Research And Critique The Business Network Structure Of An E

Research And Critique The Business Network Structure Of An Enterprise

Research and critique the business network structure of an enterprise of your choice. You may use an actual enterprise, or a fictional enterprise you defined for your case studies in previous courses. Address the following topics: Differentiation: The subdivision of individuals, groups, and organizations into specialized workgroups. Integration: The links and relationships between the workgroups, the overall organization, and individuals in terms of: Task-based relationships, Information-based relationships, Social relationships. Decision-making differentiation: The differentiation among business units based on products or services, business functions, and geographic markets. To complete the assignment, you need to post a Microsoft Word 300-word research report, to address the following: Research the governance model used in your company. Discuss different methods of governance and how they might benefit the company. Review the level of collaboration among various business units, external suppliers, distributors, and customers. Evaluate whether your company is meeting the requirements for participating in a collaborative community. If not, what changes or improvements would you recommend?

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding the business network structure of an enterprise is essential for assessing its operational efficiency, decision-making processes, and adaptability to external environments. For this analysis, I have selected Amazon Inc., a global leader in e-commerce and cloud computing services, to evaluate its differentiation, integration, and decision-making structures within its business network.

Differentiation: Amazon’s organizational structure exhibits a high degree of specialization across various subdivisions. The company maintains distinct business units such as Amazon Retail, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Prime Video, and logistics operations like Amazon Fulfillment Centers. These subdivisions focus on specialized products, services, and geographic markets. For instance, AWS operates independently with its own strategic objectives, while Amazon Retail concentrates on consumer e-commerce. This specialization allows Amazon to tailor strategies to specific markets and customer needs, enhancing competitive advantage.

Integration: Amazon’s internal linkages foster robust task-based, information-based, and social relationships. Task-based integration is evident in seamless logistics and supply chain coordination between warehouses, delivery partners, and customer service units. Information integration is facilitated through advanced data analytics and centralized IT systems that provide real-time metrics across all units, ensuring coordinated decision-making. Social relationships are nurtured through corporate culture initiatives and cross-functional teams that encourage collaboration across divisions.

Decision-Making Differentiation: Amazon employs a decentralized decision-making structure in its core business units, allowing each division to pursue strategic objectives aligned with overall corporate goals. For example, AWS has autonomous leadership to innovate rapidly in cloud technology, while retail operations focus on customer experience enhancements. Geographic markets are managed through regional headquarters that adapt global strategies to local contexts, reflecting a nuanced differentiation in operational autonomy and strategic focus.

Governance Model and Benefits: Amazon adopts a hybrid governance model combining centralized oversight with decentralized decision-making authority. This model benefits the company by maintaining strong executive control while allowing flexibility and innovation at the division level. Different governance methods, such as Corporate Governance Committees and autonomous division leadership, support strategic alignment and risk management.

Collaboration and Community Participation: Amazon’s extensive use of external suppliers, logistics partners, and distributors demonstrates a high level of ecosystem integration, essential for its delivery excellence. Internally, collaborative platforms enable cross-divisional communication. However, participation in broader collaborative communities, such as industry consortia, could be enhanced through increased engagement in standard-setting bodies to drive innovation and shared value creation. Recommendations include fostering more open innovation initiatives and expanding partnerships with startups and academia to strengthen its collaborative ecosystem.

In conclusion, Amazon’s business network structure exemplifies effective differentiation and integration strategies supported by a hybrid governance model that fosters innovation and resilience. Enhancing engagement with external collaborative communities could further secure its competitive edge in the evolving digital economy.

References

• Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Choi, T. M., & Tan, K. H. (2008). Quantitative models for supply chain management. IIE Transactions, 40(8), 745-747.
• Johnson, H. T., & Scholes, K. (2008). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson Education.
• Koufteros, X. A., Vonderembse, M. A., & Doll, T. (2014). Developing measures of agile manufacturing practices and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 32(3), 154-169.
• Meyer, C., & Heppard, J. (2000). Strategic Management. McGraw-Hill.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
• Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Portfolio.
• Thomas, R. K., & McGowan, L. (2009). Building trust through social relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 565-574.
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
• West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814-831.