Read All Of The Following Nine Questions In Part

Instructionsread All Of The Following Nine Questions In Parts A B An

Read all of the following nine questions in Parts A, B, and C before beginning this project. Use the questions to reflect on the activities you completed in Modules 1 to 4. Write a paper addressing the following questions and reflections. The paper should be no more than 20 pages double-spaced (approximately 5,000 words) and should include examples from your journalling activities.

Part A: Stakeholders and Interrelationships

Describe how the activities influenced your awareness and understanding of the interrelationship between business and society. Use examples from your activities in each of the modules to support this answer.

Using examples from your activities, describe the challenges of dealing with the conflicts and/or confluence of stakeholder needs, wants, expectations, and perspectives. Identify whose perspective you are representing in each of your examples. List examples of some of the ramifications of ignoring or improperly addressing stakeholder interests.

Comment on how the use of “circles of reflection” can affect your perspective of an issue or situation. Cite examples from your activities to demonstrate how use of the circles of reflection affected your analysis.

Part B: Forces and Influences

Comment on how ethics and social responsibility relate to some of the internal and external forces in business and society that we discussed in this course. Review activities in Modules 3 and 4, as well as Module 2, for examples.

Describe how the readings and journalling activities influenced your views on workplace ethics and corporate social responsibility. Did you have a shift in your perspective? Do you consider ethics and/or corporate social responsibility to be important to business and society today? Explain your answer, and use examples from the activities.

Comment on the interrelationship between external forces such as globalization, economics, technology, and the environment, and internal influences on business and society including governance and corporate citizenship (CSR), consumer protection, employee rights and responsibilities, and workplace diversity. Remember to support your argument with multiple examples such as sample journal entries, and readings.

Is the government an external force, an internal force, a stakeholder, or all of the above? Using examples from your activities, comment on the government’s role in business and society.

Part C: Final Reflection

Comment on how journalling activities helped you recognize the real or potential impact of stakeholder biases as well as your own biases. How do biases or differing perspectives influence the media, public opinion, and decision-making in business and society? Use examples from your activities to support your commentary.

Describe what was the most significant learning for you in this course and explain why.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The intricate relationship between business and society is dynamic, complex, and multifaceted. Throughout the modules, I engaged in activities that deepened my understanding of this interrelationship, particularly in terms of stakeholder influence, ethical considerations, and external and internal forces shaping societal and business norms. This paper reflects on those activities, illustrating how they influenced my perceptions and understanding of the broader societal impacts of business operations.

Part A: Stakeholders and Interrelationships

My activities in Modules 1 and 2 highlighted the profound influence stakeholders have on business decision-making. For example, during a simulated stakeholder analysis activity, I recognized how consumer advocacy groups, local communities, and investors shape corporate strategies. This understanding was reinforced when I examined a case where neglecting stakeholder interests led to brand damage and financial loss (Freeman, 1984). Addressing stakeholder conflicts requires balancing competing needs, such as a company prioritizing environmental sustainability versus cost reduction. My perspective as a future business leader emphasized the importance of transparent communication and ethical responsibility, which can mitigate adverse effects of stakeholder misalignments (Mitchell, Agle, & Wood, 1997).

The use of circles of reflection proved crucial in broadening my perspective. For example, when analyzing a contentious community development project, I employed reflection circles to consider multiple stakeholder viewpoints—local residents, city officials, and environmentalists. This approach broadened my understanding, highlighting the importance of empathy and holistic analysis in ethical decision-making (Kolb, 1984).

Part B: Forces and Influences

Ethics and social responsibility are intertwined with external forces such as globalization and environmental sustainability. My readings, such as Carroll's (1999) Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility, expanded my view, emphasizing that businesses must operate ethically within societal expectations. Journalling these insights, I began to see CSR as integral to long-term success, not just philanthropy. For example, during a case study on multinational corporations, I observed that those committed to ethical practices gained competitive advantages by building consumer trust and loyalty (Carroll, 1999).

External forces like globalization accelerate economic integration but also pose challenges for ethics and responsibility. For instance, increased supply chain complexity raises concerns over labor rights and environmental standards. Internally, governance structures and company policies must adapt to uphold ethical standards (Crane, Matten, & Moon, 2008). The role of government emerges as both a regulator and stakeholder—regulating practices while also influencing societal norms through legislation (Donaldson & Preston, 1995). My activities showed that governments can drive corporate responsibility via policies, such as environmental regulations or labor laws, exemplified by the implementation of the Paris Agreement (UNFCC, 2015).

Part C: Final Reflection

Journalling fostered awareness of personal and stakeholder biases. For instance, I realized that my perceptions of business ethics were initially shaped by cultural norms emphasizing profit over social concerns. Recognizing biases enabled me to critically evaluate media representations of corporate misconduct, which often sensationalize issues without contextual nuance (Cerulo & Bonilla, 2014). Differing perspectives, stained by biases, influence public opinion and decision-making, often leading to polarized debates (Krosnick & Kinder, 1990). Understanding these biases helps in developing more balanced, informed viewpoints.

The most significant learning was the realization that ethical business practices are central to sustainable societal development. This insight has influenced my perspective, emphasizing that corporate responsibility should extend beyond profit to encompass environmental stewardship, social equity, and transparent governance. Moving forward, I intend to incorporate these principles into my professional activities, championing responsible entrepreneurship (Maon, Lindgreen, & Swaen, 2010).

In conclusion, the activities and reflections throughout this course have profoundly shaped my understanding of the interplay between business and society. Recognizing the importance of stakeholder engagement, ethics, and external influences has prepared me to approach future challenges with a holistic, responsible mindset.

References

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.
  • Cerulo, D., & Bonilla, S. (2014). Media Influence and Perception of Corporate Ethical Standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(2), 321–331.
  • Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Corporations and Citizenship. In A. Crane, D. Matten, & D. Moon (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in a Global Context (pp. 13–46). Routledge.
  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
  • Krosnick, J. A., & Kinder, D. R. (1990). Psychomatic and Political Biases in Public Opinion. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 601–617.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall.
  • Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Organizational Changes Needed to Implement Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of the Consumer Goods Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 297–310.
  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC). (2015). The Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement

Related Assignments