Research Design And Sampling Plan Selection For Client Cases

Research Design and Sampling Plan Selection for Client Cases

Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling, and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) double-spaced pages; refer to the “Format Requirements” page located at the beginning of this learning guide for specific format requirements.

Paper For Above instruction

This paper explores the appropriate research design and sampling plans for two different client cases, focusing on how to properly address their unique research needs. The first case involves a consumer packaged goods (CPG) manufacturer experiencing a decline in market share, while the second case centers on a competitive brand analyzing package design factors, as well as other cases involving dealer feedback and market predictions. Each situation requires a tailored approach to research methodology, ensuring accurate data collection and valid conclusions.

Research Design Recommendations for the Clients

Client A: Consumer Packaged Goods Manufacturer

The appropriate research design for Client A involves employing a causal or explanatory research design. Given that the client has observed a 15% decline in market share, the primary goal is to identify the causes of this decline to facilitate corrective actions. Causal research allows for the analysis of relationships between variables, such as marketing strategies, consumer perceptions, and market share fluctuations. Conducting experiments or controlled studies—such as test marketing or A/B testing—can help isolate the factors contributing to market share erosion. For example, the research could manipulate different variables, such as advertising messages or promotional offers, to see what influence they have on consumer behavior.

This design permits the researcher to infer causality, which is essential when trying to determine the specific reasons behind the decline. Additionally, survey research can supplement causal studies by capturing consumer attitudes or perceptions related to the brand and its competitors, providing a comprehensive understanding of the problem.

Client B: Package Design Factors in a Competitive Category

For Client B, a descriptive research design is most suitable. The goal is to identify which package design elements (size, shape, color, texture) influence consumer awareness, preference, and purchase intention. Descriptive research enables detailed measurement and description of consumer responses to different package features without manipulation of variables or establishing cause-and-effect relationships.

This design typically involves conducting surveys or experimental designs such as product testing or conjoint analysis. Conjoint analysis is particularly effective in assessing how various package attributes collectively influence consumer preferences and willingness to buy. The research can be carried out through structured questionnaires where consumers rate or choose between different packaging options, allowing the researcher to determine which features are most impactful.

In short, the descriptive approach provides the necessary insights into consumer preferences regarding package design, enabling the client to optimize packaging strategies within a competitive context.

Justification of the Research Design Choices

The causal research design for Client A is justified because the primary concern is understanding the reasons behind a decrease in market share. Causal research provides the framework to test hypotheses about the influence of various marketing factors and allows for controlled experimentation, which can directly inform strategic decisions.

The descriptive design for Client B is ideal because the focus is on understanding consumer preferences related to specific package design features. Descriptive research offers a detailed snapshot of consumer responses and preferences, essential for making targeted modifications to packaging that could enhance awareness and sales.

Sampling Plan Recommendations for Client A and B

Client A: Honda USA Dealer Feedback

For the Honda dealer feedback case, a stratified random sampling plan is recommended. Since the goal is to gather insights that are representative of all 550 dealers, stratifying the dealer population based on relevant characteristics—such as geographic location, size, or sales volume—can ensure diverse representation. Randomly selecting dealers within each stratum enhances the precision and reliability of the results, minimizing sampling bias and ensuring that different types of dealerships are proportionally included in the sample.

Client B: Estimating Units of a New Photocopy Machine

In the case of estimating anticipated purchases among Cleveland firms, a simple random sampling plan is appropriate. The population consists of firms classified by size (small, medium, large), and the researcher wishes to generalize findings to the entire population. Random sampling ensures each firm has an equal chance of selection, reducing bias. Stratified random sampling could be employed here as well to ensure adequate representation across firm sizes, but if the focus is on the overall market potential, simple random sampling within the listed strata is sufficient for estimation purposes.

Reasoning Behind the Sampling Plan Choices

The stratified random sampling plan for Honda USA’s dealer survey ensures heterogeneity is accounted for, leveraging the known diversity within the dealer population to improve the representativeness of the data. Such a plan increases the likelihood that insights reflect the whole dealer network, enabling more accurate evaluations of the new service program. For the photocopy machine estimation, simple or stratified random sampling ensures unbiased, representative samples that facilitate generalization of the findings—crucial for accurate sales forecasts. Both plans balance efficiency with representativeness, vital for making informed business decisions based on the collected data.

Conclusion

In conclusion, choosing the appropriate research design depends on the specific objectives of each client. Causal research is suitable for diagnosing causes of market decline, while descriptive research effectively assesses consumer preferences for packaging. Likewise, proper sampling plans, such as stratified random sampling for the dealer feedback and simple or stratified random sampling for market estimation, increase the accuracy and generalizability of results. Implementing these tailored strategies ensures robust insights, supporting effective decision-making in competitive and dynamic markets.

References

• Chisnall, P. (2016). Marketing research. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Malhotra, N. K., & Birks, D. F. (2017). Marketing research: An applied approach. Pearson Education.
• Burns, A. C., & Bush, R. F. (2014). Marketing research. Pearson.
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage Publications.
• Churchill, G. A., & Iacobucci, D. (2018). Marketing research: Methodological foundations. Cengage Learning.
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
• Hair, J. F., Wolfinbarger, M., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. J. (2015). Essentials of business research methods. Routledge.
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students. Pearson Education.
• Dodds, W. B., & Monroe, K. B. (1985). The effect of brand packaging on the product evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(3), 307-313.
• Winer, R. S. (2020). Marketing research. Routledge.