Read Case Study 9, Pages 287-291

Read Case Study 9 1 Pages 287 291httpsplatformvirdocscomrs0do

Read case study 9-1 pages Write a minimum 2 page paper answering the questions below, APA format, with intext citation and references 1. Do you consider the description of the Bridgestone/Firestone store manager's responsibilities important information that the raters or managers need to be knowledgeable about? 2. Does the portion of the performance evaluation form used by Bridgestone/Firestone require any subjective judgments or considerations on the part of the rater? 3. Suppose that a Bridgestone/Firestone manager received an outstanding performance. Does that mean he or she is promotable? Why?

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Performance evaluations are a critical component of human resource management, serving to assess employee contributions, identify development needs, and inform promotion decisions. The case study of Bridgestone/Firestone's performance appraisal system offers valuable insights into the importance of detailed responsibilities, the role of subjective judgments, and the implications of outstanding ratings. This paper examines whether the description of store managers' responsibilities is vital information for raters, analyzes the subjective elements within the performance evaluation form, and discusses whether exceptional performance necessarily equates to promotability within the company's context.

Importance of Store Manager Responsibilities in Performance Evaluation

The detailed description of store manager responsibilities is essential for accurate and fair performance appraisal. According to the case study, clearly articulated responsibilities provide a benchmark against which employee performance can be measured (Bridgestone/Firestone, 1990). Such clarity ensures that raters evaluate managers based on consistent standards relevant to their job functions, thereby reducing ambiguity and potential bias. Furthermore, understanding specific responsibilities helps managers and raters align performance assessments with organizational goals, such as customer satisfaction, sales growth, and operational efficiency. For instance, if a manager's role includes managing inventory effectively, evaluating performance on that criterion becomes more objective and meaningful. Therefore, comprehensive knowledge of responsibilities enables raters to make informed judgments, ensuring appraisals are accurate, equitable, and aligned with organizational expectations.

Subjectivity in the Performance Evaluation Form

The Bridgestone/Firestone performance evaluation form incorporates both objective and subjective elements, reflecting the complex nature of managerial responsibilities. The case indicates that while some performance dimensions, such as sales figures or inventory levels, are quantifiable, others, like leadership qualities or customer service attitude, require subjective judgment (Bridgestone/Firestone, 1990). These subjective assessments involve considerations such as interpersonal skills, initiative, and adaptability, which are inherently more difficult to measure precisely. The importance of subjective judgment in evaluations underscores the need for raters to be well-trained to minimize biases and ensure consistency. Additionally, subjective components are crucial for capturing aspects of performance that cannot be easily quantified, such as managerial effectiveness or team morale. Nonetheless, reliance on subjective judgment necessitates clear criteria and standards to maintain fairness. Overall, the evaluation form's blend of objective and subjective criteria reflects the multifaceted nature of managerial performance but also introduces challenges related to potential bias and inconsistency.

Promotability of Outstanding Performers

Achieving an outstanding performance rating does not automatically guarantee promotability within Bridgestone/Firestone. While exceptional performance demonstrates a manager's competence and contribution, other factors influence promotability, such as readiness for increased responsibilities, leadership potential, and organizational needs (Bridgestone/Firestone, 1990). For example, a manager may excel in current duties but lack the skills or desire to assume higher roles. Conversely, a manager with a strong potential for leadership may be promoted even without the highest performance rating if they show promise for growth and development. The case study emphasizes that promotions should consider both performance results and potential to succeed in more advanced positions. Therefore, outstanding performance is a necessary but not sufficient condition for promotion; it must be complemented by factors like leadership ability, strategic thinking, and alignment with organizational objectives.

Conclusion

The description of store manager responsibilities plays a vital role in the performance evaluation process by providing clear standards and focused criteria for assessment. The evaluation form used by Bridgestone/Firestone incorporates subjective judgments, which are indispensable for capturing qualitative aspects of performance but require careful management to ensure fairness. Finally, outstanding performance, while indicative of a promising employee, does not automatically guarantee promotion, as broader considerations about potential and organizational fit are essential. Effective performance appraisal systems balance objective metrics with subjective insights and consider both performance and potential to foster organizational growth and employee development.

References

Bridgestone/Firestone. (1990). Case study 9-1. In Organizational Behavior and Management (pp. 287–291).

Cascio, W. F. (2018). Managing human resources (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Organization development and change (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

DeNisi, A., & Williams, K. J. (2018). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Routledge.

Latham, G. P. (2012). Humans will find a way: Performance management and developmental coaching. Routledge.

Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Sage Publications.

Pynes, J. E. (2013). Human resources management for public and nonprofit organizations. Jossey-Bass.

Schneider, B., & Barbera, K. M. (2014). The social psychology of organizations. Sage Publications.

Schermerhorn, J. R. (2018). Organization behavior. Wiley.

Werner, J. M., & DeSimone, R. L. (2012). Human resource development. Cengage Learning.