Read F. Sionil Jose's Short Story The God Stealer

Read F Sionil Joses Short Story The God Stealer Published In 1959

Read F. Sionil Jose’s short story "The God Stealer" published in 1959, and consider these questions while reading: 1. From whose perspective is this story narrated? 2. What does the story reveal about the relationship between Sam and Philip? Now write about how you think concepts and concerns of cultural appropriation and Orientalism might apply to this short story. Moreover, what other elements of the story do you find interesting, and why?

Paper For Above instruction

F. Sionil Jose’s short story "The God Stealer," published in 1959, offers a compelling narrative intertwined with themes of cultural identity, imperialism, and colonial oppression. Analyzing this story within the frameworks of cultural appropriation and Orientalism provides deeper insight into its critique of colonial attitudes and their lasting impacts on Filipino identity and culture. This essay explores these themes, the narrative perspective, and other notable elements of the story.

Firstly, understanding the narrative perspective is crucial to interpreting the story’s underlying messages. "The God Stealer" is narrated from a third-person limited point of view, primarily focusing on the character of Sam, a Filipino who has been exposed to Western influences and colonial education. This perspective offers an intimate look at Sam’s internal struggles with his cultural identity, as well as his feelings of shame, confusion, and resistance. The narrative perspective allows readers to empathize with Sam’s conflicted emotions, highlighting the personal impact of colonialism on individual consciousness.

Regarding the relationship between Sam and Philip, the story portrays a complex dynamic rooted in colonial hierarchies and cultural imposition. Philip, a Western missionary or colonial figure, embodies the dominant culture that seeks to impose its values and religion on the Filipino community. Sam, on the other hand, represents the colonized subject grappling with his identity while being subjected to Philip’s authority and cultural dominance. This relationship exemplifies the power imbalance often present in colonial settings, where the colonizer exerts influence over the colonized not only through political or economic means but also through cultural and religious indoctrination.

Applying the concepts of cultural appropriation and Orientalism to "The God Stealer" reveals how Western colonial powers appropriated and misunderstood Filipino culture, often reducing it to stereotypes or misconceptions. Edward Said’s theory of Orientalism describes how Western narratives have historically constructed the East—often including the Philippines—as exotic, primitive, or in need of Western salvation. In the context of Jose’s story, colonial figures like Philip embody this Orientalist view—seeing Filipino customs and beliefs as inferior or as something to be ‘corrected’ or replaced. The story subtly critiques this attitude by illustrating how the colonizer’s attempts to 'save' or dominate Filipino culture result in cultural loss and identity confusion.

The theme of cultural theft is vividly captured in the idea of the "God Stealer" itself—possibly a metaphor for how Western Christianity and colonial authority have historically removed indigenous spiritual practices or beliefs, replacing them with foreign religious doctrines. The story highlights the destructive impact of this cultural appropriation, emphasizing how colonial powers take elements of Filipino identity under the guise of civilizing or saving, yet ultimately diminish the richness and authenticity of local traditions.

Moreover, the story’s interesting elements extend beyond its thematic concerns. The vivid descriptions of Filipino settings and customs serve as a reminder of the vibrant cultural backdrop that colonial narratives often marginalized. Jose’s narrative style integrates Filipino linguistic and cultural nuances, subtly resisting Western hegemony and emphasizing the importance of indigenous perspectives. An interesting element is how the story portrays the internal conflict within Filipino characters like Sam, who are torn between embracing modernization inspired by Western influence and preserving their cultural heritage. This internal conflict mirrors the wider societal tensions in post-colonial nations grappling with identity and sovereignty.

Another compelling element is the symbolic use of religious imagery and rituals, which underline the colonizers' attempts to validate their authority through spiritual means. The story depicts how religion, often a tool of imperial control, can also become a site of resistance and cultural assertion by the Filipino characters. This duality underscores the complex relationship between colonizers and the colonized—where elements meant to suppress might also become mechanisms for cultural revival.

In conclusion, "The God Stealer" poignantly explores the intricacies of colonialism, cultural appropriation, and identity through its narrative perspective, character relationships, and symbolic imagery. Applying theoretical frameworks like Orientalism helps reveal how colonial powers constructed perceptions of the East to justify their dominance, often at the expense of indigenous culture. Jose’s storytelling underscores the resilience of Filipino cultural identity and the ongoing struggle against cultural imperialism. Recognizing these elements enriches our understanding of post-colonial literature and its role in advocating for cultural sovereignty and historical truth.

References

• Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Vintage Books.
• Jose, F. Sionil. (1959). The God Stealer. Solidaridad Publishing.
• Ramaswami, S. (1993). Filipino Identity and Literature. Ateneo de Manila University Press.
• Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity At Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press.
• Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Eds. C. Nelson & L. Grossberg. University of Illinois Press.
• Reed-Danahay, D. (1997). Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social. Bergin & Garvey.
• Ritzer, G. (2010). Globalization and Culture: Global Melluings and Cultural Flows. Sage Publications.
• Wilson, R. (1995). Decolonizing the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. James Currey.
• Young, R. J. C. (2001). Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Blackwell Publishing.
• Baker, C. (2014). The Globalization of Cultural Identity: Postcolonial Perspectives. Routledge.