Reading Material Needed To Answer Questions And Assignments

Reading Material Needed To Answer Questions And Assignmentsgrant A

Reading material needed to answer questions and assignments!! Grant, A. (2021). Think again.  Chapter 3: “The Joy of Being Wrong: The Thrill of Not Believing Everything You Think‟  Chapter 4: “The Good Fight Club: The Psychology of Constructive Conflict‟ Biblical Reading: Romans 12:1-21 NRSV Philosophy: Augustine & Medieval Philosophy  Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Augustine  Introduction  3. Augustine and Philosophy  5.2 Illumination  5.3 Faith and Reason  Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Illumination  3. Augustine Part A: The acts of philosophizing and "thinking again" are best accomplished through discussion, conversation, and sometimes even debate. This is how ideas become fleshed out and conversations move forward. As such, students are expected to produce a robust, video discussion post this week based on their engagement with course materials. The primary qualifier for all discussions is that they must have their foundation in either our philosophical or textbook readings for the week and connect directly to one or more key excerpts, ideas, passages, or concepts. The prompt for this week's video discussion revolves around the following questions: What would you say is the most significant concept or compelling idea presented in this week's course material? Why do you hold that position? Part B: Complicated concepts require careful consideration. This week students will produce an Articulation Artifact showing their engagement with, and mastery of this week’s readings and resources. Such articulations can take the form of one of the following mediums, 5 - 7 part slide deck (Google Slides or Powerpoint are acceptable), must include references. Regardless of the method chosen, each student’s goal is to present a reasonable level of understanding for this week’s core theses, important premises, and key concepts. 7th edition APA guidelines are required. Part C:Reflection: Medieval Philosophy, Augustine, and Individual Rethinking The purpose of education and philosophy is not to provide answers to all of life’s questions but to help practitioners ask better questions. For this class specifically, Journal Reflections provide an opportunity to take our discussions, questions, and ponderings one step further by making them applicable to our life, work, and relationships. For this class specifically, Journal Reflections provide an opportunity to take our discussions, questions, and ponderings one step further by making them applicable to our life, work, and relationships. After reflecting on the readings, resources, and other discussions, write a reflective journal entry on the following question(s):  What is on your mind from this week’s material and discussion?  What captured your attention or made you think?  What ideas or concepts did you find helpful, compelling or valuable?  What ideas or concepts did you find less helpful?  What ideas or concepts did you find immediately applicable to your life, work, or relationships? How will you apply them? The Reflection must be words, in paragraph formatting, and using 7th ed APA guidelines: Times New Roman or Arial, 12-point font, double line spacing, a title page, in-text citations, and a reference page. Your grade will be determined according to the Reflection Rubric embedded in this assignment dropbox. Reading material needed for assignments: Required Readings & Resources Grant, A. (2021). Think again.  Chapter 5: “Dances with Foes: How to Win Debates and Influence People‟  Chapter 6: “Bad Blood on the Diamond: Diminishing Prejudice by Destabilizing Stereotype‟  Chapter 7: “Vaccine Whisperers and Mild-Mannered Interrogators: How the Right Kind of Listening Motivates People to Change‟ Part A: The acts of philosophizing and "thinking again" are best accomplished through discussion, conversation, and sometimes even debate. This is how ideas become fleshed out and conversations move forward. As such, students are expected to produce a robust, original discussion post based on their engagement with course materials. The primary qualifier for all discussions is that they must have their foundation in either our philosophical or textbook readings for the week and connect directly to one or more key excerpts, ideas, passages, or concepts. The prompt for this week's original post discussion revolves around the following question(s): What would you say is the most significant concept or compelling idea presented in this week's course material? Why do you hold that position? Part B: Complicated concepts require careful consideration. This week students will produce an Articulation Artifact showing their engagement with, and mastery of this week’s readings and resources. Such articulations can take the form of one of the following mediums, in a 300 word essay. Part C: Reflection: Rationalism, Descartes, and Interpersonal Rethinking Assignment The purpose of education and philosophy is not to provide answers to all of life’s questions but to help practitioners ask better questions. For this class specifically, Journal Reflections provide an opportunity to take our discussions, questions, and ponderings one step further by making them applicable to our life, work, and relationships. After reflecting on the readings, resources, and other discussions, write a reflective journal entry on the following question(s):  What is on your mind from this week’s material and discussion?  What captured your attention or made you think?  What ideas or concepts did you find helpful, compelling or valuable?  What ideas or concepts did you find less helpful?  What ideas or concepts did you find immediately applicable to your life, work, or relationships? How will you apply them?