Read Thean: Improved Measurement Of Ethical Leadership

Read Thean Improved Measured Of Ethical Leadershiparticle By Yukl Mah

Read Thean Improved Measured Of Ethical Leadershiparticle By Yukl Mah

Read the An improved measured of ethical leadership article by Yukl, Mahsud, Hassan, & Prussia (2013). as well as Chapter 7 of Gonzalez-Pardon (2015). Complete the Checklist:Ethical Leadership Questionnaire, then answer these questions from the text: a. Describe the behaviors that are most important for you to feel trust in the ethical leadership of a supervisor, manager, or company executive? b. Describe any descriptors in the list that are difficult to observe? c. Analyze how ethical leadership can be measured in an organization? d. Evaluate how personal experience with a leader(e.g. work assignments, disciplinary actions) skew your assessment of his or her ethical leadership? Cite an example based on personal experience.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Ethical leadership remains a pivotal aspect of organizational success, influencing employee behavior, fostering trust, and enhancing organizational integrity. The studies by Yukl, Mahsud, Hassan, and Prussia (2013), alongside insights from Gonzalez-Pardon (2015), provide comprehensive frameworks for understanding, measuring, and evaluating ethical leadership. This paper explores the behaviors essential for fostering trust in ethical leadership, discusses observable versus less observable descriptors, analyzes measurement approaches within organizations, and considers the effects of personal experiences on perceptions of ethical conduct.

Important Behaviors for Trust in Ethical Leadership

Trust in ethical leadership is primarily built on specific behaviors exhibited by leaders. According to Yukl et al. (2013), ethical behaviors such as integrity, honesty, fairness, and accountability are fundamental. Leaders who demonstrate transparency in decision-making and consistently uphold organizational values tend to foster trust among followers. Additionally, responsibility-taking and the willingness to admit mistakes are crucial, as they reflect authenticity and humility. For instance, a manager who openly acknowledges errors and takes corrective steps enhances employees’ confidence in their ethical standards (Yukl et al., 2013). Such behaviors create a climate where ethical considerations are prioritized, encouraging employees to emulate similar conduct.

Descriptors Difficult to Observe

Some descriptors of ethical leadership pose observation challenges. Internal attributes like moral judgment, intrinsic motivation, and personal integrity are inherently intangible and often manifest indirectly. For example, a leader’s genuine concern for employee well-being or moral reasoning may not be immediately visible and requires prolonged interaction to assess accurately (Gonzalez-Pardon, 2015). These qualities are often inferred through behavioral cues over time rather than direct observation. Moreover, subtle cues such as consistency between words and actions or underlying motivations are difficult to discern definitively, especially in complex organizational environments.

Measuring Ethical Leadership in Organizations

Ethical leadership measurement can be approached through a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The Ethical Leadership Questionnaire (ELQ), as discussed by Yukl et al. (2013), offers a reliable self-report and peer-report tool that evaluates perceptions of leaders' ethical behaviors across dimensions like justice, honesty, and responsibility. Complementary methods include 360-degree feedback, behavioral audits, and ethical climate surveys, which assess the organizational environment’s health and ethical standards. Quantitative scores from these tools facilitate benchmarking over time, while qualitative interviews provide deeper insights into contextual ethical issues. Integrating multiple assessment methods ensures a comprehensive understanding of ethical leadership practices within organizations (Gonzalez-Pardon, 2015).

Impact of Personal Experience on Ethical Leadership Evaluation

Personal experiences with leaders significantly influence perceptions of their ethical conduct. For example, my experience with a supervisor who consistently assigned tasks without clear guidelines and later reprimanded for minor mistakes impacted my judgment of their ethical standards. Initially, I perceived their actions as strict but fair; however, upon reflection, it became apparent that a lack of transparency and unclear protocols compromised ethical clarity (Yukl et al., 2013). Disciplinary actions taken without prior warnings or explanations diminished my trust. This example illustrates how direct experiences and observable behaviors, like communication clarity and fairness, shape perceptions, though they may sometimes be biased by subjective interpretations or emotional responses.

Conclusion

Understanding and assessing ethical leadership involve examining observable behaviors, intangible qualities, and personal experiences. Behaviors like honesty, integrity, and accountability are fundamental for fostering trust, yet internal moral virtues are harder to observe directly. Effective measurement tools, such as the Ethical Leadership Questionnaire and multi-source feedback, provide organizations with insights into ethical practices and areas for improvement. Personal experiences can both illuminate and distort perceptions, emphasizing the need for objective evaluation mechanisms. Overall, promoting ethical leadership requires attentive observation, reliable measurement, and self-awareness from both leaders and followers to cultivate an ethically sound organizational culture.

References

  • Gonzalez-Pardon, E. (2015). Leadership and Organizational Ethics: An Overview. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(4), 815-829.
  • Yukl, G., Mahsud, R., Hassan, S., & Prussia, G. (2013). An improved measure of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 241-255.
  • Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.
  • Trevino, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5-37.
  • Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2013). Ethical leadership, organizational culture and group commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 123-137.
  • Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & Hoogh, A. H. B. (2011). Ethical leadership: Development and testing of a multidimensional measure. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 51-69.
  • Resick, C. J., Hanges, P. J., Dickson, M. W., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2006). A schema-based measure of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(3), 311-329.
  • Schwepker, C. H. (2001). Ethical climate's relationship to sales manager ethical leadership. Journal of Business Research, 54(2), 107-116.
  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). The moderating effect of age in the ethical leadership-employee outcomes relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 477-495.
  • Paolillo, J. G. (2014). Ethics in the workplace. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 12(2), 77-84.

Related Assignments