Recommend A Change Strategy And Process For Theresa And Mike

Recommend a change strategy and process for Theresa and Mike

Theresa Tramlin, CEO of UWEAR, and her colleague Mike are approaching the conclusion of a significant merger with PALEDENIM. The affiliated organization is committed to establishing a new, values-driven culture, including a comprehensive code of conduct, while navigating a series of substantial organizational changes such as alterations in work roles, reporting structures, and key business processes. To successfully guide this transition, a well-structured change management framework is essential. This framework will help ensure employee commitment, align personnel, and foster a unified organizational culture. A strategic recommendation rooted in established change management models can serve as a roadmap for Theresa and Mike as they lead their teams through this transformative phase.

Overall Change Management Model Selection and Justification

Among the established models, Kurt Lewin’s Change Management Model—the Unfreeze-Change-Refreeze process—offers a straightforward yet effective approach tailored for organizational change of this scope. Lewin’s model emphasizes preparing the organization for change (unfreezing), executing the change (changing), and stabilizing the organization in the new state (refreezing). Its simplicity facilitates clear communication and manageable stages, making it especially suitable for a complex merger involving multiple layers of change. By using this model, Theresa and Mike can systematically unfreeze old behaviors, introduce new processes and values, and embed these changes into the organizational culture, ensuring sustainability.

The Value of Lewin’s Model for the UWEAR-PALEDENIM Merger

The Lewin model’s emphasis on preparation and stabilization aligns well with the needs of the UWEAR-PALEDENIM merger. The unfreezing stage is critical for challenging existing assumptions, overcoming resistance, and motivating employees to accept new cultural and procedural paradigms. During the change phase, focused communication, training, and participative involvement can facilitate adoption of new roles and behaviors. Finally, the refreezing stage consolidates the changes, embedding new values, systems, and behaviors into the day-to-day operations, which is crucial given the significant shifts in work roles, reporting structures, and business processes. Moreover, the model’s cyclical nature enables continuous refinement and adjustment, a vital aspect in dynamic organizational environments such as mergers.

Specific Actions Based on Lewin’s Model

To operationalize Lewin’s model, Theresa and Mike should undertake several targeted actions:

• Unfreezing:
  • Communicate transparently about the reasons for the merger, emphasizing benefits and shared vision.
  • Address employee concerns proactively to reduce resistance and build trust.
  • Identify and challenge existing organizational assumptions that conflict with the new culture.
• Changing:
  • Implement training programs to develop new skills aligned with revised roles and processes.
  • Engage employees at all levels in participative decision-making to foster ownership of the change.
  • Reinforce new values and behaviors through leadership exemplification and communication.
• Refreezing:
  • Embed new practices into policies, procedures, and performance management systems.
  • Recognize and celebrate milestones and successes to reinforce the new organizational culture.
  • Maintain open channels for feedback to facilitate ongoing refinement and stability.

Managing the People Side of Change and Resistance

Effectively managing employee resistance requires understanding its sources—fear of the unknown, loss of control, or perceived threats to job security—and proactively addressing these concerns. Theresa and Mike should adopt transformational leadership behaviors, such as demonstrating empathy, credibility, and consistency to foster trust. Transparent communication is pivotal, providing clarity about the change process, expectations, and support systems. Empowering employees through involvement in planning and decision-making can reduce uncertainty and resistance. Furthermore, providing ongoing training, coaching, and support systems, including counseling or peer networks, can help employees adapt to new roles and expectations.

Key Leadership and Management Behaviors for Effective Change

Successful change leadership during a merger hinges on specific behaviors:

• Modeling the Change: Leaders must exemplify the new values and behaviors, demonstrating commitment and consistency.
• Communicating Effectively: Open, honest, and empathetic communication helps alleviate fears and dispel misinformation.
• Building Trust: Leaders should maintain transparency and involve employees in the change process to foster trust.
• Providing Support and Resources: Offering training, coaching, and emotional support enhances employee confidence.
• Recognizing and Reinforcing Success: Celebrating milestones reinforces positive behaviors and sustains momentum.

Additional Topics for Further Research

To deepen the effectiveness of the change management framework, additional information is needed on the following topics:

• Strategies for managing resistance specific to mergers and acquisitions.
• Impact of organizational culture on change processes and how to align cultures post-merger.
• Evaluation metrics for assessing change readiness and progress during a merger.
• Best practices for leadership development during periods of significant organizational change.

Research Insights from Peer-Reviewed Articles

Research from Cameron and Quinn (2011) underscores the importance of culture assessment and alignment in merger success, emphasizing that cultural compatibility reduces resistance and accelerates integration. Their findings suggest that explicit strategies to understand and bridge cultural differences are vital for effective change management. Additionally, Kotter’s (1997) eight-step process emphasizes creating urgency and consolidating gains, which can mitigate resistance during critical transition phases. Applying Kotter’s model alongside Lewin’s provides a comprehensive approach to managing both the human and structural elements of change, aligning with the complex nature of the merger scenario at UWEAR and PALEDENIM.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a structured change management approach such as Lewin’s model offers a practical and adaptable framework for UWEAR and PALEDENIM’s merger. By systematically unfreezing existing norms, implementing change through active engagement, and refreezing new behaviors and structures, Theresa and Mike can guide their organization through the complexities of cultural integration, role redefinition, and process realignment. Coupled with proactive resistance management and transformational leadership behaviors, this approach can foster sustainable change, promote organizational cohesion, and lay the foundation for a values-driven, high-performing organization. Continuous learning and adaptation, supported by ongoing research and feedback, will be essential for navigating future challenges and ensuring long-term success.

References

• Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. Jossey-Bass.
• Kotter, J. P. (1997). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. Harper & Row.
• Appelbaum, S. H., Habashy, S., Malo, J.-L., & Shafiq, H. (2012). Back to the future: Revisiting Kotter's 8-step change model. Journal of Management Development, 31(8), 764–782.
• Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 293–315.
• Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A Model for Change in Business, Government, and Our Community. Prosci.
• Lines, R. (2004). Influence of participation in strategic change initiatives on change support. Journal of Change Management, 4(3), 193–215.
• Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 390–395.
• King, W. R., & He, J. (2005). A framework for research on information technology-enabled organizational transformation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 263–269.
• Sch features, B., & Mor, A. (2022). Leading Organizational Change During Merger and Acquisition: Challenges and Strategies. Journal of Change Management, 22(1), 45–62.