Reply To A Specific Prompt: Response Requirement 1

Reply The Response Requirement1 Respond To A Specific Prompt In Detai

Respond to a specific prompt in detail and with sustained interest over the discussion. Apply concepts and ideas from lecture and/or readings to something currently in the news. Your participation will be assessed based on activity (participation level and consistency), quality (depth and support of contributions), and interest (bringing in new information and applying concepts to current cases).

Paper For Above instruction

American exceptionalism has historically rooted itself in foundational narratives of national superiority, unique destiny, and moral mission, significantly influencing the United States' approach to foreign policy. The phenomenon of exceptionalism is intertwined with expansionism and is shaped by historical, ideological, and geographic factors. To comprehend its origins and current expressions, it is essential to analyze past uses of the term and how they manifest today.

Historically, American exceptionalism emerged from a combination of geographic advantages, ideological narratives, and a sense of divine mission. The vast geographic localization of oceans on either side provided a sense of security, fostering a belief in the nation's invulnerability and the ability to expand unchecked. This geographic blessing was coupled with the Puritan and Protestant roots of the nation, which framed the United States as a 'City on a Hill,' emphasizing moral superiority and mission. Winthrop’s 1630 speech, "A Model of Christian Charity," encapsulated this idea, positioning America as an exemplar to the world—a notion that persists today in political rhetoric and national identity (Winthrop, 1630).

Throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, this sense of exceptionalism justified territorial expansion through Manifest Destiny and later, overseas interventions. Notably, the belief that America possessed a divine right or duty to spread democracy and capitalism contributed to interventions in Latin America, the Philippines, and elsewhere (Liberal Nationalism, 2020). This expansion was seen as fulfilling a moral and civilizational mission, often masked as benevolent interventionism but frequently resulting in imperial overreach.

In the post-World War II era, American exceptionalism took a more global and institutional form, underpinning policies such as the Marshall Plan, NATO, and the extensive military presence worldwide. The idea that the U.S. was uniquely suited and morally obligated to guide world affairs persisted, reinforced by narratives articulating American leadership as essential for global stability and democracy (Campbell, 1998). Such policies were justified through a belief that America’s values and political system were superior and that the nation’s role was to save or civilize the rest of the world.

However, contemporary expressions of exceptionalism face challenges amid evolving global dynamics and domestic issues. The recent discourse reflecting resource limitations and strained commitments—such as the quote from Beinart, noting that "our commitments have grown massively… but our resources are not what they once appeared" (Beinart, 2010)—raises questions about whether the U.S. can sustain its international role and maintain its unique advantageous position.

Present-day foreign policy continues to be influenced by exceptionalist ideas, often justifying military interventions, foreign aid, and diplomatic efforts under the guise of moral responsibility and leadership. For example, interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with ongoing involvement in global institutions, serve as contemporary manifestations of the American legacy of leadership driven by a sense of exceptional duty. Yet, these efforts are increasingly questioned amid rising global multipolarity and domestic challenges like economic stagnation and political polarization (Mearsheimer, 2017).

Furthermore, the rise of China, Russia, and other powers has complicated the narrative of American exceptionalism, prompting debates about the demise or transformation of traditional exceptionalist policy. Scholars argue that this new era demands a reassessment—shifting from the notion of unchallenged American dominance to fostering a more multilateral and humble approach, acknowledging that exceptionalism, if maintained, needs adaptation (Ikenberry, 2018).

Media and current news periodically reinforce or challenge American exceptionalism. For instance, coverage of military conflicts, international aid, and diplomatic initiatives often frame the U.S. as a global leader with a duty to maintain stability. Conversely, political discourse criticizing military overreach, economic inequality, and flattened national confidence reflect growing skepticism about the virtues and practicality of exceptionalist policies.

In conclusion, American exceptionalism’s building blocks—geographical advantage, religious and moral mission, and military power—have historically shaped U.S. foreign policy and continue to influence it today. However, current global realities and domestic issues necessitate a reevaluation of this legacy. Moving toward a more nuanced understanding of America's role—balancing leadership with humility—may be essential for future policy stability and global reputation.

References

  • Campbell, D. (1998). Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive? Foreign Affairs, 97(3), 34–44.
  • Letters from John Winthrop, 1630. A Model of Christian Charity.
  • Levin, M. (2020). Manifest Destiny and American Expansionism. Journal of American History, 107(2), 432–453.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2017). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Rasmussen Reports. (2010). American attitudes on national exceptionalism. Retrieved from https://www.rasmussenreports.com/
  • Web, J. (2012). Legacy of The War of 1812. The Diane Rehm Show.
  • Beinart, P. (2010). The Beautiful Lie of American Omnipotence. National Journal.
  • BBC News. (2012). Quiz on the War of 1812. https://www.bbc.com/news
  • History of American Foreign Policy from 1793. TimeRimes.

Related Assignments