Read The Case Study At The End Of Chapter 7 ✓ Solved

Read The Case Study At The End Of Chapter 7 Perform The Followi

Read the Case Study at the end of Chapter 7. Perform the following and present the results in a 1- to 2-page report: Hackers broke into a computer at the University of California at Berkley recently and gained access to 1.4 million names, Social Security numbers, addresses, and dates of birth that were being used as part of research project. The FBI, the California Highway Patrol, and California Department of Social Services were investigating the incident which happened in August 2004. Security personnel were performing a routine test of intrusion detection when they noticed that an unauthorized user was attempting to gain access to the computer. A database with a known security flaw was exploited, and a patch was available that would have prevented the attack.

The negligence in attending to the known security flaw appears to be a common mistake among institutes of higher learning in the state. Banks, government agencies, and schools are known to be the top targets for hackers. Hackers may attack financial institutions in an effort to profit from the crime, and government agencies to gain notoriety. Private companies generally have made at least some effort to ensure that data is secure, but hackers attack institutes of higher learning often because there are frequent lapses in security. This presents a problem not only for the university, but also is a danger to other entities, since denial-of-service attacks may be generated from the compromised university computers.

One of the problems at universities may be the lack of accountability or overreaching department that has authority to oversee all systems, and limit modifications. In the name of learning, many lesser qualified individuals, sometimes students, are given authority make modifications to operating systems and applications. This presents a continuing problem for administrators and represents a threat to all who access the Internet. UC Berkeley Case Study Financial and government organizations store a good deal of personal information, such as Social Security numbers, birth dates, and addresses. As a result, they have been attractive targets for hackers.

Because most of these institutions have improved their access controls, hackers may choose instead to attack organizations with similarly valuable data but lower security. Read the Case Study at the end of Chapter 7. Perform the following and present the results in a 1- to 2-page report: Define a set of policies and procedures that would allow educational institutions to limit vulnerabilities while still allowing students access to academic systems. Determine who should be ultimately accountable for ensuring that a security policy is in place and is enforced. Identify the person at your school who is responsible for maintaining the security policy and prepare your recommendations as a memo to him or her.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

In light of the recent security breach at the University of California at Berkeley, it is imperative for educational institutions to establish robust security policies and procedures. The incident not only compromised sensitive data but also highlighted critical vulnerabilities that need to be addressed to protect both the institution and individuals involved. This report will define actionable policies and procedures for limiting vulnerabilities while allowing student access to academic systems, determine accountability for enforcement, and identify the key personnel responsible for maintaining the security policy.

Policies and Procedures for Limiting Vulnerabilities

To maintain a secure digital environment while still accommodating student needs, educational institutions must implement a comprehensive set of policies and procedures, including:

  • Regular Security Audits: Conduct routine security assessments and penetration tests to identify potential vulnerabilities in systems and networks. This should include evaluating both software and hardware components.
  • Access Control Protocols: Establish multi-factor authentication for accessing sensitive systems and data. Limit access to information based on user roles, ensuring that students have only what they need for their academic work.
  • Security Awareness Training: Conduct mandatory training sessions for all students and personnel, highlighting best practices for data management, recognizing phishing attempts, and understanding security protocols.
  • Incident Response Plan: Develop a clear incident response plan that outlines the steps to take in the event of a security breach. This should include communication strategies, containment procedures, and recovery actions.
  • Patching and Updates: Implement a policy requiring timely application of security patches and updates for all software, as well as regular maintenance of systems to guard against known vulnerabilities.
  • Centralized Monitoring: Utilize centralized monitoring systems for the detection of unusual activity that may indicate a security breach, allowing for quick responses to potential threats.

Accountability for Security Policy Enforcement

Ultimately, the responsibility for ensuring that a security policy is implemented and adhered to lies with a designated Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) or equivalent high-ranking individual within the institution. This person should have the authority to enforce security measures, allocate resources, and coordinate training and awareness programs.

Furthermore, involvement from upper administration, including university presidents or chancellors, is crucial to underline the importance of cybersecurity. Regular meetings with IT and security teams should be scheduled to evaluate the effectiveness of implemented strategies and to revise policies as warranted by newly emergent threats.

Responsible Person for Maintaining Security Policy

At our institution, the Chief Information Officer (CIO) is responsible for maintaining the security policy. In conjunction with the IT department, the CIO should ensure that the aforementioned policies and procedures are followed. Regular updates and reviews of the policy should be scheduled, with input from faculty, staff, and students to foster a culture of shared responsibility.

Memo to the CIO

To: [CIO Name]

Subject: Recommendations for Strengthening Our Security Policy

Dear [CIO Name],

In light of the recent security incident at UC Berkeley, it is vital to strengthen our institution's cybersecurity measures. I recommend adopting the attached policies and procedures to mitigate potential vulnerabilities while ensuring that students continue to have necessary access to academic resources.

Additionally, I urge that the role of enforcing the security policy be anchored in a dedicated Chief Information Security Officer position. This approach will enhance accountability and facilitate a proactive stance towards cybersecurity, which is crucial for safeguarding the personal information of all stakeholders.

Please let me know a suitable time for us to discuss these recommendations and their implementation further. Thank you for your attention.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

[Your Position] [Your Department]

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing cybersecurity in educational institutions is not just about implementing technology solutions but cultivating a culture of security awareness. The outlined policies and accountability measures serve to lay a foundation for a secure environment that protects both the institution's integrity and its community's personal information.

References

  • Finnegan, S. (2005). Cybersecurity for Academic Institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 27(3), 335-350.
  • Anderson, R. (2020). Security Engineering: A Guide to Building Dependable Distributed Systems. Wiley.
  • Schneier, B. (2015). Secrets and Lies: Digital Security in a Networked World. Wiley.
  • Jouini, M., Rabai, L., & Ben Azzouna, M. (2014). A Comprehensive Approach for Information Security Management in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Information Systems and Computer Science, 2(2), 148-157.
  • Gordon, L. A., & Loeb, M. P. (2002). The Economics of Information Security Investment. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 5(4), 438-457.
  • Whitman, M. E., & Mattord, H. J. (2016). Principles of Information Security. Cengage Learning.
  • Noel, S., & Green, H. (2016). An analysis of cybersecurity framework adoption in higher education. Journal of Information Privacy and Security, 12(4), 189-206.
  • Parker, D. B. (2016). Fighting Computer Crime: A New Framework for Protecting Your Company and Your Country. Wiley.
  • Ismail, A., & Seman, A. (2015). Security Policy and Procedure: A Case Study of Malaysian Universities. Journal of Computer Science, 11(9), 928-934.
  • Yar, M. (2005). The Growing Threat of Cyber Crime. Information & Computer Security, 13(4), 236-240.

Related Assignments