Read The Case And Reading Material I Uploaded, Answer The Qu ✓ Solved
Read The Case And Reading Material I Uploaded Answer The Quesiton M
Read the case and reading material I uploaded. answer the question. Make sure you incorporate reading material into the paper. I have a case analysis example. Use it as a reference do not just copy it. Answer the question: What should Thomas Green do? Please consider the following questions: (While you do not need to directly answer the questions below in your response, they might be helpful to consider as you prepare your written case analysis) What sources of power are most accessible to Thomas Green? To Frank Davis? How should Thomas Green respond to the power held by Frank Davis? What influence tactic(s) should Thomas Green employ? Support your response with appropriate application of the principles presented in the reading material.
Sample Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
The case involving Thomas Green presents a complex dynamic of power and influence within an organizational setting. To prescribe a strategic course of action for Green, it is essential to analyze the sources of power available to him and Frank Davis, evaluate the power balance, and determine effective influence tactics based on organizational behavior principles. This essay assesses these factors using the provided reading materials and theoretical frameworks, ultimately recommending actions that enable Green to navigate the situation effectively while maintaining professional integrity.
Sources of Power for Thomas Green and Frank Davis
Thomas Green and Frank Davis possess different sources of power within the workplace, which influence their interactions and decision-making capabilities. Green's accessible sources of power include expertise and referent power. As a professional with specific skills and knowledge, Green can leverage his expertise to shape perceptions and influence decisions. Additionally, if Green has built a strong rapport and reputation, he may hold referent power, deriving influence from admiration and personal connections within the organization (French & Raven, 1959).
In contrast, Frank Davis's power appears to stem primarily from legitimate and coercive sources. Davis's position of authority grants him legitimate power, giving him the formal capacity to make decisions affecting Green. If Davis employs coercive tactics or has control over resources, he wields coercive power, which can be used to enforce compliance or influence Green's actions. Recognizing these sources is crucial for Green to assess his options and limitations.
Responding to Frank Davis's Power
Thomas Green must respond strategically to Davis's dominant power, especially if Davis’s influence threatens Green’s objectives or ethical standards. One effective approach involves understanding and respecting Davis’s legitimate power while employing influence tactics that are assertive yet aligned with organizational norms. Green should avoid direct confrontation that could damage relationships and instead opt for a collaborative approach.
This entails engaging Davis through open communication, demonstrating shared goals, and providing evidence-based arguments to persuade him. Such tactics are consistent with the principles of soft influence strategies, which emphasize building consensus and reducing resistance (Yukl, 2013). Additionally, Green could utilize rational persuasion, leveraging facts and logical reasoning to influence Davis's perceptions and decisions.
Influence Tactics Recommended for Thomas Green
Based on the reading material and organizational behavior theories, Green should employ influence tactics such as rational persuasion and consultation. Rational persuasion involves appealing to Davis’s sense of reason by presenting well-founded evidence and logical arguments, fostering a cooperative environment (French & Raven, 1959). Consultation involves seeking Davis’s input and participation, which enhances commitment and diminishes resistance.
Furthermore, Green could develop his referent power by strengthening relationships and demonstrating competence, making him a trusted advisor. Utilizing ingratiation—flattering or showing genuine appreciation—could also momentarily enhance influence, provided it is sincere and contextually appropriate (Yukl, 2013). Employing these tactics carefully, without appearing manipulative, can increase Green’s influence and facilitate a favorable outcome.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Thomas Green's best course of action involves leveraging his expertise and relationship-building capabilities to influence Frank Davis effectively. Recognizing the sources of power at play, Green should employ rational persuasion, consultation, and relational tactics aligned with organizational principles. By doing so, he can navigate Davis’s authority constructively, foster collaborative solutions, and uphold ethical standards. Ultimately, strategic use of influence tactics rooted in organizational behavior theory will empower Green to achieve his objectives while maintaining strong professional relationships.
References
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. Studies in Social Power, 150-167.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice. Allyn & Bacon.
Kotter, J. P. (2008). Power and influence. Harvard Business Review Press.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. McGraw-Hill.
Huczynski, A., & Buchanan, D. (2013). Organizational behavior (8th ed.). Pearson.
Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Harvard Business School Press.
Schriesheim, C. A., & Neider, L. L. (1996). Influence tactics and leader-member exchange: A multisource approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 462–473.