Research On My Personal Thinking Style 2

RESEARCH ON MY PERSONAL STYLE OF THINKING 2 Research on Life Style Interpretations

My primary thinking styles are achievement, self-actualization, humanistic-encouragement, and affiliative. The backup thinking styles are perfectionist, competitive, approval, and conventional. These thinking styles manifest in my life and work through various behaviors. Achievement is reflected in my determination to conquer challenges and work diligently to meet my goals and fulfill assigned duties. Self-actualization is demonstrated by my awareness of my potential, organizing this potential to satisfy my personal objectives, and pursuing these goals methodically.

Humanistic-encouragement appears in how I motivate others to achieve their goals, my cooperative attitude towards coworkers, delegation skills, and my ability to inspire teamwork. The affiliative style manifests in my flexibility and adaptability in both personal and professional contexts, allowing me to remain open to emerging trends and new approaches. I identify as a perfectionist, striving for neatness, accuracy, and high standards in all tasks, whether at home or work, refusing to accept substandard outcomes.

My resilience is notable; I have a strong aversion to giving up and have maintained this trait since childhood, consistently striving to outperform others and avoid defeat. I appreciate recognition for my work, both in receiving positive feedback and in acknowledging the accomplishments of coworkers and subordinates. The conventional thinking style signifies my adherence to cultural norms, organizational rules, and regulations, ensuring my actions align with societal and workplace expectations.

I evaluate these styles positively as they accurately reflect my thinking approach. However, my limiting style is centered on power, which hinders my effectiveness. My social nature and position of authority make interactions with my coworkers challenging, especially as some people may fear my authority. This creates barriers to open communication, feedback, and understanding of the challenges faced by my team. Consequently, my ability to identify areas needing improvement is compromised, potentially affecting organizational development.

Efforts to modify my reliance on power have been unsuccessful so far, as the feeling of superiority and pride derived from authority is instinctive. These behaviors widen the gap between myself and my subordinates, impacting team cohesion. By altering this aspect of my personality—fostering humility and approachability—I believe I can develop better relationships and facilitate a more collaborative work environment, ultimately supporting the achievement of organizational goals.

My personal thinking styles significantly influence my management approach across key areas. In planning, styles like perfectionism and humanistic encouragement help me craft precise strategies and mobilize team members effectively. Organizing becomes more straightforward when I incorporate approval, perfectionist, and conventional styles to ensure plans comply with organizational standards. Leadership involves encouraging cooperation through humanistic and encouragement styles, promoting healthy competition among workers, and leveraging the power dynamic judiciously to earn respect and motivate team members.

In controlling operations, my perfectionist approach ensures accuracy, while involving coworkers promotes shared responsibility. These styles foster accountability and continuous improvement, aligning with my role as a manager committed to excellence. My development of these personal styles roots largely in early life experiences. My mother instilled in me perfectionist traits, emphasizing neatness and precision, while my father fostered competitive spirit and a sense of power through rewards and expectations to excel academically and socially.

As the eldest sibling, I was often regarded as a leader, which reinforced feelings of authority and superiority. Formal education further reinforced my competitive nature, enforcement of rules, and desire for achievement through roles like class prefect. Cultural influences also contributed to my adherence to societal norms and customs, shaping my conventional thinking and behavior to conform with expectations.

In conclusion, my personal thinking styles play a pivotal role in shaping my personal and professional life. They facilitate effective relationships with colleagues, subordinates, and the community, enabling me to pursue goals with clarity and purpose. The self-awareness gained from understanding these styles has been instrumental in emphasizing the positive aspects and working actively to improve or change those that hinder my personal or organizational progress. Through continuous reflection and adaptation, I strive to balance authority with approachability, fostering an environment conducive to growth and success.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding personal thinking styles is essential for effective management and personal development. These styles influence decision-making, interpersonal relationships, and organizational effectiveness. This paper explores my primary and secondary thinking styles, their manifestation in my life and work, their origins, and their influence on my managerial approach. It concludes with reflections on how awareness of these styles can foster personal growth and organizational success.

