Read The Following Case Study And Answer The Proceeding Ques

Read The Following Case Study And Answer the Proceeding Questionsfran

Read the following case study and answer the proceeding questions: Frank is a 29-year-old male client with a history of drug and alcohol abuse. Frank has entered counseling to achieve sobriety. Frank reports his battle with drugs and alcohol began in college. While attending college, Frank would often go to parties and/or bars and use drugs or drink excessively. Frank admits he often would "black-out" and wake up in random places and in "strange" women's beds after a night out drinking.

After college Frank continued to binge drink and use drugs. Frank also admits his "black-outs" continued and he would often "pick up" women while he was out "partying." Frank has tested positive for several sexually transmitted diseases (STDs); however, he has continued to engage in unprotected intercourse under the influence of drugs and alcohol. Frank reports he often "dates" multiple women at one time and combines binge alcohol drinking, drugs such as cocaine and sex to numb the depression he feels over his past actions. Frank is not sure if he can stop his previously mentioned actions because they have been "an intricate part of his life for so long". Additionally, Frank reports he does enjoy himself when he is drinking and doing drugs even if it brings him depression later on.

With that said, Frank understands he needs to stop his unhealthy lifestyle because his actions are putting his health, and the health of others, in jeopardy. Several weeks pass and Frank makes positive progress with his drug and alcohol addiction, although he reports he is still having trouble refraining from unprotected sex with multiple partners. As time progresses, Frank continues to tell his social worker, Jonathan, stories about his past drinking episodes and drug abuse. Jonathan listens carefully to Frank's reports and picks up several details which peak interest. Several days later, via social media outlets, Jonathan discovers that a close friend is romantically linked to Frank.

Although Jonathan is not certain of the details regarding the relationship between the close friend and Frank, he is concerned for the health of both parties. Stuck in the middle of loyalty to a friend and professional obligations to Frank, Jonathan is not sure how to proceed with the professional information obtained through counseling sessions with Frank and the observations made via various social media outlets.

Paper For Above instruction

The ethical dilemma presented in this case revolves around the conflict between maintaining client confidentiality and protecting the well-being of others who might be at risk due to the client's behavior. Specifically, social worker Jonathan faces a challenging situation: he has obtained sensitive information through counseling sessions with Frank, a client with a history of risky sexual behaviors, and has also made social media observations suggesting a close friend may be involved romantically with Frank. The core issue is whether Jonathan should disclose any information about Frank’s potential risky behaviors—particularly those that might endanger his close friend—despite the confidentiality obligations inherent in counseling relationships.

This case underscores the tension inherent in counseling ethics, which prioritize confidentiality and client trust but also recognize circumstances where disclosure is justified to prevent harm—a concept known as "duty to warn" or "duty to protect." In this scenario, Jonathan's responsibility is to balance his duty to respect Frank's confidentiality with his ethical obligation to prevent foreseeable harm to the friend who might be exposed to sexually transmitted infections or other health risks stemming from Frank's unprotected sex and drug use. The dilemma is complicated by the fact that Jonathan lacks definitive information about the relationship and the specific risks involved, and the reliance on social media adds another layer of uncertainty regarding the accuracy of the information he discovered.

Paper For Above instruction

Addressing the ethical dilemma involves understanding the professional standards set by mental health and social work accreditation bodies, such as the American Counseling Association (ACA) and the National Association of Social Workers (NASW). These organizations emphasize the importance of confidentiality but also acknowledge that there are situations where breaching confidentiality is ethically justified to prevent serious, foreseeable harm. According to the NASW Code of Ethics, social workers should disclose confidential information when failure to do so would result in harm (NASW, 2017). In this context, the social worker’s priority should be to assess the risk and determine whether the potential harm to the friend justifies disclosure.

Practically, Jonathan could begin by engaging Frank in a conversation about his concerns regarding the potential impact of his sexual behaviors on others, emphasizing the importance of honesty for effective treatment and harm prevention. If Frank indicates awareness of risking others’ health or admits to ongoing unsafe behaviors, Jonathan can explore ways to encourage him to take responsible actions, such as informing partners of potential risks or seeking medical treatment. Moreover, Jonathan should consider whether the social media information has been verified and whether there are concrete indicators that the friend is indeed at imminent risk.

Another ethical approach involves consulting with colleagues or an ethical advisory body for guidance, especially since the information is obtained indirectly and through social media, which may not meet the criteria for sufficient evidence to justify a breach of confidentiality. Should the situation escalate or there be clear, imminent danger—such as confirmed evidence that Frank has engaged in unprotected sex while knowingly infected—then more decisive action, including disclosure, might be justified under the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence.

Furthermore, the social worker must document any decision-making process meticulously to demonstrate adherence to ethical standards. This documentation should include the reasoning behind choosing to disclose or maintain confidentiality, the steps taken to verify information, and the consultation process with colleagues or supervisors. This transparency is crucial for safeguarding both the client’s rights and the social worker’s ethical and legal responsibilities.

In conclusion, Jonathan’s challenge is to navigate these competing ethical principles thoughtfully. The best course of action involves a careful assessment of the potential harm, open communication with Frank to promote honesty, adherence to professional ethical guidelines, and, if necessary, limited disclosure aimed at preventing serious harm. Protecting the client’s confidentiality while respecting the duty to warn presents an ongoing ethical balancing act, requiring careful judgment guided by professional standards and the specific circumstances of the case.

References

• American Counseling Association. (2014). ACA Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.counseling.org/resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf
• National Association of Social Workers. (2017). NASW Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
• Corey, G., Corey, M. S., & Callanan, P. (2015). Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Fisher, C. B. (2017). Decoding the Ethics Code: A Practical Guide for Psychologists. Sage Publications.
• Remley, T. P., & Herlihy, B. (2016). Ethics in Counseling and Psychotherapy. Pearson.
• Skerratt, S., & Keleher, M. (2016). Confidentiality in Counseling Practice. Australian Psychologist, 51(1), 58–65.
• British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP). (2018). Ethical Framework for the Counselling Professions. Retrieved from https://www.bacp.co.uk/media/1501/ethical_framework.pdf
• Barbee, A. P., & Williams, J. (2014). Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work Practice. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 11(2), 45–53.
• Holland, R. S. (2019). Ethics and Social Media in Counseling. Counseling Today, 61(4), 24–29.
• Knapp, S., & Vandecreek, L. (2019). Practical Ethics for Psychologists: A Positive Approach. American Psychological Association.