Required Resources For Drowning Essay 2013 Writing College R

Required Resourcestext Drown E Sole K 2013writing College R

Develop a research paper using the provided resources on the topic of evaluating sources, building arguments, and proper citation practices in academic writing. Incorporate strategies for identifying bias and propaganda online, presenting arguments effectively, and paraphrasing or quoting sources correctly. Utilize the suggested materials, including videos, articles, and model outlines, to guide your research, outline development, and writing process. Emphasize critical evaluation of online sources and academic integrity throughout your paper.

Paper For Above instruction

In academic writing, the ability to evaluate sources critically, develop coherent arguments, and cite appropriately are fundamental skills that underpin scholarly integrity and contribute to the clarity and credibility of a research paper. The resources provided offer a comprehensive framework for mastering these skills, especially in the context of internet research and non-fiction writing, which are increasingly relevant in the digital age.

Evaluating Internet Sources and Recognizing Bias

One of the primary challenges faced by students is assessing the credibility of online sources. Baber et al. (2011) provide insights into recognizing propaganda, bias, and advertising on the internet. Their video outlines strategies such as examining the author's credentials, cross-referencing information, and analyzing the language used to identify potential biases. These critical evaluation skills are essential because the internet hosts a vast array of information, some of which may be misleading or intentionally deceptive. As Kloza (2013) emphasizes, understanding the nature of online propaganda enhances a researcher's ability to select reliable sources.

Furthermore, the PowerPoint presentation by Lewis (2012) underscores the importance of effective search strategies and evaluating sources beyond the surface. It encourages students to develop a skeptical yet open-minded approach when researching topics, thus ensuring a solid foundation for argumentation based on trustworthy information. Applying these evaluation techniques contributes to building a credible and well-supported research paper.

Constructing Arguments and Presenting Evidence

Presenting a clear and persuasive argument is central to academic writing. Brown and Lanning (1988) offer a humorous yet insightful perspective on how to present arguments effectively, whether in writing or speech. Their episode discusses the importance of logical structure, the use of evidence, and the ethical presentation of facts. Similarly, the video titled "Evidence in Argument" from Critical Thinking (Online Classroom TV, 2009) emphasizes incorporating reliable evidence to support claims, which bolsters the argument's validity and persuasiveness.

Developing a strong argument involves more than just presenting facts; it requires integrating evidence seamlessly and maintaining logical coherence. Garten et al. (2014) provide a model outline illustrating how to structure an argumentative essay with an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. This outline emphasizes clarity, coherence, and the importance of supporting each claim with appropriate evidence.

Proper Citation and Avoiding Plagiarism

Accurate citation of sources is vital to uphold academic integrity and avoid plagiarism. The Ashford Writing Center tutorial (n.d.) and Driscoll & Brizee (2013) highlight strategies for paraphrasing, quoting, and citing sources using APA style. Proper paraphrasing involves rewriting the original information in one's own words while maintaining fidelity to the source's meaning. Quoting should be reserved for impactful statements that benefit from their original wording. Both techniques require clear citation practices to give credit to the original authors and avoid unethical scholarly behavior.

Moreover, the resources "Guidelines for paraphrasing sources" and "Integrating quotes" offer practical advice on how to incorporate source material ethically and effectively. The PowerPoint presentation on evaluating internet sources also stresses the importance of cross-referencing information and citing appropriately, which collectively foster academic honesty.

Developing Coherent Paragraphs and Structuring Essays

Effective paragraph development supports the overall clarity of a research paper. As outlined by "Good paragraph development: As easy as P.I.E." (n.d.), each paragraph should focus on a single idea supported by evidence, introduced and concluded with clear sentences. This method helps keep arguments organized and accessible to readers.

Essay structure resources (n.d.) reinforce the importance of outlining before writing, organizing ideas logically, and including strong introductions and conclusions. Utilizing these tools ensures the writer's ideas are conveyed coherently and persuasively from the opening to the closing remarks.

Integrating Sources and Maintaining Academic Honesty

Effective source integration requires skillful paraphrasing, quoting, and citation. The resource "Avoiding plagiarism" (n.d.) and the tutorials by Ashford University emphasize that proper integration supports the writer's voice while giving proper credit to original authors. This practice not only prevents plagiarism but also enhances the credibility of the research.

Overall, these resources collectively inform the process of conducting research, evaluating information critically, constructing well-supported arguments, and citing sources correctly. These skills are essential for producing a high-quality, ethically sound research paper that contributes meaningfully to academic discourse.

Conclusion

Mastering source evaluation, argument development, and citation practices is integral to effective academic writing. The tools and strategies provided in these resources guide students through each step of the research process, emphasizing critical thinking, ethical scholarship, and clear communication. By applying these principles diligently, students can produce compelling research papers that demonstrate scholarly integrity and contribute valuable insights to their academic fields.

References

  • Baber, J. (Producer), Fabian, R. (Writer & Director), Horner, J., Rotkowski, R., & Yeager, K. (Writers). (2011). Recognizing online propaganda, bias, and advertising [Series episode]. In B. Kloza (Executive producer), Internet research and information literacy: Effective strategies and cautionary tales. Cambridge Educational. Retrieved from [Database]
  • Brown, A., & Lanning, G. (Directors). (1988). Models of non-fiction writing: Presenting an argument [Series episode]. In P. Griffiths (Producer), Thames Television. Retrieved from [Database]
  • Driscoll, D. L., & Brizee, A. (2013, February 15). Quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. Retrieved from [URL]
  • Garten, A., Morrell, C., & Gunyon, R. (2014). Model Outline. Division of General Education, Ashford University. Retrieved from [URL]
  • Garten, A., & Wilson, J. (2014). An Introduction to Argument [PDF]. College of Liberal Arts, Ashford University. Retrieved from [Online classroom]
  • Kloza, B. (Ed.). (2013). Internet research and information literacy: Effective strategies and cautionary tales. Cambridge Educational.
  • Lewis, C. (2012). So you think you can Google? [PowerPoint presentation]. Ashford University Library. Retrieved from [URL]
  • Online Classroom TV. (2009). Evidence in argument [Series episode]. In Critical thinking. Bristol, UK: Classroom Video, Ltd. Retrieved from [Database]
  • PowerPoint presentation. (2013). Tips for the effective evaluation of internet sources. Ashford University Library. Retrieved from [URL]
  • Plagiarism, quoting, & paraphrasing (Part 1 of 2). (2011). USC Rossier. Retrieved from [URL]

Related Assignments