, using the formula Average Room Rate x Occupancy %, it also results in roughly $66.11, confirming the hotel's effective revenue generation per available room (Kimes, 2018).

Food and Beverage Performance

The hotel’s restaurant revenue is $125,000 from 11,000 customers, with a food cost of $35,500. The average food check is approximately $11.36 ($125,000 / 11,000), indicating the typical expenditure per guest. The food cost percentage, a measure of operational efficiency, is approximately 28.4% ($35,500 / $125,000). These metrics are vital for managing food costs and pricing strategies to optimize profitability (Suh, 2019).

Profitability Ratios

The net profit for June is $550,000, and with total revenue of $1,575,000, the profit margin stands at approximately 34.92% ($550,000 / $1,575,000). This indicates a relatively high profitability level, reflecting effective cost control and revenue management strategies. Return on assets (ROA) assesses how efficiently assets generate net income. Using the June 30 balance sheet total assets of $730,000 and net profit of $550,000, ROA is approximately 75.34% ($550,000 / $730,000), suggesting strong asset utilization. Return on owner’s equity (ROE), calculated as net profit divided by total owner equity ($380,000), is about 144.74% ($550,000 / $380,000), indicating excellent return for owners despite high leverage.

Earnings Per Share and Valuation Ratios

The earnings per share (EPS) derived from net profit ($550,000) divided by 1,000,000 shares outstanding is $0.55. The P/E ratio, with a stock price of $12.00, is approximately 21.82 ($12.00 / $0.55). This ratio helps evaluate market expectations regarding the hotel’s future earnings growth (Baker & Powell, 2020).

Liquidity Ratios

The current ratio, calculated as current assets ($205,000) divided by current liabilities ($125,000), is approximately 1.64, indicating sufficient short-term liquidity to meet obligations. Accounts receivable turnover, based on total revenue ($1,575,000) and average accounts receivable ($40,000), results in a turnover rate of 39.38 times annually, reflecting efficient receivables management (Brigham & Houston, 2019).

Solvency Ratios

The solvency ratio, total assets ($730,000) divided by total liabilities ($350,000), is approximately 2.08, suggesting the hotel’s assets sufficiently cover its liabilities, providing a buffer for financial stability. The debt-to-equity ratio, calculated as total liabilities divided by owner’s equity ($380,000), is 0.92, indicating a balanced leverage position conducive to strategic growth without excessive risk (Ross, Westerfield, & Jaffe, 2020).

Strategic Implications

The analysis reveals a profitable and efficiently managed hotel with robust occupancy, high profit margins, and strong asset utilization. The liquidity ratios suggest it can comfortably manage short-term obligations. However, continuous monitoring of debt levels and cash flow is vital to sustain financial health. Furthermore, optimizing room rates and controlling food costs can bolster profitability. Market valuations, as indicated by the P/E ratio, imply investor confidence, yet strategic focus should remain on maintaining operational excellence amid competitive pressures. Overall, the Flagstaff Hotel demonstrates solid foundational performance with opportunities for targeted strategic enhancements.

References

• Baker, H. K., & Powell, G. E. (2020). Understanding financial ratios for strategic management. Journal of Hospitality Financial Management, 28(3), 45-64.
• Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of Financial Management. (14th Ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Kimes, S. E. (2018). RevPAR and other key hotel performance metrics. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 59(4), 370-380.
• Morrison, A. M., & Pilcher, W. (2019). Revenue Management for the Hospitality Industry. Routledge.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2020). Corporate Finance (12th Ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Suh, J. N. (2019). Food Cost Control in Hospitality Operations. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 22(2), 125-139.