Introduction

Thinking styles are habitual patterns of cognitive and behavioral responses that influence how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to their environment. Recognizing and understanding one's thinking styles is crucial for personal development and effective management. These styles are shaped by early experiences, cultural influences, education, and social interactions. This essay examines my core thinking styles, how they manifest in my daily life and work, their origins, and their impact on my leadership approach.

Core Thinking Styles and Their Manifestations

My primary thinking styles include achievement, self-actualization, humanistic encouragement, and affiliative thinking. Achievement reflects my determination and perseverance in overcoming challenges and attaining goals. I am driven by a strong desire to succeed and to fulfill responsibilities efficiently. Self-actualization involves awareness of my potential and an organized approach to realizing personal and professional objectives. I continuously seek ways to develop myself and maximize my capabilities.

Humanistic encouragement manifests in my proactive efforts to motivate others. I believe in fostering teamwork and cooperation by inspiring colleagues and subordinates. I often delegate tasks and motivate others through positive reinforcement. The affiliative style highlights my adaptability and willingness to accommodate new trends and ideas. I prefer flexible approaches that enable me to adjust to changing circumstances with ease.

My secondary styles include perfectionism, competitiveness, approval-seeking, and conformity. I am a perfectionist, setting high standards for myself and others, emphasizing accuracy and neatness in all endeavors. I dislike substandard work and continually strive for excellence. My competitiveness drives me to outperform peers and establish my superiority, especially in academic and professional settings. I value recognition and approval for my achievements, which motivates me further. Lastly, my conventional thinking aligns with adherence to societal and organizational norms, rules, and customs. I prioritize conformity to cultural expectations and organizational policies as a foundation for stability and success.

Origins of My Thinking Styles

The development of my thinking styles is deeply rooted in my formative experiences. My family played a significant role; my mother instilled perfectionist tendencies, emphasizing neatness and thoroughness in all tasks. My father fostered a competitive mindset by rewarding academic excellence and encouraging me to outperform siblings. As the eldest child, I naturally assumed leadership and authority roles, reinforcing my sense of power and superiority.

Educational experiences further reinforced these traits. Excelling academically and taking on leadership roles such as class prefect ingrained a competitive and rule-abiding attitude. Cultural influences also shaped my conventional thinking, guiding me to respect traditions and societal expectations. These combined experiences fostered a set of enduring habits and perceptions that influence my behavior and decision-making.

Impact on Management and Leadership

My personal thinking styles profoundly influence my managerial approach across various organizational functions. During planning, my perfectionist and humanistic styles ensure meticulous strategy development and effective team mobilization. Organizing becomes more systematic as I adhere to organizational policies, seek approval from colleagues, and ensure compliance with standards. Leadership involves motivating through encouragement, competitive spirit, and judicious use of power, which commands respect and fosters teamwork.

In controlling processes, my perfectionist style ensures accuracy and accountability. I involve team members in monitoring tasks, fostering shared ownership of outcomes. Such approaches facilitate continuous improvement and uphold organizational standards. However, my reliance on power can sometimes hinder communication. My authority may intimidate subordinates, limiting honest feedback and opening dialogues essential for growth. Recognizing this limitation, I am committed to developing a more approachable leadership style, emphasizing humility and open communication to strengthen team cohesion.

Conclusion and Reflections

Understanding my personal thinking styles provides valuable insights into my behavior as a leader and individual. These styles offer strengths—such as goal orientation, motivation capability, and adherence to standards—but also pose challenges, especially relating to authority and relational dynamics. By actively working to balance these traits—particularly reducing an over-reliance on power—I aim to foster a more inclusive, collaborative environment that encourages feedback, innovation, and collective success. Continuous self-awareness and adaptability are key to evolving as an effective leader and a well-rounded individual.

References

1. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (2013). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources. Pearson Education.
2. Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Pearson.
3. Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78-90.
4. McGregor, D. (2006). The Human Side of Enterprise. McGraw-Hill.
5. Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. L. (2009). Immunity to Change: How to Overcome It and Unlock the Potential in Yourself and Your Organization. Harvard Business Press.
6. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9(3), 185-211.
7. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
8. Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.
9. Becker, H. S. (2010). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. Free Press.
10. Tuckman, B. W. (2014). Developing team leadership skills. Team Performance Management, 20(3), 124-135.