Requirements And Criteria For Content For This Presentation

Requirementscriteria For Contentfor This Presentation Select An

For this presentation, select an area of nurse practitioner (NP) practice that is of interest to you and in which you would like to see a practice change occur. Conduct a review of literature to see what is currently known about the topic and to find research support for the practice change you are recommending. Be sure to provide speaker's notes for all slides except the title and reference slides. Create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation that includes the following:

1. Introduction: The slide should identify concepts to be addressed and sections of the presentation. Include speaker’s notes that explain, in more detail, what will be covered.

2. Evidence-based projects: The slide should explain the general importance of master's-prepared nurses engaging in evidence-based projects related to nursing practice and profession. Provide speaker’s notes with additional detail and support from at least one outside scholarly source (not the textbook or course lesson).

3. Conceptual Model: Provide an illustration of a conceptual model (such as The Johns Hopkins or ARCC models) that could be used to develop an evidence-based project. In speaker’s notes, explain how the model would be applied and support it with at least one outside scholarly source.

4. Area of Interest: Identify an area of interest related to NP practice where a practice change may be needed. Describe what is currently known about the topic and explain its importance to NP practice, supported by at least one scholarly source.

5. Issue/concern and recommendation for change: Identify a specific concern related to the area of interest, and present a recommended practice change. Explain the rationale and support it with scholarly sources.

6. Factors Influencing Change: Identify at least two internal and two external factors that could impact implementing the recommendation. Explain how these factors might support or impede the change, with references.

7. NONPF Competencies: Identify at least two NONPF competencies relevant to the evidence-based project. Explain how these competencies relate to the area of interest, supported by scholarly sources.

8. Conclusion: Provide a summary of main points and final comments on the topic.

Submission Requirements include using Microsoft PowerPoint to create an 8-12 slide presentation, including speaker notes with in-text citations, at least four scholarly references, and proper submission formatting.

Paper For Above instruction

Selecting an area of nurse practitioner practice for implementing change necessitates a comprehensive understanding of current evidence, conceptual frameworks, and contextual factors influencing the process. This scholarly exploration aims to delineate the importance of engaging in evidence-based projects, describe a suitable conceptual model, identify a pertinent practice area, and recommend actionable change. The integration of NONPF competencies and identification of influencing factors further guide the implementation process, ensuring alignment with professional standards and contextual realities.

Introduction

The presentation begins by introducing the concept of evidence-based practice (EBP) within nurse practitioner (NP) roles, emphasizing its importance for improving patient outcomes, healthcare quality, and professional development. The subsequent sections outline the significance of EBP projects for master's-prepared nurses, the selection of an appropriate conceptual model to guide the change process, and the identification of a specific NP practice area requiring a practice change. The presentation will also examine the key issue, propose a practical recommendation, discuss influencing factors, and relate the process to professional competency standards.

Importance of Evidence-Based Projects

Engaging in evidence-based projects is pivotal for master's-prepared nurses, as it bridges research with clinical practice to optimize patient care and promote ongoing professional growth (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). Such initiatives foster clinical excellence by translating the latest scientific evidence into practice, thus reducing variability in care and enhancing safety. Moreover, involvement in EBP nurtures critical thinking, leadership, and innovation skills essential for advancing NP practice (Titler, 2018). The scholarly literature underscores that when nurses actively participate in EBP, there is a positive impact on patient satisfaction, reduced readmission rates, and improved health outcomes.

Conceptual Model for Evidence-Based Projects

A suitable model for guiding EBP projects is the John Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model, which emphasizes a systematic process of practice question development, evidence appraisal, and implementation. This model’s clarity and focus facilitate the translation of evidence into practice change effectively (Brown et al., 2020). In application, the model begins with formulating a clinical question, gathering relevant evidence, and assessing its quality before applying findings to practice. The model supports continuous evaluation and sustainability of change, ensuring that interventions are evidence-based and patient-centered. Scholarly support indicates this model’s versatility across various healthcare settings and topics.

Area of Interest

The chosen area for practice change is the low adherence to adult vaccination schedules, notably influenza and COVID-19 vaccines among vulnerable populations. Current literature establishes that vaccination rates remain suboptimal, especially among minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups (Lee et al., 2021). This gap influences morbidity and mortality related to preventable diseases. The importance of improving vaccination compliance is rooted in public health imperatives, NP roles in health education, and preventive care. Addressing barriers such as vaccine hesitancy, misinformation, and access disparities is critical in promoting better health outcomes and aligns with NP scope of practice.

Issue, Concern, and Recommendation for Change

The primary concern is the low vaccination uptake among high-risk populations, which perpetuates preventable disease transmission. The recommendation is to implement a targeted, evidence-based vaccination outreach program within primary care settings. This approach includes structured educational interventions, cultural competency training for staff, and community engagement efforts. The rationale is supported by literature demonstrating that tailored educational strategies and proactive outreach significantly improve vaccination rates (Williams et al., 2019). Such a practice change leverages NP roles as educators and advocates, thereby enhancing population health and aligning with public health guidelines.

Factors Influencing Change

Internal factors influencing implementation include the NP’s expertise in health education and clinic team collaboration, which facilitate the rollout of vaccination programs. External factors include healthcare policies, availability of vaccines, and community trust levels. Regulatory mandates and funding can either support or hinder efforts, while community trust impacts acceptance. Literature indicates that organizational support and community engagement are critical facilitators of successful health interventions (Smith & Johnson, 2020). Recognizing and strategizing around these factors improve the likelihood of sustainable change.

NONPF Competencies

Two relevant NONPF competencies are: (1) Evidence-Based Practice and (2) Professional Practice. The EBP competency relates to conducting, evaluating, and applying current evidence to develop and implement practice changes. The Professional Practice competency emphasizes role development as a leader and advocate in promoting health care improvements. These competencies underpin the NP’s ability to initiate and sustain evidence-based interventions, thus directly impacting the chosen practice area—vaccination promotion among vulnerable populations (National Task Force on Rule of Practice, 2018).

Conclusion

This presentation underscores the importance of integrating evidence-based practice, conceptual frameworks, and professional competencies in guiding practice change within nurse practitioner roles. Addressing vaccine adherence demonstrates how targeted interventions can improve patient outcomes and public health. Recognizing factors that influence change ensures a strategic approach, aligning with professional standards and community needs. Ultimately, advancing NP practice through evidence-based projects fosters both individual and population health improvements.

References

• Brown, C., Smith, R., & Jones, L. (2020). Implementing the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model: Strategies for success. Nursing Clinics of North America, 55(2), 177–192.
• Lee, S., Kim, J., & Lee, H. (2021). Vaccine hesitancy among minority populations in the United States: Barriers and facilitators. Journal of Public Health Nursing, 38(4), 523–532.
• Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Wolters Kluwer.
• National Task Force on Rule of Practice. (2018). NONPF nurse practitioner competencies. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 9(2), 45–53.
• Smith, T., & Johnson, M. (2020). Organizational factors affecting vaccine implementation in primary care. Journal of Healthcare Management, 65(5), 324–333.
• Titler, M. (2018). The importance of nursing leadership in evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 15(4), 291–293.
• Williams, L., Clark, R., & Thomas, P. (2019). Outreach strategies to increase vaccination rates: A systematic review. Vaccine, 37(50), 7234–7244.