Replay Question 1: Type Of Health Care Spending To Show

Replay Question 1one Type Of Health Care Spending That Should Be Cons

One type of healthcare spending that should be considered wasteful involves the treatment provided to patients who experience never events. Never events refer to serious, preventable medical errors that should never happen, such as surgical mistakes, wrong-site surgeries, or postoperative infections. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ, 2019), these events are indicative of systemic failures in healthcare safety measures. To mitigate such occurrences, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented policies stipulating that Medicare would no longer reimburse hospitals for costs associated with never events. This policy aims to incentivize healthcare providers to implement stricter safety protocols and reduce the incidence of preventable errors. Eliminating or reducing spending on treatments related to never events not only curtails unnecessary financial expenditure but also enhances overall care quality by fostering safer healthcare environments. Hospitals are thus encouraged to adopt improved training, rigorous checklists, and safety protocols designed to prevent such errors before they happen, leading to better health outcomes and more efficient use of healthcare resources.

Paper For Above instruction

Healthcare spending is a complex landscape, characterized by various forms of expenditures that sometimes fail to contribute meaningfully to patient outcomes. Among these, wasteful spending is a significant concern for policymakers, providers, and payers aiming to optimize healthcare efficiencies. A prominent example of such waste is the expenditure related to preventable medical errors, specifically never events. Never events are egregious errors that are entirely preventable and should never occur in a properly functioning healthcare system. These include adverse surgical events, wrong-site surgeries, and retained surgical items, which often lead to additional treatments, prolonged hospital stays, or even irreversible patient harm (AHRQ, 2019).

The financial implications of never events are substantial. According to CMS policies, hospitals are no longer reimbursed for costs associated with treating complications arising from these preventable errors, which places financial responsibility on the institutions to improve safety protocols (CMS, 2018). This economic disincentive has been pivotal in motivating hospitals to adopt rigorous safety measures such as checklists, staff training, and safety culture initiatives aimed at error reduction. The strategic focus on preventing never events aligns with overarching goals of enhancing patient safety and reducing unnecessary healthcare expenditures. It is an example of how targeted policy interventions can lead to tangible reductions in wasteful spending while simultaneously improving healthcare quality.

Beyond the financial considerations, addressing never events emphasizes a fundamental shift towards a culture of safety within healthcare institutions. Creating an environment where safety protocols are meticulously followed reduces the incidence of serious errors and builds trust among patients. For example, hospitals that employ standardized surgical safety checklists, environmental controls, and team communication protocols report fewer adverse events (Haynes et al., 2009). These improvements translate into fewer resource-consuming complications and re-admissions, ultimately delivering better health outcomes at lower costs.

Furthermore, the endeavor to eliminate avoidable errors drives systemic improvements. It necessitates continuous staff education, process standardization, and the adoption of technological innovations such as electronic health records and barcode medication administration systems. These tools facilitate accurate patient identification, accurate medication delivery, and clear communication among providers—key elements in preventing never events. Therefore, investments in safety infrastructure, although initially costly, ultimately yield significant cost savings by preventing costly complications and hospital readmissions related to errors.

In conclusion, healthcare spending on treating injuries from never events represents a clear area of waste that can be curtailed through effective policy and safety interventions. By shifting focus towards error prevention, healthcare systems can reduce unnecessary expenditures, improve patient outcomes, and foster a culture of safety. Continuing efforts to eliminate preventable errors are vital to promoting both fiscal responsibility and quality care within the broader landscape of the American healthcare system (AHRQ, 2019; CMS, 2018; Haynes et al., 2009).

References

• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). (2019). Never Events. https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/reports/engage/index.html
• Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). (2018). Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HACs). https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/HospitalAcqCond
• Haynes, A. B., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., et al. (2009). A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. The New England Journal of Medicine, 360(5), 491-499.
• Bentley, T. S., et al. (2008). Waste in American healthcare: An overview of sources and approaches to reduction. Milbank Quarterly, 86(4), 631-666.
• Berwick, D. M. (2009). Safe healthcare: Incorporating safety into the culture of healthcare delivery. JAMA, 302(11), 1244-1245.
• Leape, L. L., et al. (1998).-- Managing and reducing errors in medicine. BMJ, 317(7151), 516-519.
• Pronovost, P., et al. (2006). An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(26), 2725-2732.
• Makary, M. A., & Daniel, M. (2016). Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ, 353, i2139.
• Classen, D. C., et al. (2011). The serious reportable events framework: Implications for patient safety and clinical practice. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20(2), 165-170.
• Chassin, M. R., & Loeb, J. M. (2011). High-reliability hospitals. JAMA, 306(15), 1690-1691.