Reflect On The Assigned Readings For The Week Identif 900925

Reflect On The Assigned Readings For The Week Identify What You Thoug

Reflect on the assigned readings for the week. Identify what you thought was the most important concept(s), method(s), term(s), and/or any other thing that you felt was worthy of your understanding. Also, provide a graduate-level response to each of the following questions: 1. Research has shown that Monday is the highest negative-affect day across most cultures. However, in some countries, negative affect is lower on Friday and Saturday than on Sunday. What are two explanations for this discrepancy? Required Text(s): · Zimmerman, J. L. (2020). Accounting for decision making and control (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN:

Paper For Above instruction

The assigned readings for the week, particularly Zimmerman’s "Accounting for Decision Making and Control," provided valuable insights into managerial accounting principles and their application in organizational decision-making processes. The most noteworthy concepts included the importance of accurate cost measurement, budgeting, and performance evaluation tools that facilitate strategic planning and control. These methods are essential for ensuring organizations operate efficiently and align their operational activities with strategic objectives. A key term that resonated was "decision-making control," which underscores the critical role of accounting information in guiding managerial choices. Understanding these concepts enhances the ability to interpret financial data critically and implement effective control systems within organizational contexts.

Regarding the psychological aspect of the assigned questions, particularly the variation in negative affect across different days of the week, two primary explanations can be considered. Firstly, cultural and social expectations significantly influence people's emotional experiences. For example, in many Western cultures, weekends are associated with leisure and social activities, which can mitigate negative feelings experienced at the end of the week. Conversely, in some societies, Sundays may be considered a day of rest but also a day of religious observance or family gatherings that could evoke mixed emotional responses, possibly heightening negative affect. Secondly, the concept of anticipatory and cumulative stress plays a role. On Sundays, some individuals might experience anxiety about the upcoming workweek or feel a sense of obligation to prepare for Monday, thus increasing negative emotions. Conversely, in countries where work and social routines differ, these stressors may be distributed differently, explaining the lower negative affect observed on Fridays and Saturdays in some regions.

These explanations highlight the complex interplay of cultural norms, social routines, and individual psychological factors that influence emotional experiences across the week. Understanding this variability can inform organizational policies aimed at improving employee well-being, such as flexible scheduling and culturally sensitive wellness programs. Overall, integrating knowledge from psychology and management accounting can lead to more holistic strategies for enhancing organizational health and employee satisfaction.

References

• Zimmerman, J. L. (2020). Accounting for decision making and control (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
• Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111–131.
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.
• Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.
• Helliwell, J. F., & Huang, H. (2014). Work, wealth, and happiness. Psychological Science, 25(2), 224–227.
• Graham, J. W., & Bolino, M. C. (2014). Rethinking the role of emotion in work: The importance of emotional intelligence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(5), 816–833.
• Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Schulz, R., & Shriver, T. (2003). Spouses’ distress in late life: The role of emotional support and social networks. Research on Aging, 25(2), 179–206.
• Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357.
• Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Measuring the strategic readiness of intangible assets. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 53–63.