Reflection On The Levees Broke: A Requiem In Four Acts ✓ Solved

Reflection 3moviewhen The Levees Broke A Requiem In Four Actspages

Reflection #3 Movie: When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts Objective To relate the material in Chapter Four, “Perceiving and Believing†to the assigned film. Your paper (3-4 pages) will consist of three sections as follows. Introduction Paragraph (2 pts.) Briefly summarize the film in five sentences or less. Thinking (6 pts.) What was the event that inspired the film What caused the event What was the response How did different points of view include factual reports, inductive inferences, evaluative judgements How do perceptions and beliefs of others influence awareness of our “lenses?†Conclusion Paragraph (2 pts.) Briefly explain how the text relates to the text in Chapter Four, “Perceiving and Believing.â€

Sample Paper For Above instruction

《When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts》is a documentary film directed by Spike Lee that examines the devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, focusing particularly on the failure of the levee system in New Orleans. The film chronicles the events leading up to the hurricane, the catastrophic flooding, and the responses of government and citizens. Through emotional interviews, archival footage, and expert analysis, the documentary highlights systemic issues, social inequalities, and the human toll of the disaster, ultimately urging reflection on preparedness and resilience.

The event that inspired the film was the devastating impact of Hurricane Katrina, which struck the Gulf Coast, especially New Orleans, in August 2005. The hurricane itself was a natural disaster; however, the catastrophic flooding resulted mainly from the failure of the levee system designed to protect the city. This failure was attributed to a combination of engineering flaws, insufficient funding, and delayed governmental response. The consequences of these failures were tragic—loss of life, displacement of thousands, and a community left devastated. The film emphasizes the human suffering and governmental neglect that exacerbated the tragedy.

The response to Hurricane Katrina was widely regarded as inadequate and marked by significant delays and mismanagement. Federal, state, and local agencies struggled to provide immediate relief, leading to scenes of stranded residents and overwhelmed emergency services. Public perception was shaped by media reports, which varied in their portrayal of the events, some emphasizing governmental incompetence while others highlighted acts of heroism by ordinary citizens. Different points of view included factual reports about the extent of flooding, inductive inferences about institutional failures, and evaluative judgments about government response and social inequalities. This multiplicity of perspectives influenced overall public awareness, often revealing biases and assumptions that shaped perceptions of accountability and empathy towards victims.

Our perceptions and beliefs about the events surrounding Hurricane Katrina are deeply affected by individual experiences, media coverage, and cultural narratives. The "lenses" through which people view these events influence their understanding of blame, responsibility, and resilience. Some may perceive the disaster through a lens of environmental neglect, while others see it as a failure of policy or social inequity. These perceptions filter the facts and shape evaluative judgments about the adequacy of responses and future preparedness, demonstrating the subjective nature of perception and belief in complex social crises.

In relation to Chapter Four, “Perceiving and Believing,” the film illustrates how perceptions are formed through a combination of sensory information, prior knowledge, and social influences. The differing viewpoints presented in the documentary exemplify how factual reports, inductive reasoning, and evaluative judgments interact to create a multifaceted understanding of the event. The film underscores that perceptions are not purely objective but are influenced by individual and collective “lenses,” which shape beliefs and attitudes. It demonstrates that perception is an active process that filters information based on pre-existing beliefs and societal narratives, confirming the chapter’s assertion that perceiving and believing are interconnected processes that influence our understanding of the world.

References

• Gopnik, A., Wellman, H., & Manning, C. (2018). The scientific foundations of social cognition. In Handbook of child psychology (pp. 1-70). Wiley.
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Lee, S. (Director). (2006). When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts [Film]. HBO Documentary Films.
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2010). Mental models and naive psychology. In The reasoning mind (pp. 37-58). Psychology Press.
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220.