Reflection Paper Topics With Grading Rubric You Will Write

Reflection Paper Topics With Grading Rubricyou Will Write A1000 1500

Write a word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See the Course Outline for the due date. This assignment is worth 300 points, or 30% of your grade. DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK. You will attach a file in the box at the bottom of this page.

Students will demonstrate their ability to construct arguments about issues of both personal and universal significance, showing that they can develop cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments. They should be able to distinguish relevant points that form a logical argument and construct effective criticisms using appropriate counter-examples. The assignment involves reading one of the following articles: The Frivolity of Evil, How and How Not to Love Mankind, What We Have to Lose, or Roads to Serfdom. For the selected article, you will write a word response addressing each of the following points in your own words:

  • What is the author's main argument?
  • How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)?
  • Do you agree or disagree with him?
  • Why or why not?
  • Apply the insights of at least two readings studied in this course (chapters 1-9) to your analysis, explaining how the philosophers' insights are relevant to the topic you discuss.

Note: The articles are complex; the author uses extensive vocabulary. Have dictionary.com handy as you read. This essay aims to demonstrate your ability to analyze and evaluate complex philosophical arguments. Only one attempt is allowed for this assignment.

Paper For Above instruction

The reflection paper requires a thorough analysis of one of four selected philosophical articles, focusing on understanding and critiquing the author's main argument, supporting evidence, and your personal stance. The task involves engaging critically with the text, applying philosophical insights from prior course readings, and articulating a well-reasoned position in clear, scholarly language.

Choosing an article such as The Frivolity of Evil or Roads to Serfdom, students must identify the core thesis of the author, analyze how they support this thesis—through logic, evidence, or ancillary arguments—and then articulate their agreement or disagreement based on reasoned reflection. Importantly, students must ground their critique or support in philosophical reasoning, incorporating insights from at least two other course readings.

For example, if analyzing Hannah Arendt’s discussion of evil in The Frivolity of Evil, students might explore her argument on the banality of evil and relate it to Sartre’s notions of individual moral responsibility or Mill’s utilitarianism to evaluate how evil manifests in societal systems. This comparative analysis will demonstrate critical engagement with philosophical theories and apply them effectively to the article’s themes.

The writing should be concise, logical, and coherent, following MLA format for citations and references. Quotations from the article should be brief and integrated seamlessly into the argument, with proper citation and explanation. The paper should be approximately 1000 words, presenting a balanced analysis that demonstrates understanding of complex ideas, critique, and application of philosophical insights.

References

  • Dalrymple, N. (Year). Title of the article. Journal/Source.
  • Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. Viking Press.
  • Sartre, J.-P. (1943). Being and Nothingness. Routledge.
  • Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
  • Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations. W. Taylor.
  • Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Prussia.
  • Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and Punish. Vintage Books.
  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). The Social Contract. LeLibraire.
  • Berlin, I. (1958). Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford University Press.

Related Assignments