Relevant And Irrelevant Costs In Company Name Change ✓ Solved

Relevant and Irrelevant Costs in Company Name Change

When making a large company decision such as a name change, there are relevant and irrelevant costs associated that need to be considered. These would include implicit costs, explicit costs, sunk costs, unavoidable costs, and incremental costs. A relevant cost is a cost that is relative to the decision being considered. In this scenario, changing the company name from Summer Lawn Care to Lawn and Tree Care presents a relevant cost impact. The relevant cost is also considered an incremental cost, which refers to future costs based on a decision to be made.

The relevant costs to be considered in this scenario would include the costs of changing business signage, state and federal organization fees, legal fees associated with changing the name, updated business cards, website redesign, miscellaneous office expenses, and advertising costs. Conversely, irrelevant costs are those that do not affect the decision being made. These include both unavoidable and sunk costs. Unavoidable costs are expenses that are contractually obligated to be paid, like management salaries and equipment leases. Sunk costs, meanwhile, are past costs that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered.

In the context of a company name change, sunk costs may involve investments in company uniforms, vehicle signage, and existing advertisements. The distinction between sunk costs and unavoidable costs is important: sunk costs are expenses that have already been paid, while unavoidable costs are future expenses that will occur regardless of the decision made. Both sunk and unavoidable costs are classified as explicit costs, which refer to actual out-of-pocket payments made for goods and services.

Implicit costs, as defined, represent the lost opportunities associated with using a resource for a specific purpose instead of its alternative uses. For instance, if funds from a savings account are withdrawn to cover the name change, the interest that would have been earned represents an implicit cost. Therefore, losing the opportunity to invest those funds elsewhere highlights the implicit costs involved in such company decisions.

Relevance of Costs in a Decision-Making Context

When discussing the partner's vision for a name change, it is important to understand the underlying rationale. The partner advocating for the change to Lawn and Tree Care believes it will better communicate the range of services provided and is likely to increase customer engagement beyond just the summer months. Although the other partner may be hesitant due to sunk costs from previous expenditures on marketing materials, this decision should be examined holistically. Sunk costs, while regrettable, should not dictate future decisions as they will not change regardless of the adoption of a new name.

As mentioned by Douglas (2012), the potential for increased profitability emerges from the name change, as it can position the company for year-round business. Moreover, strategies can be implemented to minimize the financial impact of the transition by gradually phasing out old branding rather than discarding it outright. For instance, utilizing existing business cards while updating some elements strategically can help alleviate the burden of sunk costs.

Furthermore, different types of costs must be analyzed to make a comprehensive decision. Explicit costs are easier to identify since they involve direct monetary payments. Implicit costs, however, may not be as visible yet play a crucial role in overall cost assessment. For example, time and resources devoted to the name change can represent significant implicit costs.

Cost Analysis in Competitive Markets

The discussion naturally leads into competitive markets, particularly with the Bulls Eye department store's context. As management seeks to adapt and increase profitability, they must assess their market position within a local oligopoly where few competitors, like Walmart and Target, dominate. Decisions in this environment can affect the performance of each outlet, meaning comprehensive market analysis becomes critical.

The location of Bulls Eye is vital to its operational strategy, especially considering the nearest competitor is 49 miles away. Thus, understanding local demand and preferences becomes paramount when deciding to either raise prices or maintain them. Price elasticity is a fundamental concept to apply here; a relationship exists between price changes and customer demand. Increasing prices on competitively priced items could be ethically sound if sales reports indicate high demand.

Nonetheless, management must tread carefully regarding price increases, as opportunity costs also include the potential loss of loyal customers. Competitive pressures from online retailers like Amazon amplify the importance of maintaining a loyal customer base since many shoppers may pivot to buying online to obtain better deals or delivery services.

In conclusion, the analysis of relevant and irrelevant costs plays a critical role in strategic decision-making regarding a company name change or adjustments to pricing strategy in competitive markets like that faced by Bulls Eye Department Store. Both explicit and implicit costs must be considered alongside market dynamics to formulate effective actions that secure profit while nurturing customer relationships.

References

• Douglas, E. (2012). Managerial Economics (1st ed.) [Electronic version].
• Douglas, E. (2012). Managerial Economics. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education.
• Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
• Varian, H.R. (2010). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach (8th ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
• Kahn, M. E., & Lessem, N. (2020). The Farmer's Last Stand: What Makes a Good Sustainable Business Model? Sustainability, 12(15), 6042.
• Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2017). Microeconomics (9th ed.). New York: Pearson.
• Stiglitz, J.E., & Walsh, C.E. (2006). Principles of Microeconomics (4th ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
• Oliveira, A. F., & Teixeira, A. C. (2021). Economic Cost in Public Sectors: A Review. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(3), 95-118.
• Krugman, P., & Wells, R. (2018). Microeconomics (5th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.