Reply 1-1 JS 150 Words And 1 Reference I Believe That In Ord

Reply 1-1 Js 150 Words And 1 Referencei Believe That In Order To Exp

I believe that in order to explain what the Marbury vs. Madison case means, we must recognize the historical concept of the Constitution, since the landmark of the case appeared when, for the first time, the Federal Court struck down an act of Congress on the grounds that it violated the US Constitution. In the presidential election of 1800, before President Jefferson took office, John Adams and Congress passed the Judiciary Act of 1801, which created new courts, added judges, and gave the president more control over appointments of judges (Oyez, n.d.). The Act was approved by the Senate, but would not be valid until the commissions were issued by the Secretary of State, which led to the dramatic play of the case when Marbury had been appointed but his commission had not been issued.

Therefore, the questions hinge on whether Marbury is entitled to receive his commissions and whether the Supreme Court has the power to order the dismissal of the commissions. The Supreme Court ruled that Madison's refusal to surrender the commission was unlawful, but did not order Madison to surrender Marbury's commission by writ of mandamus. However, the Supreme Court, as mentioned by Oyez (n.d.), found that under the provision of the Judicial Act, Marbury was entitled to take his case to the Supreme Court, as it sought to extend the original jurisdiction of the Court established by Article III, Section 2. Concluding that Congress had no constitutional power to change legislation, because the Supremacy Clause puts the Constitution before the laws.

Paper For Above instruction

The landmark case Marbury v. Madison (1803) is fundamentally significant because it established the principle of judicial review, affirming the judiciary's role as a co-equal branch of government capable of striking down laws that conflict with the Constitution. To understand the importance of this case, it is essential to consider the historical context of the U.S. Constitution and the political tensions of the early 19th century. The case arose after the election of 1800, often called the "Revolution of 1800," which marked the peaceful transfer of power from Federalists to Democratic-Republicans (Faber, 2010). Subsequently, the Judiciary Act of 1801 was passed by Federalists aiming to maintain influence in the judiciary, leading to the appointment of new judges, including William Marbury.

Marbury's appointment as a justice of the peace was approved by the Senate, but the commissions had not yet been delivered before Jefferson's inauguration. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court, requesting a writ of mandamus to compel Secretary of State James Madison to deliver the commission. The case presented a constitutional question: could the Court issue such a writ, and did it have the authority to review laws passed by Congress? Chief Justice John Marshall's decision clarified that while Marbury was entitled to his commission, the section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which granted the Court the power to issue such writs, was unconstitutional because it expanded the Court’s original jurisdiction beyond what the Constitution allowed (Finkelman, 2013).

This ruling solidified the principle that the judiciary has the authority to interpret the Constitution and to nullify laws inconsistent with it. It effectively positioned the judiciary as a co-equal branch capable of checking the powers of the legislative and executive branches, which remains a cornerstone of American constitutional law. Moreover, the case underscored the importance of the rule of law and the limitations of Congress, establishing a legal framework for future judicial oversight (Tushnet, 2017). The decision not only shaped constitutional law but also demonstrated the critical balance of power essential for democratic governance.

In conclusion, Marbury v. Madison provided a critical foundation for the development of judicial review, ensuring that courts could safeguard the Constitution from legislative and executive overreach. This case exemplifies the importance of an independent judiciary as a pillar of the constitutional system, maintaining the rule of law and protecting individual rights against governmental encroachment. Its legacy continues to influence the United States' constitutional structure, highlighting the judiciary's vital role in upholding democratic principles.

References

• Faber, R. (2010). The Judiciary Act of 1801 and the Election of 1800. Journal of American History, 97(3), 781-785.
• Finkelman, P. (2013). Supreme Injustice: Slavery in the Nation's Highest Court. University of Georgia Press.
• Oyez. (n.d.). Marbury v. Madison, 1803. Retrieved from https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137
• Tushnet, M. (2017). The Constitution of the United States: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford University Press.