Read The Innovation At International Foods Case Study

Read The Innovation At International Foods Case Study On Pages 234 238

Read the Innovation at International Foods Case Study on pages in the textbook. Answer the Discussion Questions at the end of the Case Study Discussion Questions 1. Describe the problem at IFG as succinctly as you can. Use this description to identify the main stakeholders. 2.

IFG can’t afford the resources to identify, define, cleanse, and validate all of its data. On the other hand, building yet another data mart to address a specific problem worsens the data situation. Propose a solution that will enable IFG to leverage a key business problem/opportunity using their BI tools that does not aggravate their existing data predicament.

Paper For Above instruction

The case study titled "Innovation at International Foods" presents a complex scenario faced by International Foods Group (IFG), emphasizing the challenges of managing and utilizing data effectively within the constraints of limited resources. The core problem at IFG revolves around their inability to adequately identify, define, cleanse, and validate all their data due to resource limitations. This impairs their capacity to leverage data for strategic decision-making and hampers overall operational efficiency. The main stakeholders include the company's executives, who are seeking to make data-driven decisions; the IT and data management teams, tasked with maintaining data quality and infrastructure; and the business units that depend on accurate data to inform their operations and strategic initiatives.

The primary challenge is the scarcity of resources necessary to perform comprehensive data management activities such as data cleansing and validation across all organizational data. Concurrently, the tendency to develop new data marts for specific problems exacerbates the situation by fragmenting data and increasing the complexity of data management efforts. This approach leads to redundant efforts, inconsistent data definitions, and further strains on limited resources, ultimately worsening the data quality and availability issues at IFG.

To address these issues without further burdening their data infrastructure, IFG should adopt a strategic approach centered around the intelligent leveraging of existing Business Intelligence (BI) tools and capabilities. One practical solution is to implement a data governance framework supported by a lightweight data management layer, such as metadata management and data catalogs, integrated with their current BI platform. This approach allows IFG to prioritize critical data domains that directly impact strategic decisions and operational efficiencies.

Specifically, IFG can utilize their BI tools to develop dashboards and reports that highlight inconsistencies and anomalies in real time, facilitating ongoing data validation without extensive manual cleansing. By focusing on key performance indicators (KPIs) that are most relevant to their strategic goals, the organization can derive maximum insight from the existing data infrastructure. Additionally, deploying automated data profiling and validation routines within their BI environment can help identify data quality issues proactively, enabling targeted data cleansing efforts that are resource-efficient.

Furthermore, fostering a culture of data literacy and stewardship within the organization can empower business units to take ownership of their data quality, decreasing the burden on centralized IT teams. Training and guidelines can help stakeholders understand how to maintain data quality standards and use BI tools effectively to detect and address issues proactively.

In essence, the key is to optimize and extend the capabilities of existing BI tools rather than creating new data marts or extensive data cleansing campaigns that are resource-prohibitive. By focusing on critical data domains, automating routine data validation processes, and cultivating shared responsibility for data quality, IFG can make significant strides in leveraging their data for strategic advantage without aggravating their data management challenges.

References

  • Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165-1188.
  • Giles, J. (2018). Data governance in practice: A case study. Journal of Data Management, 12(2), 45-55.
  • Inmon, W. H., & Linstedt, D. (2014). Data Architecture: A Primer for the CDO and Data Management Leader. Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Kimball, R., & Ross, M. (2013). The Data Warehouse Toolkit: The Definitive Guide to Dimensional Modeling. John Wiley & Sons.
  • McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 60-68.
  • Power, D. J. (2014). Using 'Big Data' to improve the quality of decision-making. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 1(1), 1-10.
  • Redman, T. C. (2016). Data Driven: Profiting from Your Most Important Business Asset. Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Sharda, R., Delen, D., & Turban, E. (2020). Business Intelligence and Analytics: Systems for Decision Support. Pearson.
  • Watson, H. J., & Wixom, B. H. (2007). The current state of business intelligence. Computer, 40(9), 96-99.
  • Zhao, G., & Liu, R. (2019). Improving Data Quality Management with Business Intelligence Tools. Journal of Data Science, 17(4), 502-521.

Related Assignments