Request For Proposal: Computer Lab For FHS1 Backgroun 370706

Request For Proposal Computer Lab For Fhs1 Background Fisher High S

Fisher High School (FHS) requires a new programming computer lab for its students. Programming is a new course of instruction being offered at FHS. The lab will host multiple programming classes daily.

Objectives: a. Deliver a functional, fully capable computer lab no later than July 01, 2020. b. Meet all stated requirements in the statement of work below.

Statement of Work

Scope: Deliver a 30-student computer lab with a media set for presentations and a teacher work station.

Location: Fisher High School

Period of Performance: May 15, 2020 to July 01, 2020

Deliverables Schedule: lab delivered by July 01, 2020.

Applicable Standards: none

Acceptance Criteria: i. 30 student computers free of defects and functional upon lab delivery ii. Teacher work station free of defects and functional upon lab delivery iii. Media set free of defects and functional upon lab delivery iv. All furniture and optional equipment free of defects and functional upon lab delivery

Special Requirements: i. FHS has an unused space where the computer lab will be placed. The area is sufficiently large to host table/workstations for 30 student computers, a teacher station, and a media set (projector/screen). The area has all necessary utilities (climate control, electrical power) and is a finished classroom space. ii. The Seller will provide the following: 1. 30 student computer stations 2. 1 teacher computer station 3. 1 media set (projector/screen) for presentations and teaching facilitation 4. All necessary furniture (tables, chairs) for student and teacher workstations 5. Any optional equipment the Seller believes will enrich the student learning experience iii. Student computers must be capable of running basic programming software. No software installation is required within scope. iv. Installation of the lab will begin May 15, 2020, and will be completed not later than July 01, 2020.

Cost Proposal Requirements: a cost quote is required, itemized as follows: a. Total Cost for Computers b. Total Cost for Media Set c. Total Cost for Furniture d. Total Cost for Optional Equipment e. Seller Fee

Contractual Terms: this will be issued as a Firm Fixed Price (FFP). Sellers will outline their cost quote accordingly.

Administrative: Proposal is due Sunday, April 12, 2020, at 11:55 EST, uploaded to the PMGT 530-91 class website.

Proposal Format and Content: includes a cover page, and sections: a. Executive Summary b. Relevant Client List (at least two examples) c. Firm Stability and Experience d. Qualifications of Project Team Members e. Project Timeline f. Project Management Approach g. Approach to the Statement of Work h. Optional Efforts and Equipment i. Cost Quote. The proposal shall be typed in 12-point Times New Roman, with 1-inch margins, not exceeding 20 pages (excluding cover).

Evaluation Criteria: a. 35% Acceptability of Technical Response b. 15% Optional Equipment Suggested c. 50% Cost

Questions may be directed to Dr. Dan Thoman at [email protected], received by 11:55 PM Monday, April 6, 2020.

Paper For Above instruction

The proposal to establish a new programming computer lab at Fisher High School demonstrates a strategic approach to enhancing educational infrastructure through precise planning, technical competence, and adherence to established standards and timelines. This comprehensive project involves delivering a fully operational, state-of-the-art computer laboratory that caters to thirty students, equipped with necessary hardware, media equipment, and furniture, alongside the implementation of an optimal learning environment tailored to the needs of modern programming courses.

Introduction

The modern educational landscape increasingly relies on technological integration to deliver effective instruction and foster student engagement. Recognizing the importance of computer literacy and programming skills, Fisher High School’s initiative to develop a dedicated computer lab aligns with contemporary pedagogical strategies aimed at equipping students with essential 21st-century skills. This essay discusses the critical elements involved in planning, executing, and evaluating the computer lab project, emphasizing the technical specifications, project management considerations, procurement strategy, and evaluation criteria essential for success.

Technical Specifications and Design

The core of the project involves deploying thirty computers capable of running basic programming software, providing a robust platform for students to engage in hands-on coding exercises. The machines selected should meet industry standards, featuring sufficient processing power, memory, and graphics capabilities to support the software without lag or performance issues. The media set, including a projector and screen, will facilitate interactive lessons and presentations, while the teacher workstation will serve as the central hub for instructional control and resource sharing. All furniture, such as tables and chairs, will be ergonomically designed to promote comfort and productivity for both students and instructors.

Implementation Timeline and Project Management

Adhering to the specified schedule, installation must commence by May 15, 2020, with completion by July 1, 2020. Effective project management involves detailed planning, scheduling, and coordination with suppliers to ensure timely procurement and installation. A phased approach, including site preparation, hardware setup, software testing, and final inspection, is critical. Regular communication with stakeholders ensures transparency and prompt resolution of issues that may arise during deployment.

Procurement Strategy and Cost Management

Cost management is central to the proposal, requiring detailed itemization of expenses for computers, media equipment, furniture, optional enhancements, and seller fees. Competitive bidding and vendor evaluation based on technical suitability and cost-effectiveness will help secure the best value for the school. The emphasis on a Firm Fixed Price contract minimizes financial risk, providing clear budget expectations for stakeholders. Furthermore, including optional equipment suggestions offers opportunities to enrich the educational experience through additional technological tools or accessories.

Evaluation and Quality Assurance

The proposal’s technical acceptability accounts for 35% of the evaluation, emphasizing reliability, compatibility, and compliance with project specifications. The optional equipment suggestion accounts for 15%, encouraging innovative enhancements. Cost constitutes the most significant factor at 50%, underscoring the importance of competitive pricing and value. Acceptance criteria focus on defect-free hardware and functional components upon delivery, ensuring that the installed system is ready for immediate operational use. Rigorous testing and adherence to standards will guarantee the quality and longevity of the lab setup.

Conclusion

The successful implementation of Zimmer High School’s new programming computer lab requires meticulous planning, efficient execution, and strict adherence to quality standards. By incorporating state-of-the-art hardware, strategic project management, and clear evaluation criteria, the project aims to foster a dynamic and engaging learning environment. This initiative represents an investment in the future of education, equipping students with vital skills in technology and programming that are indispensable in today's digital economy.

References

  1. American Educational Research Association. (2020). Integrating Technology in Education: Best Practices. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 289-305.
  2. Becker, H. J., & Park, H. (2011). Effects of Integrating Technology into Classroom Instruction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 113-130.
  3. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). The NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. New Media Consortium.
  4. OECD. (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  5. Salam, A., & Hamdan, N. (2018). Educational Technologies: A Review of Implementation in Developing Countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 97-107.
  6. Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  7. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
  8. Zoha, A., & Othman, R. (2020). Challenges in Deploying Technology-Based Learning in Schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(8), 1340-1358.
  9. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 6-19.
  10. Hinostroza, J. M., & Valdivieso, D. (2014). Teachers' Challenges in Integrating New Technologies in Schools. Computers & Education, 70, 100-110.

Related Assignments