Read This Article By C. James B. (2011, September 30)

Read This Articlesammer C James B 2011 September 30patient

Read this article: Sammer, C. & James, B. (2011, September 30). Patient safety culture: The nursing unit leader’s role . OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 16(3), Manuscript 3. In the Hospital Hope scenario, what do you think was the most important factor that led to the change in practice in the SICU? If you worked in a facility that needed a practice change, what framework would you use and why?

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The article by Sammer and James (2011) emphasizes the critical role of nursing unit leaders in fostering a patient safety culture within healthcare settings. Understanding how leadership influences practice change is essential in improving patient outcomes, especially in high-stakes environments such as the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU). The Hospital Hope scenario serves as a practical illustration of how targeted interventions and cultural shifts can lead to meaningful improvements in safety practices. This paper explores the most significant factor driving change in the SICU, as depicted in the scenario, and discusses a suitable framework for implementing practice change in healthcare facilities that require such improvements.

Most Important Factor Leading to Practice Change in the SICU

In the Hospital Hope scenario, the most pivotal factor facilitating change was the development and cultivation of a safety-oriented culture led by nursing leadership. Leaders in the SICU recognized the importance of creating an environment where safety protocols are prioritized, openly discussed, and integrated into daily practice. According to Sammer and James (2011), leadership engagement is fundamental in shaping attitudes and behaviors of nursing staff toward patient safety. In the scenario, the SICU leadership actively promoted open communication, encouraged reporting of errors without fear of punishment, and supported continuous education about safety protocols. This cultural shift—moving from a blame-based environment to one emphasizing learning and accountability—was instrumental in effecting sustainable practice change.

Furthermore, leadership’s role in fostering teamwork and facilitating ongoing training contributed significantly to the change. When nursing leaders model safety behaviors and emphasize their importance, staff are more likely to adopt these practices themselves. The scenario also highlights how engaging staff in safety initiatives and recognizing their contributions increases buy-in and collective responsibility. This comprehensive approach, rooted in leadership commitment, was the most essential factor in transforming safety practices in the SICU.

Framework for Practice Change in Healthcare Facilities

In a healthcare setting requiring practice change, I would advocate for the use of the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle, a component of the Model for Improvement. This framework offers several advantages. Primarily, it promotes a systematic approach to implementing change by fostering planning, testing, and refining interventions in small, manageable cycles (Langley et al., 2010). The iterative nature of PDSA allows teams to evaluate the effectiveness of changes, make adjustments based on real-world data, and build upon successful strategies.

The PDSA framework aligns with the emphasis on leadership and organizational culture highlighted by Sammer and James (2011). Leaders can facilitate the process by setting clear objectives, providing necessary resources, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement. Its flexibility makes it adaptable to diverse healthcare environments, whether in acute care settings like ICUs or outpatient clinics.

The reason for choosing PDSA is that it encourages engagement at all levels, promotes rapid testing of interventions, and emphasizes data-driven decision-making—critical components for successful practice change. When implemented effectively, PDSA can lead to sustainable improvements across various domains, including patient safety, quality of care, and operational efficiency.

Implementation and Impact

Applying the PDSA cycle involves identifying specific safety issues within the SICU, such as medication errors or infection control breaches, and designing interventions aimed at these problems. For instance, a team might pilot a new protocol for medication reconciliation, evaluate its impact, and refine the process accordingly. Leadership plays a vital role in facilitating training, motivating staff participation, and monitoring outcomes.

The success of this approach depends heavily on organizational culture, reinforced by leadership commitment, as highlighted by Sammer and James (2011). Cultivating an environment where staff feel empowered to suggest improvements, report issues, and participate in decision-making enhances the likelihood of sustained change. The PDSA cycle provides a structured yet flexible method to guide these efforts, ultimately leading to safer practices and improved patient outcomes.

Conclusion

The Hospital Hope scenario underscores the importance of leadership and culture in driving practice change within the SICU. The most influential factor was the development of a safety culture supported by nursing leaders who promoted open communication, teamwork, and continuous education. For healthcare facilities aiming to implement practice change, the PDSA cycle offers a practical, adaptable framework that emphasizes iterative testing, staff engagement, and data-informed decision-making. Employing such a framework, underpinned by committed leadership, can facilitate meaningful, sustained improvements in patient safety and quality of care.

References

  1. Sammer, C., & James, B. (2011). Patient safety culture: The nursing unit leader’s role. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 16(3), Manuscript 3.
  2. Langley, G. J., Moen, R., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T., Norman, C., & Provost, L. P. (2010). The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. Jossey-Bass.
  3. Kirkland, J., & Harvey, J. (2014). Building a culture of safety in healthcare. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 23(2), 145-152.
  4. Pronovost, P., et al. (2006). An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. The New England Journal of Medicine, 355(26), 2725-2732.
  5. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). (2019). Guide to Patient Safety in Hospitals. AHRQ Publication.
  6. Weiner, B. J., et al. (2011). Organizational culture and patient safety climate in hospitals. Leadership in Health Services, 24(2), 111-124.
  7. Berwick, D. M. (2009). What ‘patient safety’ is and what it is not. BMJ Quality & Safety, 18(1), 1-3.
  8. Leape, L. L., & Berwick, D. M. (2005). Five years after To Err Is Human: What have we learned? JAMA, 293(19), 2384-2390.
  9. Pronovost, P., et al. (2008). Creating a safety culture: Improving adverse event reporting and learning from errors. Safety Science, 46(8), 1023-1034.
  10. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 1(1), 1-19.

Related Assignments